Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

Samsung Pays Ericsson $650 Million for Phone Technologies

By - Source: Ericsson | B 12 comments

Samsung is making patent deals left and right.

Ericsson announced that it has signed an agreement with Samsung that ends all ongoing patent related legal disputes. The agreement includes an initial $650 million payment and ongoing royalty payments from Samsung for the term of the new multi-year license agreement.

"We are pleased that we could reach a mutually fair and reasonable agreement with Samsung. We always viewed litigation as a last resort," said Kasim Alfalahi, Chief Intellectual Property Officer at Ericsson. "This agreement allows us to continue to focus on bringing new technology to the global market and provides an incentive to other innovators to share their own ideas."

The cross license agreement covers patents relating to GSM, UMTS, and LTE standards for both networks and handsets, Ericsson revealed. The company currently owns more than 33,000 patents that span across key technology for 2G, 3G and 4G handsets and networks. The company also has over 100 active license agreements.

Samsung originally signed a licensing deal with Ericsson back in 2001, and then renewed it in 2007. However, in 2011 when the licensing deal was up for renewal, both parties were unable to reach an agreement. 

Ericsson sued Samsung in 2012, claiming that the Korean smartphone maker infringed on its patents regarding touchscreen functions, network efficiency and clearer voice transmission. Samsung accused Ericsson of demanding substantially higher royalty rates for the same patent portfolio. The new agreement ends the dispute.

"This agreement ends complaints made by both companies against each other before the International Trade Commission (ITC) as well as the lawsuits before the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas," reads Ericsson's press release.

The details of the agreement are confidential and will not be disclosed, Ericsson stated. The company also pledged to license its standard-essential patents on fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory (FRAND) terms.

Is Samsung trying to prevent another Apple-type dispute? Samsung just signed a patent agreement with Google, and another five-year agreement back in November with Nokia.

Display 12 Comments.
This thread is closed for comments
Top Comments
  • 15 Hide
    verenos , January 28, 2014 1:20 PM
    Way to go with the Title Kevin. I think you may have forgotten a couple of zeros!!
Other Comments
  • 15 Hide
    verenos , January 28, 2014 1:20 PM
    Way to go with the Title Kevin. I think you may have forgotten a couple of zeros!!
  • 6 Hide
    Jerky_san , January 28, 2014 1:21 PM
    Wow.. theres a difference between $650 and 650 million.. Should change the title..
  • 6 Hide
    usertests , January 28, 2014 1:24 PM
    Bargain!
  • 6 Hide
    de5_Roy , January 28, 2014 1:31 PM
    the headline reminds me of amd's bulldozer cpu's transistor count. :D 
  • 1 Hide
    ssalim , January 28, 2014 1:33 PM
    Change the title.Restore the "back" button to actually go back, not scroll to the next article!Lousy.
  • 0 Hide
    ocilfa , January 28, 2014 1:36 PM
    @de5_Roy: Nerd joke attempt: Failure
  • 0 Hide
    gmarsack , January 28, 2014 2:16 PM
    @ssalim, It's funny how Tom's site just keeps getting worse. I think developers of this site are actually grade-school students working on a class project.
  • 1 Hide
    brettms71 , January 28, 2014 4:32 PM
    Quote:
    Change the title.Restore the "back" button to actually go back, not scroll to the next article!Lousy.
    Well i actually like the new scroll down to the next article web design thingy for Toms. Instead of scrolling down, you can always click the back button, and click on the next link you want, or right click on the articles and open in new tab. Gives choices as far as i can see. I do like choice.
  • 0 Hide
    JD88 , January 28, 2014 6:54 PM
    Quote:
    Yet Samsung won't do that with Apple so it just keeps forking over billions when Apple sues...not too bright.


    Apple likely wants enormous sums for licensing its patents. Part of it is probably principle as well. Apple's lawsuits are founded in lies and triviality. Hell they even photoshop courtroom images of Samsung phones to make them look more similar to Apple devices. Apple gets away with murder just because of who they are. Samsung has really only lost one major patent suit to them. My guess is they are actually ahead when it comes to what they would be paying for licensing.
  • -1 Hide
    robochump , January 29, 2014 10:01 AM
    Samsung is a huge copy machine. Everything Samsung makes are copied from other well known brands and basically just takes the best design ideas and tweak them a little. Tell me one thing Samsung introduced that changed the market? Huge curved screens? No been done before.It is actually good to see Samsung actually making patent deals to look less scummy.@JD88 - Good story. Luckily actual products were shown in the courtroom and decision was made with actual hardware in hand and not pictures alone. Also only photochopped the size and not actual look of devices. No doubt Samsung copied. Samsung even copied Apple's packaging designs....lol!
  • 0 Hide
    JD88 , January 29, 2014 10:30 AM
    Quote:
    Samsung is a huge copy machine. Everything Samsung makes are copied from other well known brands and basically just takes the best design ideas and tweak them a little. Tell me one thing Samsung introduced that changed the market? Huge curved screens? No been done before.It is actually good to see Samsung actually making patent deals to look less scummy.@JD88 - Good story. Luckily actual products were shown in the courtroom and decision was made with actual hardware in hand and not pictures alone. Also only photochopped the size and not actual look of devices. No doubt Samsung copied. Samsung even copied Apple's packaging designs....lol!


    So basically you're admitting Apple lied in court and saying that it's fine because they showed actual hardware as well? True fanboyism at its finest trying to protect obvious liars and cheaters.

    I believe Apple is about to release a phone with a screen over 5 inches. Guess who was the first to do that over two years ago.

  • 0 Hide
    capt_taco , January 29, 2014 12:43 PM
    Patents for anything online or related to mobile phones really need to have an expiration date of like 6 months from the time they're issued. That's about the speed at which things go from innovative to common knowledge in that realm. Otherwise, all they produce are irrelevant lawsuits over anything and everything.