Download the Tom's Hardware App from the App Store
The reference for current tech news
Yes No
Signin with

Tom's Hardware Articles Related To RAID

by

Part 1 and 2 of our RAID Scaling Charts talk in detail about RAID 0, 1, 0+1, 5 and 6.

Apart from our RAID Scaling Charts, we provided a number of articles related to RAID earlier this year:

  • RAID Recovery: The Data Knight Kroll Ontrack to the Rescue
    In the event of catastrophic hard drive failure, only professional data recovery can help. During a visit to Kroll Ontrack we gained insight into how data can even be restored from a crashed RAID array.
  • Parallel Processing, Part 2: RAM and HDDs
    The second part of this article series deals with the differences between single and dual channel memory, and the performance benefits of using RAID with two or even four hard drives.
  • The RAID Migration Adventure
    All RAID arrays aren’t created equal, and as a result you may not be able to keep using your existing configuration when you update your platform.
  • Opting for RAID Level Migration
    Many SATA systems allow you to upgrade to RAID. We used hard drives with Intel and Nvidia chipsets to see how well RAID level migration could work. Our goal was simply to make storage more reliable.
  • Cheap RAID Ravages WD Raptor
    A quick hard drive such as Western Digital’s Raptor noticeably accelerates your PC, but is it still the best choice for enthusiasts?
  • RAID Boxes Run Riot
    We looked at two RAID-based external storage appliances from easyRAID and Sans Digital. They deliver increased performance, but with annoying noise levels.
  • The 2.5" vs. 3.5" RAID Challenge
  • Meet Drobo: A Data-Saving Robot
    Conventional RAID solutions can be expensive, difficult to handle and hard to upgrade. Data Robotics offers you an alternative: Drobo, a robot that will fix your storage problems.
  • Acard’s Small Business RAID Appliance
    Acard’s rackmount storage appliance uses SATA hard drives, but connects to the host system with an UltraSCSI interface. Is this the right mix for small businesses?
  • RAID on Rye
    Who said only PCs could be modded, and that server designs had to be boring? THG sits down with designer Dave Goeke, who discusses his pride and joy: a Linux file server with RAID storage in a working toaster. Or is it really a toaster in which you can store your files?

A UPS unit is extremely important to avoid data loss due to power outages.

Share:
4
Comments
X
Submit

Comments
alanmeck 03/16/2011 5:46 PM
Hide
-0+

I've found conflicting opinions re stripe size, so I did my own tests (though I don't have precision measuring tools like you guys). My raid 0 is for gaming only, so all I cared about was loading time. So I used a stopwatch to measure the difference in loading times on Left 4 Dead when using 64kb and 128kb stripe size. Results, by map:
64kb 128kb
No Mercy No Mercy
Level 1: 9.15 Level 1: 9.08
Level 2: 8.31 Level 2: 8.38
Level 3: 8.24 Level 3: 8.31
Level 4: 8.45 Level 4: 8.45
Level 5: 6.56 Level 5: 6.63
Death Toll Death Toll
Level 1: 7.75 Level 1: 7.89
Level 2: 7.19 Level 2: 7.26
Level 3: 9.01 Level 3: 8.94
Level 4: 9.36 Level 4: 9.36
Level 5: 9.5 Level 5: 9.64
Dead Air Dead Air
Level 1: 7.68 Level 1: 7.47
Level 2: 7.96 Level 2: 8.03
Level 3: 9.08 Level 3: 8.87
Level 4: 8.17 Level 4: 8.17
Level 5: 6.98 Level 5: 6.84
Blood Harvest Blood Harvest
Level 1: 8.24 Level 1: 8.17
Level 2: 7.33 Level 2: 7.33
Level 3: 7.68 Level 3: 7.68
Level 4: 8.45 Level 4: 8.31
Level 5: 7.89 Level 5: 8.1

I'm using software raid 0 on my GA-870A-UD3 mobo. The results for me were almost identical (128kb was faster by .07 seconds total). That being the case, I erred on the side of 128kb in order to reduce the potential for write amplification (I'm using 3x ocz vertex 2's). What's remarkable is that, despite using the stopwatch to measure times manually, the results were always either identical, or separated by intervals of .07 seconds. Weird, huh? Btw thanks to Tomshardware, you guys give a lot of helpful info.

anonymous 09/18/2011 10:13 PM
Hide
-0+

Does anyone want a slower system? why do we have to choose? why do we not just get the fastest option without having to do this? or is that to simple!

anonymous 01/25/2012 6:00 PM
Hide
-0+

I wish we could see what 256 does. Or even 1024 but that just sounds like a waste of space unless your doing Video or Music. Maybe gameing but RAM and bandwidth will always give you an edge if no one is hacked the game.

Shomare 11/18/2012 12:35 AM
Hide
-0+

I agree...can you please look into getting one of the new Areca 1882 controllers with 1+GB of mem on it and a dual core 800Ghz processor? We would like to see the larger stripe sizes, the larger processor, and the larger memory footprint's results! :)

Best offers

All about Storage Solutions
 Storage Solutions performance charts
All Storage Solutions charts

Newsletters


OK