The Graphics Cards Articles
- Real3D's Response to Does AGP Really Improve Performance?
- Use a 3Dfx card without picture quality loss
- Addendum to Banshee, Savage3D and TNT Preview
- AGP and Graphics Memory
- Preview of 3Dfx Voodoo Banshee, S3 Savage3D and NVIDIA RIVA TNT
- Does AGP Really Improve Performance?
- Graphic Chips Review April 98
- The Voodoo2 3D Chip from 3Dfx
- Creative Labs 3D Blaster Voodoo2
- NVIDIA Announces RIVA 128ZX
Forum
- Phenom as good or better than Intel in gaming?
- AMD pushes out three more triple-core chips!!
- AMD's architecture features
- Deneb in December
- How the CoolerMaster CM HAF 932?
- liquid cooling for 8800 gt sli and phenom 9850
- CPU Overheating HSF Questions
- 4870x2 Water Block
- E7200 3.31GHz, any more headroom?
- Should I air or water cool my gaming rig?-Please help!
3D Game Benchmark Results - Quake 2 Massive1
1:01 PM - August 18, 1998 by
Thomas Pabst
Source: Tom's Hardware US – Keywords: 3d, chips
Syndication:
Source: Tom's Hardware US – Keywords: 3d, chips
Syndication:
Table of Contents:
3D Game Benchmark Results - Quake 2 Massive1


The results speak for themselves. Voodoo2 still rules Quake 2, but Savage3D is coming pretty close. Banshee does not look as bad as some people suspected. 36 fps at 800x600 with a Celeron should be just fine.
TNT is again looking excellent with a P2 400, with a Celeron 266 it can only show off at 1024x768. Massive1 at 29 fps is not so bad though and playing Quake 2 at 1024x768 is anyway the best you can do, unless you want to get even higher.
- Previous page 3D Game Benchmark Results - Quake 2...
- Next page 3D Game Benchmark Results - Quake 2...