The Graphics Cards Articles
- 3dfx, Matrox and Nvidia take on the KryoTech Cool Athlon 800 MHz
- 32 Graphic Card Meltdown - Part One
- Video Guide Part 2: Applications for Companies
- Video Guide Part 1: Market Situation and Applications
- Review of the Matrox G400 MAX
- 3DNow! Enabled 3D Adapters - Which solution offers the best...
- 3D Chips and Cards
- NVIDIA rocks the Boat with TNT2
- Preview of 3Dfx Voodoo3
- Comparison of Graphics Cards with NVIDIA's RIVA TNT Chip
Benchmark Results - Shogo - 1024x768x16
1:02 PM - September 6, 1999 by
Silvino Orozco
Source: Tom's Hardware US – Keywords: 32, graphic, card, meltdown
Syndication:
Source: Tom's Hardware US – Keywords: 32, graphic, card, meltdown
Syndication:
Table of Contents:
Benchmark Results - Shogo - 1024x768x16

As we start to make things harder on the video cards, we can now see the powerhouses flex their muscles. With superior clock speeds the Hercules TNT2 Ultra and the Xentor32 take the leading spots. Most of the TNT2/Ultra cards follow the pack leaders as well as the Voodoo3 3500 and Matrox G400 MAX. Looking down the chart we see the acceptable performance drop off at the ATI AIW 128. In the Shogo test, we can already see that after 640x480 the Savage4 cards aren't cutting it anymore. If you're looking for DX performance above 640x480 then the Savage4 won't probably be your card of choice.
- Previous page Benchmark Results - Shogo - 640x480x16
- Next page Benchmark Results - Shogo - 1600x1200x16