Download the Tom's Hardware App from the App Store
The reference for current tech news
Yes No
Ads

Scientists Cross Photonic Hurdle to Faster Computer Chips

by - source: Caltech and UCSD

Scientists have made yet another big step toward replacing silicon chips with photonic circuits.

Research groups at the California Institute of Technology and the University of California, San Diego claim to have discovered a path to light signals on a silicon chip from reflecting backwards and interfering with its operation.

Transporting information in computer chips relies on a technique that allows current to flow in only one direction that avoids interference through a scattered beam that would make a signal and a chip unstable. So far, the model used in silicon chips, which relies on a diode to isolate electric signals, has not been possible. However the researchers say they have developed a metallic-silicon optical waveguide system to channel light so it travels in different patterns depending on its propagation direction. When traveling forward, the pattern is symmetric, but asymmetric when reflected backwards. According to a paper published in the journal Science, backscattered light is dissipated as a result.

"This discovery will help to realize a long-term goal of combining electronics with photonics to enable scalable, energy-efficient and cost-effective technology that will have a tremendous impact on such information systems as supercomputers, the Internet, and data centers," said Yeshaiahu Fainman, professor and chair of the UC San Diego Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering. "Computer technology will be able to handle a lot more data, faster and at lower cost, which will benefit large-scale business and government users as well as gadget-loving consumers."

Share:
26
Comments
X
Submit

Comments
Add your comment
mcvf 08/06/2011 8:56 PM
Hide
-7+

And where is a link to the paper?

BluntObjection 08/06/2011 8:58 PM
Hide
-9+

This just in, Breaking news!

Folding@home cluster running on light cures death.

theguy82 08/06/2011 9:03 PM
Hide
-12+

I am all for technological advances...keep 'em coming..

mister g 08/06/2011 9:04 PM
Hide
-10+

I'll beleive it when I see it. There are so many technologies out there I doubt more than a few of them will make it into mass production. Still, I wish them the best of luck.

SirDevon 08/06/2011 9:27 PM
Hide
--1+

Photonic hurdle = Fast as light computing?

Sign me up!
:P :hello:

dread_cthulhu 08/06/2011 10:03 PM
Hide
-3+

Can I haz? Once this is implemented... it sounds like computers really will be all smoke and mirrors!

dogman_1234 08/06/2011 10:34 PM
Show
sseyler 08/06/2011 11:05 PM
Hide
-9+

mister g :
I'll beleive it when I see it. There are so many technologies out there I doubt more than a few of them will make it into mass production. Still, I wish them the best of luck.



This is still in the realm of applied physics, not "technology", so I'd hold your undue pessimism until later.

amigafan 08/06/2011 11:52 PM
Hide
-12+

Yes I would like my motherboard to glow like commander Data's positronic brain when I open the case :)

11796pcs 08/07/2011 2:39 AM
Hide
--1+

What's the difference between a circuit and a transistor? Are they the same because they sure sound like they are the same thing. Any clarification anyone?

WyomingKnott 08/07/2011 3:16 AM
Hide
-4+

11796pcs :
What's the difference between a circuit and a transistor? Are they the same because they sure sound like they are the same thing. Any clarification anyone?


Circuit: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_circuit
Transistor: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transistor

An electronic circuit is a collection of interconnected electronic elements. A transistor is one possible element. Or was this a troll?

WyomingKnott 08/07/2011 3:17 AM
Hide
-10+

dogman_1234 :
More tech to put into computers...pretty soon, computer will run on black holes with a single hydrogen atom processor. I will be dead when that happens though.


Probably as a result of being sucked into your computer's black hole!

Anonymous 08/07/2011 4:12 AM
Show
Anonymous 08/07/2011 4:19 AM
Show
wannaturnuptheheat 08/07/2011 8:26 AM
Hide
-1+

I have a passing knowledge of electronics, but the article just went right over my head... still, anything improving computing is, almost certainly, great news.

killakat 08/07/2011 9:19 AM
Hide
-4+

Hmm...

Light travels one direction... pattern reflected asymmetrically... reflected pattern travels from CPU to disco ball... disco party in room while gaming.

ujelly? ;)

demonhorde665 08/07/2011 10:12 AM
Hide
--1+

mister g :
I'll beleive it when I see it. There are so many technologies out there I doubt more than a few of them will make it into mass production. Still, I wish them the best of luck.



I agree, however photonic based comptuers wil totally make sense for some applications two words come to mind space exploration , one of the biggest hurdles to the space program is gettign newer tech that is reliable , and every thign i've read on photonic computing suggest it would take alot more punnishment than current transistor technologies.

Anonymous 08/07/2011 3:24 PM
Hide
-1+

Not a bad idea, as a thought the back scatter light can also be used to carry information. Like multi-plexing , using fractal mathmatics this light can be captured and processed back into binary data.

mb2bm55 08/08/2011 10:15 AM
Hide
--1+

DATA2 :
Not a bad idea, as a thought the back scatter light can also be used to carry information. Like multi-plexing , using fractal mathmatics this light can be captured and processed back into binary data.



I believe, but don't quote me,that the issue before with back scatter was canceling out/distorting the data stream by changing the phase. The information in the system is probably in the back scatter and I imagine the closer the back scatter function is to random (and therefore the less information carried), the better the system works.

demonhorde665 :
I agree, however photonic based comptuers wil totally make sense for some applications two words come to mind space exploration , one of the biggest hurdles to the space program is gettign newer tech that is reliable , and every thign i've read on photonic computing suggest it would take alot more punnishment than current transistor technologies.



The barriers to space exploration (other than adequate funding) are in the short term a lack of Pu-238 (the only suitable nucleide) for the RTG's that power long range probes beyond practical solar power range, and, in the long term, cheap-which means reusable- ferry vehicles to orbit as well as better, perhaps more exotic engine technologies for faster and longer range travel so that probes can be sent more consistently and technological advance on earth can be maximized sooner (i.e. no 90's tech orbiting Jupiter in this decade). We desperately need to develop powerful and efficient designs that leverage the far greater energy storage of nuclear power for these applications. Computing solutions, as of right now, are perhaps the only non-barrier. Current technology is far more than powerful enough, can be made very energy efficient (especially compared to the other equipment on the mission), is resilient, and because it works 'in the background' is easy to shield from cosmic radiation. The sensitivity of the exposed sensor to cosmic radiation is far more of an engineering concern. Due to the specialized tasks (no or little multitasking, no rendering especially for probes) the computers aboard these missions probably need to be no more powerful than 1/10 of the processing power of an iPhone. Any legitimate number crunching analysis of the data can be done by supercomputers on earth once its beamed back.

mb2bm55 08/08/2011 10:17 AM
Hide
--1+

edit: any information of the system in the back scatter probably represents potential interference and therefore data loss.

I hate the lack of an edit button. So hard to read in the little box b4 posting.

WyomingKnott 08/08/2011 3:26 PM
Hide
--1+

mb2bm55 wrote :

edit: any information of the system in the back scatter probably represents potential interference and therefore data loss.

I hate the lack of an edit button. So hard to read in the little box b4 posting.



At my age, I frequently turn up the browser to 125% of original size. Have you tried that?

CaedenV 08/08/2011 4:36 PM
Hide
--1+

there has been talk of photonic processing from back in the '80s when I was a kid. The #1 idea was to help update tech for space missions because it was harder to interrupt than the magnetic storage they were using (which literally was wire around magnets. Now we are using much more advanced tech that is not as sensitive to such problems, plus redundancy which helps, plus they are finding different materials which are more resilient, as well as better shielding tech. I am afraid now light based processing is still a long way off for practical use, it will live long as an interconnect (thunderbolt was supposed to be this), but photonic processing is still a long long way off.

eddieroolz 08/08/2011 9:08 PM
Hide
--1+

We take another step towards the future!

geef 08/09/2011 8:28 AM
Hide
--1+

killakat :
Hmm...Light travels one direction... pattern reflected asymmetrically... reflected pattern travels from CPU to disco ball... disco party in room while gaming.ujelly?



Oh no! I can just see someone's specially built case and system setup with a little disco ball hanging inside it and instead of an old disk drive on the front there is an 8-track player. :P

Wish I Was Wealthy 08/14/2011 4:55 PM
Hide
--1+

Let's hope that this idea will work,because they always come up with something new & most of the time they don't work...

Ads

Best offers

Newsletters


OK
Ads