Tons more bandwidth for future applications.
Last Monday at a morning press conference in Santa Clara, PCI-SIG, the Special Interest Group overseeing the PCI Express standard, officially announced the availability of PCI Express 3.0 products, and stated that work on the PCI Express 4.0 standard has already begun.
PCI-SIG chairman Al Yanes stated that compliance workshops held in April and June included 23 add-in cards and 19 system boards which meet PCI Express 3.0 specifications. Yanes further stated that major products are underway from many PCI-SIG members, including Agilent Technologies, National Semiconductor, PLX Technology, and Tektronix.
The current PCI Express 2.1 standard enables a speed of 500 MB/s per lane, in each direction. Thus, the 16 lane connection commonly used for PCI Express graphics cards currently has a transfer speed of 8 GB/s. The PCI Express 3.0 standard will double the above transfer rates, enabling a speed of 1 GB/s per lane, or 16 GB/s for a 16 lane connection.
Despite the announcement of PCI Express 3.0 products, the biggest news came in the form of two additional announcements: A “Cable Workgroup” has been established to create a new cable standard, possibly with the intention of competing with Intel’s proprietary Thunderbolt technology. Also, early work on the PCI Express 4.0 standard has already begun.
Al Yanes stated that the cabling technology will have a goal of 20 inch cables for use with servers, 14 inch cables for use with desktops, and 10 inch cables for use with mobile devices. The cable is initially expected to push the limits of copper wire technology, but the door is being left open to include optical technology. Yanes stated “We have crossed every bridge we have come to… but we don’t want to rest on our laurels”.
Intel has been non-committal as to whether it will license Thunderbolt to PCI Express add-on card developers. The technology is certainly feasible: a four lane PCI Express 3.0 connection slot, operating at a speed of 4 GB/s (or 32 Gigabits per second), could easily host a 10 Megabit per second Thunderbolt PCI Express add-on card. However, Intel spokesman Dave Salvator told us recently, “There are no plans to do a Thunderbolt expansion card at this time.” This could mean that Intel plans to license Thunderbolt only as a motherboard feature, not as an add-on card feature. It’s certainly feasible that Intel’s plans are what has lead PCI-SIG to decide to develop their own new cabling technology.
As for PCI Express 4.0, PCI-SIG is confident that they’ll be able to once again double transfer speeds when the technology is introduced. Historically, the development of a new PCI Express standard occurs about once every four years, and PCI-SIG stated that the “4 year sequence” would likely continue to be the expected development period.
PCI Express 3.0 technology is expected to be used to power InfiniBand, Ethernet 40G/100G, ultra high speed Solid State Drives, and, of course, high end graphics cards.
... and a CPU to handle all the bandwidth.
I'll wait for Ivy Bridge and mobo/GPU with PCIe 3.0 for my next upgrade.
Is that supposed to be 10 GIGAbits per second for the Thunderbolt?
Yes, Rainman is happy now
PCIe technology is evolving faster than manufacturers seem willing to adopt it.
nope? loll
Nope. Not even gpu's are maxed out with pci-e 2.0
Yes, if you are looking at enterprise solutions which outweigh the high end GPU market. HBA and NIC tech is pushing the limits and creating a demand for more I/O and bandwidth.
It seems like the closest things we'll get will be the extreme SSDs that are essentially drives on the expansion slot (doesn't OCZ have one now?)
"PCIe 2.0 delivers 5 GT/s, but employs an 8b/10b encoding scheme which results in a 20 percent ((10-8)/10) overhead on the raw bit rate. PCIe 3.0 removes the requirement for 8b/10b encoding and instead uses a technique called "scrambling" in which "a known binary polynomial is applied to a data stream in a feedback topology. Because the scrambling polynomial is known, the data can be recovered by running it through a feedback topology using the inverse polynomial and also uses a 128b/130b ((130-128)/130)encoding scheme, reducing the overhead to approximately 1.5%, as opposed to the 20% overhead of 8b/10b encoding used by PCIe 2.0. PCIe 3.0's 8 GT/s bit rate effectively delivers double PCIe 2.0 bandwidth"
Id rather them be way ahead of the game then behind and have issues.
I think you're confused. The reason you don't see faster video cards isn't because they max out the x16 slot. In fact, most cards won't even max the x8 slots.