Ads
Ads
All about Desktops
 Latest Desktops articles
System Builder Marathon, Sept. '09: AMD System Value Compared

System Builder Marathon, Sept. '09: AMD System Value Compared
Our response to reader-demand for AMD systems focuses on the company’s penchant for gaming value across three budget classes. How do these fully-optimized systems compare to each other in ultimate performance and value? Read More

All Desktops articles

Newsletters


  • Ask your question about IT issues
  • Post
Popular Searches

Partners

The Games selection

crazy : PC Breakdown What is worst than a Fatal Error occuring during a game you did not save? Unleash your rage at your PC in this game. Blow it to pieces, it feels so...
kids : Bob Throw bubbles so as to make the ones that appear in the game disappear. For this, use the Right / Left arrow keys to duck or move about, and the...
Ads

Sponsored links

Windows Campaign Violating Trademark?

Next news
12:30 PM - September 30, 2008 by Aaron Heibert

Microsoft is being targeted by a startup company going by the name ‘G.ho.st’ in an apparent claim that Microsoft is violating a company trademark. The violation in question has to do with use of phrases such as “no walls” in its US$300 million Windows marketing and advertising campaign.

G.ho.st CEO Zvi Schreiber sent a letter to Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer last Tuesday asking that Microsoft stop using the phrases “life without walls,” “imagine without walls” and “imagine no walls” on its products, website, marketing materials, advertising and other promotions. It was also requested in writing that they stop using the phrases by the close of business last Thursday. To no surprise, it never happened.

As of Monday, Microsoft was still using the phrases in its campaign. Michael Marinello, a Microsoft spokesman, said via e-mail that the company has acknowledged it had gotten the letter from Schreiber but, “the allegation is without merit.” Schreiber claims that G.ho.st has been using the phrase “no walls” to describe its G.ho.st Virtual Computer product, which is a hosted operating system that runs in a virtual environment. This product is described by Schreiber as being a “conceptual alternative to Windows.”

To add to Schreiber’s request to stop using the phrases, G.ho.st has also requested that Microsoft publish, “in the same media where these marks were displayed or advertised” clarification that it has not licensed G.ho.st’s technology or trademark. They also asked that Microsoft mention that they do not use the same “features or benefits of the G.ho.st Virtual Computer.”

If none of that was enough, they are also asking Microsoft to negotiate a “good faith” license for the past usage of what the company believes is its trademark. At the time of publication G.ho.st had not responded to any requests about whether it would be taking legal action against Microsoft to resolve the matter.

For the record – G.ho.st has not officially trademarked the phrase and has only filed an application to do so, on the same day that it had sent Microsoft the original letter – last Tuesday.

Original source.

Source : Tom's Hardware

Talkback
Add your comment
megamanx00 09/30/2008 7:11 PM
Hide
-2+

Meh.

emp 09/30/2008 7:12 PM
Hide
-4+

Lovely... a starting company trying to make a quick buck out of microsoft. This is the very reason why innovation comes to a halt.

gm0n3y 09/30/2008 7:22 PM
Hide
-3+

"G.ho.st has not officially trademarked the phrase and has only filed an application to do so, on the same day that it had sent Microsoft the original letter – last Tuesday."

They haven't a chance. I guess they're just hoping for a decent settlement.

antonbar 09/30/2008 7:51 PM
Hide
-1+

Note that G.ho.st has the "No walls" trademark by the virtue of use (http://books.google.co.il/books?id=n3p-cmJ1mC0C&pg=PT282&lpg=PT282&dq=trademark+law+%22virtue+of+use%22&source=web&ots=HClc-d2CXq&sig=4dtISnXx8ob2XrkHj66DU2_kfwU&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=1&ct=result).

There's no need to register in order to get this right.

Cheers,
Anton.

gm0n3y 09/30/2008 8:25 PM
Hide
-1+

Yes, antonbar, but good luck winning a lawsuit against M$ without it.

Scooder 09/30/2008 8:27 PM
Hide
--2+

MS can royally eff up their advertising campaigns on their own, thank you very much. They don't need help.

TwoDigital 09/30/2008 9:41 PM
Hide
-1+

Anton: the case you reference is valid in-so-far as it shows that 'virtue of use' is required over 'intent to use' as a measure of defacto trademark. However, I'm not aware of a precedent for a non-tradmarked advertising slogan being upheld as a basis for a cease and desist action as G.ho.st is trying to pursue in this letter.

thogrom 09/30/2008 10:07 PM
Hide
-2+

lol lamer startup businesses... this is part of the reason Americas economy is crashing and burning... because they don't' innovate they just "steal"

Anonymous 09/30/2008 10:16 PM
Hide
-2+

Well, it looks that this G.ho.st is getting cheap publicity ...
What would they want more ? I bet no one ever heard about them before this "newsflash".

apoq 09/30/2008 10:55 PM
Hide
-2+

Am i the only one who finds registering catch phrases to be totally retarded??

starhoof 10/01/2008 3:31 AM
Hide
-2+

well... mabye i can sue them both too.... because my moto is "I live without walls" but i dont have it licensed.... but still....

zvi 10/01/2008 9:38 AM
Hide
-0+

In trademark law you accumulate rights by virtue of use - with or without registration. When G.ho.st applied for a registration recently, it was applying to register legal rights in the trademark NO WALLS which G.ho.st had already accumulated by public use of the trademark NO WALLS since April 2007, 17 months before Microsoft first used it.

Clearly Microsoft have no right to use the same trademark (or minor variations) as a much smaller competitor, and even though we are much smaller we will do our best to protect our intellectual property rights and not get bullied.

Zvi Schreiber
CEO, G.ho.st

ossie 10/01/2008 10:36 AM
Hide
-0+

micro$uxx just gets its own medicine...
lindows anyone?

Anonymous 10/01/2008 10:45 AM
Hide
-1+

Sorry, but to me it seems just like a little try to get big attention.
Trying to get company name mentioned everywhere.

I'm not talking of trademarks (no idea about USA's laws) - but just about trying to get cheap publicity.

antonbar 10/01/2008 11:00 AM
Hide
-0+

moriarty, would you seat aside quietly and watch MS stealing YOUR trademark, just because any attempt to protect it would look like a "little try to get big attention"?

lolcopter 10/01/2008 11:09 AM
Hide
-1+

HA HA. The claim is so broad. You americans will sue over anything. I hope MS crushes you and then buys you out and releases your product as freeware beta and then retrenches everyone and sell off the assets for 50c. PWNT. Everyone is suing everyone over every little thing because they have nothing worthwhile to bring to the market. Always the little fish trying to be a big fish.

smalltime0 10/02/2008 4:02 AM
Hide
-0+

"In trademark law you accumulate rights by virtue of use - with or without registration. When G.ho.st applied for a registration recently, it was applying to register legal rights in the trademark NO WALLS which G.ho.st had already accumulated by public use of the trademark NO WALLS since April 2007, 17 months before Microsoft first used it.

Clearly Microsoft have no right to use the same trademark (or minor variations) as a much smaller competitor, and even though we are much smaller we will do our best to protect our intellectual property rights and not get bullied.

Zvi Schreiber
CEO, G.ho.st"
I believe that is only true if the defacto trademark is actually known to anybody but the three people who made it.

Anonymous 11/29/2008 10:21 PM
Hide
-0+

It's true that you acquire trademarking rights by virtue of use, without or without registration. But according to Cornell's trademark resource page, those rights a *very* limited. The best thing to do is to register the trademark with the USPTO as soon as possible, instead of waiting until a trademark issue pops up.

Comments are closed on this page.

Sponsored links