Page 1:Steamroller, GCN, HSA, 28 nm: Oh My!
Page 2:Meet The Compute Core
Page 3:A More Capable GPU: GCN Surfaces In Kaveri
Page 4:Enabling HSA On The Kaveri APU
Page 5:Test Hardware And Software
Page 6:Gaming: BioShock Infinite And Grid 2
Page 7:Gaming: The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim And World Of Warcraft
Page 8:Dual Graphics: Does Kaveri Fix CrossFire's Problems?
Page 9:Results: Synthetics
Page 10:Results: Content Creation
Page 11:Results: Adobe CC
Page 12:Results: Productivity
Page 13:Results: Compression Apps
Page 14:Results: Media Encoding
Page 15:Results: Power Consumption And Efficiency
Page 16:Hoping The Best Is Yet To Come
Results: Power Consumption And Efficiency
I’d argue that this stuff is more fun than the actual performance benchmarks. We get to see how quickly each processor cruises through our suite, we measure instantaneous power consumption along the way, and then we're able to calculate what that data means to overall efficiency in the tests we’re running.
The line chart is admittedly messy, but it shows you that there’s actually something being logged as our benchmarks run. Each platform has 30 minutes of idle time inserted at the end of the suite, where we record power on the Windows desktop, just to ensure we’re not exclusively reporting results under load.
The outlier is AMD’s 45 W A8-6500T, which maintains remarkably low power draw through our workloads, but takes a long time to finish up. It’s a bold strategy, Cotton. Let’s see if it pays off in the efficiency chart.
Hidden under all of those lines, the A10-7850K (red) and A8-7600 (black) track very closely throughout the scripted sequence, even though one is a 95 W part and the other has a 65 W TDP. I went back and re-ran the -7600 using Disabled, 65 W, and 45 W options in ASRock’s Configurable TDP firmware setting, verifying that this feature works as it should.
Averaging power consumption confirms that the Kaveri-based parts end up really, really close to each other. Given the A10-6800K’s average use almost 20 W higher, the -7850K doesn’t appear to exploit all of its power budget to max out performance.
Both the Core i5-4670K and Core i3-4330 average lower power consumption through the Tom’s Hardware benchmark suite. Now we want to know how long each processor takes to finish the job.
Those same Intel CPUs end up being the first- and second-fastest through our benchmarks.
We can’t script the game tests, so 3D performance isn’t a component in these charts. You’re seeing the result of content creation, media encoding, productivity, and compression workloads. Any time you fold in gaming and compare AMD's Radeon R7 engine to HD Graphics 4600, the Kaveri design wins consistently. Whether or not an APU can deliver the frame rate, detail setting, and resolution you want to use is another matter entirely. Still, context is important here because Steamroller just doesn’t do much for the high end of Kaveri as it exists today. There’s a lot more to like at lower power levels when you compare inside of AMD’s portfolio. But once you add low-power Core i3s to the mix, again, Intel comes out on top.
Multiply power consumption across the duration of our test suite and this is what you get. The flagship A10-7850K is notably more efficient than the Richland-based A10-6800K, partly because it’s a little faster, but mostly as a result of lower power use. That doesn’t stop the $140 Core i3 from burning close to 50% of the A10’s energy, though.
- Steamroller, GCN, HSA, 28 nm: Oh My!
- Meet The Compute Core
- A More Capable GPU: GCN Surfaces In Kaveri
- Enabling HSA On The Kaveri APU
- Test Hardware And Software
- Gaming: BioShock Infinite And Grid 2
- Gaming: The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim And World Of Warcraft
- Dual Graphics: Does Kaveri Fix CrossFire's Problems?
- Results: Synthetics
- Results: Content Creation
- Results: Adobe CC
- Results: Productivity
- Results: Compression Apps
- Results: Media Encoding
- Results: Power Consumption And Efficiency
- Hoping The Best Is Yet To Come