Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

Notably Missing From The Line Card?

Gigabyte's Core i5 Contenders: P55-UD4P And P55-UD6
By
Notably Missing From The Line Card?

Proof positive that the UD6 exists. Fans of Gigabyte's past high-end efforts (EP45-DQ6, EX58-Extreme, P35-DQ6) know that this is going to be one of the company's most feature-rich (and expensive) P55-based offerings. What, exactly, will the company be piling onto it? Let's take a closer look!

Take note: the UD6 looks an awful lot like the P55-UD5 that Gigabyte describes in its Computex documentation. Could a simple name change be the key to this little mystery? All signs point to "it sure looks like it."

Also, bear in mind that losing 6 Gb/s SATA will likely mean changes to the way these boards look when they do ship. The competitive picture probably won't change much, though, if other vendors also drop Marvell's controller from their P55 designs in light of rumored issues with that component.

See more See less
Display all 23 comments.
This thread is closed for comments
  • 0 Hide
    mlcloud , July 15, 2009 6:08 AM
    Pity that it's gonna be hard to get anything stronger than 2x 4870s on these machines.
  • 0 Hide
    cangelini , July 15, 2009 6:18 AM
    I was running them with a pair of 4870 X2s without a problem. Though I can't publish numbers yet, you'd be surprised how close comparably-clocked i7 and i5-based machines will come.
  • 0 Hide
    paohyean , July 15, 2009 6:26 AM
    I think the eSATA ports at the back panel are the eSATA/USB combo ports as there are only 2 more headers for 4 front USB ports...
    =)
  • 0 Hide
    JeanLuc , July 15, 2009 8:39 AM
    cangeliniI was running them with a pair of 4870 X2s without a problem. Though I can't publish numbers yet, you'd be surprised how close comparably-clocked i7 and i5-based machines will come.


    Have you had a go at overclocking the new Lynnfields yet? It was reported in Custom PC magazine (a publication we get in the UK) that MSI engineers didn't find it hard to push the new Lynnfields to 5Ghz on air.
  • 0 Hide
    cangelini , July 15, 2009 8:42 AM
    Haven't yet JeanLuc. I'm waiting on two new coolers from a couple of different vendors that should allow a bit more overclocking flexibility. As of now, I'm currently limited to a fairly makeshift cooling setup that isn't really any good for overclocking.
  • 0 Hide
    h83 , July 15, 2009 10:34 AM


    Is there any chance that the new directx 11 cards will be so powerfull, that only one high end card will be sufficent to max out all the bandwith available, disabling the chance to run a crossfire/sli setup on this boards???
    I could be saying something really stupid, but that max 16x bandwith available seems fishy to mee...
  • 0 Hide
    JeanLuc , July 15, 2009 10:44 AM
    h83Is there any chance that the new directx 11 cards will be so powerfull, that only one high end card will be sufficent to max out all the bandwith available, disabling the chance to run a crossfire/sli setup on this boards??? I could be saying something really stupid, but that max 16x bandwith available seems fishy to mee...


    You have to remember on PCI express v2 x16 lanes is more like x32 lanes since PCI express V2 offers twice the bandwidth for the same amount of lanes (v1 can handle 250Mb's per lane V2 500mb's per lane). Now say if ATI's 5870 was twice as quick as the HD 4870 there would still be enough bandwidth in a PCI express X16 v1 lane to run that card without any troubles.
  • -1 Hide
    Kill@dor , July 15, 2009 1:55 PM
    I'm not sure there is much of a difference between Core i5 and i7...i mean of course we will wait for the results, i just don't see a big difference.
  • 0 Hide
    Hanin33 , July 15, 2009 3:10 PM
    nice boards.. wish they would produce some with 10 or more SATA ports... for the data storage packrats that some of us are!
  • 2 Hide
    Anonymous , July 15, 2009 5:24 PM
    Regarding the need/want for dual gigabit ethernet on mainstream boards, I'd have to say there's quite a few features on these boards that's even less useful.

    Of the top of my head, in no particular order.

    Floppy.
    COM.
    PAR.
    PS2.
    PCI.
    PATA.
    Firewire.
    More SATA then the chipset already provide.

    When I bought my first PC motherboard in 2003/4 all these were already redundant. Six years down the line I've yet to find a use for any single one of the above and wince inwardly at having to pay, regardless of amount, for these features.

    Dual gigabit ethernet though, I could make use of that. Even more so with Teaming support.
  • 0 Hide
    JeanLuc , July 15, 2009 9:08 PM
    There's nothing wrong with PS2 ports. Trying using a text based Linux (such as DSL) with a USB keyboard and see how far you get. Even on my Windows machine I use USB to PS2 converters just so I can keep my USB ports spare.
  • 0 Hide
    San Pedro , July 15, 2009 11:52 PM
    I won't be surprised to see how i5 comes to i7. I figured that would be the case. The thing that would make nervous though is the upgrade path available for it.

    I won't be in the market for a whole new set up for a while though. So in the end I'll have to settle to upgrade to a C2Q when I have the extra funds and a little cooler weather here in which to overclock it.
  • 0 Hide
    San Pedro , July 15, 2009 11:54 PM
    Oh BTW for mouse and keyboard PS2 > USB.

    USB uses polling, so the more USB devices you have the lower performance you'll get out of it. PS2 doesn't it. It's still perfect for keyboards and mice.
  • 0 Hide
    Pei-chen , July 16, 2009 12:11 AM
    cangeliniHaven't yet JeanLuc. I'm waiting on two new coolers from a couple of different vendors that should allow a bit more overclocking flexibility. As of now, I'm currently limited to a fairly makeshift cooling setup that isn't really any good for overclocking.

    Is the i7 and i5 using different cooler holes? i7's are a bit further apart than C2D's so is i5's in between?
  • -1 Hide
    cangelini , July 16, 2009 12:37 AM
    Yup, 1366 and 1156 aren't compatible, though I'm sure many vendors will start including clips for i5, just as many include clips for AMD/Intel platforms today.
  • 0 Hide
    radiowars , July 16, 2009 2:53 AM
    I just bought an Intel i7 920 the other day. I hope that the 1156 version is just the same thing. Yesh, I'm starting to have buyer's remorse.
  • 0 Hide
    Anonymous , July 16, 2009 6:52 AM
    While I personally find PS2 utterly useless, as would the vast majority of uses that neither know of or would notice the difference between a PS2 or USB mouse and keyboard, I never said that it were.

    Just that's it's less useful than having two gigabit ethernet ports would be.

    Every argument I've seen so far, a total of two, in favor of PS2 relies on archaic issues - and I use the word issues very lightly here - that are only still around because motherboard makers haven't removed the legacy support quickly enough.

    Do you believe we'd even have any PCI audio cards on the market today if the ports had been taken off all mainstream motherboards in '06, two years after the introduction of PCIe?

    As for polling...

    SCSI > ATA
    BETAMAX > VHS

    I could go on but I'm sure the point has been made. Polling hasn't been an issue in this millennium, the vast majority of users don't make use of more than 3-4 USB devices and retaining legacy support for PS2 when USB does more for less doesn't make the least bit of sense.

    Especially when considering a mainstream motherboard, which the P55-based ones are.
  • 0 Hide
    kirvinb , July 16, 2009 7:19 AM
    WHY WHY WHY WHY WHY DO THEY KEEP GETTING RID OF THE DROP BAR NAVAGATION???
  • -1 Hide
    cangelini , July 16, 2009 7:22 AM
    kirvinbWHY WHY WHY WHY WHY DO THEY KEEP GETTING RID OF THE DROP BAR NAVAGATION???


    This is a picture story--you can navigate the whole thing using thumbnails at the top. In regular editorial content, the drop-bar is still there!
  • 0 Hide
    freak77power , July 16, 2009 4:37 PM
    i7 running on this socket but then i7 running on 1366 socket. Let's add i5 to it, holy crap..what a mess.
Display more comments