Page 1:SSD Capacities And Performance On The Move
Page 2:Flash SSD Versus Hard Drive
Page 3:Samsung SSD PB22-J (256 GB MLC Flash)
Page 4:Inside Samsung’s SSD
Page 5:Solidata X1-64 (64 GB SLC)
Page 6:Solidata X2-128 (128 GB MLC)
Page 7:Inside the Solidata SSDs
Page 8:New SSDs Comparison Table And Test Setup
Page 9:Access Time And I/O Performance
Page 11:PCMark Vantage Application Performance
Page 12:Power Consumption
Page 13: Efficiency: Performance Per Watt
PCMark Vantage Application Performance
The difference in application loading time is significant. Intel leads, and the others follow. Samsung’s new 256 GB drive still offers very impressive performance, while all other SSDs are clearly behind.
The SSD performance differences are less significant for gaming; Solidata looks quite good in this benchmark section.
The video editing benchmark uses the Windows Movie Maker and requires combined read and write operation. Clearly, Intel’s SLC-based X25-E is best suited for this type of workload. Solidata cannot impress here; Samsung does as well as the Intel X25-M.
The difference in Windows Vista startup throughput is significant; you can actually notice the bootup time differences between the individual drives.
The final ranking is very clear: Intel’s X25-E and X25-M SSDs are clearly superior, but the new Samsung PB22-J at 256 GB is close behind. All the others offer substantially less application performance.
- SSD Capacities And Performance On The Move
- Flash SSD Versus Hard Drive
- Samsung SSD PB22-J (256 GB MLC Flash)
- Inside Samsung’s SSD
- Solidata X1-64 (64 GB SLC)
- Solidata X2-128 (128 GB MLC)
- Inside the Solidata SSDs
- New SSDs Comparison Table And Test Setup
- Access Time And I/O Performance
- PCMark Vantage Application Performance
- Power Consumption
- Efficiency: Performance Per Watt