Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

Features Comparison

Five AMD 890FX-Based Motherboards Compared
By
890GX Motherboard Features
 ASRock
890FX Deluxe3
Asus Crosshair IV
Formula
Biostar
TA890FXE
Gigabyte
890FXA-UD7
MSI
890FXA-GD70
PCB Revision1.031.01G5.02.01.1
ChipsetAMD 890FX/SB850AMD 890FX/SB850AMD 890FX/SB850AMD 890FX/SB850AMD 890FX/SB850
Voltage Regulator10 Phases10 Phases6 Phases10 Phases5 Phases
BIOSP1.40 (04/23/2010)0801 (05/03/2010)506 (05/06/2010)F1 (04/06/2010)V1.2 (04/26/2010)
200.0 MHz BCLK200.0 MHz (+0.0 MHz)200.7 MHz (+0.35%)200.0 MHz (+0.0 MHz)200.0 MHz (+0.0 MHz)200.0 MHz (+0.0 MHz)
Clock GeneratorICS 9LPRS477CKLICS 9LPRS477CKLRealtek RTM880N-793Realtek RTM880N-793Realtek RTM880N-793
Internal Interfaces
PCIe x16 (lanes)3 (16/16/4)4 (16-1-16-4
or 16-8-8-4)
4 (16-1-16-4)6 (16-4-0-1-16-0
or 8-4-8-1-8-8)
5 (16-0-4-16-0
or 8-4-8-8-8)
PCIe x1/x42/00/00/00/01/0
Legacy PCI12211
USB 2.02 (4 ports)3 (5 ports)3 (6 ports)3 (6 ports)3 (6 ports)
IEEE-139411112
Serial Port1None111
Parallel PortNoneNoneNone1None
FloppyYesNoNoYesNo
Ultra ATA 1331 (2 drives)None1 (2 drives)1 (2 drives)1 (2 drives)
SATA 3 Gb/sNone1None21
SATA 6 Gb/s86566
4-Pin Fan28121
3-Pin Fan3None234
FP-AudioYesYesYesYesYes
CD-AudioYesNoNoYesNo
S/PDIF I/OOutput OnlyOutput OnlyOutput OnlyBothOutput Only
Power ButtonYesYesYesYesYes
Reset ButtonYesYesYesYesYes
CLR_CMOS ButtonJumper OnlyJumper OnlyJumper OnlyYesJumper Only
Diagnostics PanelNumericPass/Fail LEDsNumericNumericNumeric
I/O Panel Connectors
P/S 221212
USB 2.04766 (2 Shared w/eSATA)6 (1 Shared w/eSATA)
USB 3.042None22
IEEE-13941112None
NetworkSingleSingleSingleDualDual
eSATA11121 (Shared w/USB)
CLR_CMOS ButtonYesYesNoNoYes
Digital Audio OutOptical + CoaxialOpticalOptical + CoaxialOptical + CoaxialOptical + Coaxial
Digital Audio InNoneNoneNoneNoneNone
Analog Audio66666
Mass Storage Controllers
Chipset SATA6 x SATA 6 Gb/s6 x SATA 6 Gb/s6 x SATA 6 Gb/s6 x SATA 6 Gb/s6 x SATA 6 Gb/s
Chipset RAID Modes0, 1, 5, 100, 1, 5, 100, 1, 5, 100, 1, 5, 100, 1, 5, 10
Add-In SATA88SE9123 PCIe
2 x SATA 6 Gb/s
JMB363 PCIe
1 x SATA 3 Gb/s
1 x eSATA 3 Gb/s
NoneJMB363 PCIe
2 x SATA 3 Gb/s
JMB362 PCIe
2 x eSATA 3 Gb/s
JMB363 PCIe
1 x SATA 3 Gb/s
1 x eSATA 3 Gb/s
Add-In Ultra ATAVT6330 PCIeNoneVT6330 PCIeJMB363 PCIeJMB363 PCIe
USB 3.02x NEC D720200F1
4 x 5.0 Gb/s
NEC D720200F1NoneNEC D720200F1
2 x 5.0 Gb/s
NEC D720200F1
IEEE-1394VT6330 PCIe
2 x 400 Mb/s
VT6315N PCIe
2 x 400 Mb/s
VT6330 PCIe
2 x 400 Mb/s
TSB43AB23 PCI
3 x 400 Mb/s
VT6315N PCIe
2 x 400 Mb/s
Gigabit Ethernet
Primary LANRTL8111E PCIeMarvell 88E8059 PCIeRTL8111DL PCIeRTL8111D PCIeRTL8111DL PCIe
Secondary LANNoneNoneNoneRTL8111D PCIeRTL8111DL PCIe
Audio
HD Audio CodecVIA VT2020VIA VT2020ALC892ALC889ALC889
DDL/DTS ConnectUnspecifiedUnspecifiedUnspecifiedDolby Digital LiveUnspecified
Display all 75 comments.
This thread is closed for comments
Top Comments
  • 12 Hide
    makwy2 , June 1, 2010 6:41 AM
    Great article. Very informative!

    One little suggestion, in the features comparison it would be nice to include a row on the cost of these mobos. As one eventually reads in the Conclusion there is quite a bit of difference between them in this area but if this 'stat' was featured I would be able to focus only on the boards within my price range. I know that it would be hard to keep up to date and such but it would really be a service to those of us who are not made of money.
Other Comments
  • 12 Hide
    makwy2 , June 1, 2010 6:41 AM
    Great article. Very informative!

    One little suggestion, in the features comparison it would be nice to include a row on the cost of these mobos. As one eventually reads in the Conclusion there is quite a bit of difference between them in this area but if this 'stat' was featured I would be able to focus only on the boards within my price range. I know that it would be hard to keep up to date and such but it would really be a service to those of us who are not made of money.
  • 7 Hide
    wintermint , June 1, 2010 6:43 AM
    I own a gigabyte mobo and I'm happy with it :) 
  • 2 Hide
    Lmeow , June 1, 2010 6:57 AM
    I'd personally go for the Crosshair IV Formula simply because of the kickass colour scheme. :D 
  • 2 Hide
    xurwin , June 1, 2010 7:56 AM
    uhuh! i really like the crosshair IV formula for its design and Awesome color! wish every mobo has a creativity design
  • 0 Hide
    joytech22 , June 1, 2010 8:19 AM
    Ugh this year i already made some horrible decisions, honestly didn't think the Asus board would look so beautiful! i really wanted that board too but i already ordered a different Asus board for SLi support (with AM3)..

    *Sigh*
  • 3 Hide
    liquidsnake718 , June 1, 2010 9:24 AM
    interesting and very persuasive article as i was seriously thinking of getting an AMD based system instead just a few weeks ago until I finally bought a new processor. I still dont have the mb yet but reading this article made me want to get the Asus or the Gigabyte board. I would have possibly gone for a phenom II x4 or even x6 but its too late! What a good read this was and I am slowly understanding the value oriented target market that AMD and ATi offer to beginners and enthusiast builders and overclockers.

    Truly.... if not for getting my i7930 I would have bought these motherboards first!

    I have just purchased a i7 chip x58 chip but reading this article actually made me regret it! I have yet to buy a mb as the ud4 isnt available in Manila yet.

    I will build this pc slowly but make it the best possible in the timeframe while I eke out the best of my current c2d system and netbook in the meantime.
  • 5 Hide
    alexcheng , June 1, 2010 9:36 AM
    URRGH!!! X58 or 890FX?!?!! AMD and Intel are causing me a mental breakdown!!!!!!!
  • 1 Hide
    dEAne , June 1, 2010 9:52 AM
    I have a gigabyte mobo and Its good, One thing I don't like is that DDR3 cannot use past 1333 range if you want to use 1600 only few slots are available.
  • -3 Hide
    aquicl , June 1, 2010 10:16 AM
    wow
  • 2 Hide
    xurwin , June 1, 2010 10:51 AM
    dEAneI have a gigabyte mobo and Its good, One thing I don't like is that DDR3 cannot use past 1333 range if you want to use 1600 only few slots are available.
    now now. breathe slowly. ASUS CROSSHAIR IV FORMULA 890FX!!!
  • 0 Hide
    sohei , June 1, 2010 11:21 AM
    hello guys! what does it mean ? 1.47v-1,50v is not safe 10x for answer
    "Based on reader recommendations for long-term operation of C3-stepping Phenom II cores, we’ve dropped today’s O/C voltage to 1.45V."
  • 0 Hide
    heroictofu , June 1, 2010 12:02 PM
    I tried the ASUS Crosshair IV motherboard, but I was one of the unlucky few that got hit with a bad northbridge heatsink. The northbridge was idling up to 70C. Not very fun. So, I RMA'd it and got the MSI 890FXA-GD70 and couldn't be happier! It stays incredibly cool.
  • 8 Hide
    terrybear , June 1, 2010 12:09 PM
    AlexChengURRGH!!! X58 or 890FX?!?!! AMD and Intel are causing me a mental breakdown!!!!!!!

    liquidsnake718interesting and very persuasive article as i was seriously thinking of getting an AMD based system instead just a few weeks ago until I finally bought a new processor. I still dont have the mb yet but reading this article made me want to get the Asus or the Gigabyte board. I would have possibly gone for a phenom II x4 or even x6 but its too late! What a good read this was and I am slowly understanding the value oriented target market that AMD and ATi offer to beginners and enthusiast builders and overclockers.Truly.... if not for getting my i7930 I would have bought these motherboards first!I have just purchased a i7 chip x58 chip but reading this article actually made me regret it! I have yet to buy a mb as the ud4 isnt available in Manila yet. I will build this pc slowly but make it the best possible in the timeframe while I eke out the best of my current c2d system and netbook in the meantime.


    Here's a nice little fact for anyone whom doesn't know it yet ... Intel has made it clear that Core i5 & Core i7 platforms next year are being replaced with Core i6 ( sand bridge) equivelents which means your current setups with Core i5/i7 basing is done & not forwards compatible.

    with that said when sledgehammer hit next year your AM3 platform will have AM3 versions of the cpu for it.
  • -4 Hide
    ivaroeines , June 1, 2010 1:30 PM
    I love the fact that you seem to be the only hardware website that puts a finger on the default overclocking that some motherboards do. I dont know if its done deliberatly or are if it happens by accident, but anyway its a clear sign of poor quality. That the engineers even cant get their clocks to run at the right speed only mean one thing, poor engineers, i doubt if i wanna buy products designed by people who clearly cant do their job.
  • 0 Hide
    MQ1hunter , June 1, 2010 1:33 PM
    I just bought a Asrock....
    While the board is great, I did have an issue with VIA 2020 HD sound, and still do. I am still in belief this a driver issue/ati. Googling showed how many other people, ran into ATI taking over their sound!!!
  • -2 Hide
    enzo matrix , June 1, 2010 1:59 PM
    "AMD’s flagship northbridge has evolved into the 890FX"

    What is this? Pokemon?
  • -5 Hide
    Poisoner , June 1, 2010 2:27 PM
    kelemvor4No SLI. Waste of time.


    It would be nice to see more nVidia chipsets for AMD boards.
  • 8 Hide
    devrahul , June 1, 2010 2:55 PM
    Quote:
    "AMD’s flagship northbridge has evolved into the 890FX"

    What is this? Pokemon?

    LOL gave me good laugh, that is one reason i freaking enjoy reading comments so much.
  • 5 Hide
    noob2222 , June 1, 2010 3:06 PM
    Where is the comparison to the older 790FX? Would be nice to know if there was any improvements to the 790 other than adding of the sata6 and usb3. Would be informative to know whether its worth it or not.

    As far as layout, asrock is no good. Gigabyte isn't bad, but did they include the bridge to go from slot 1 to 5 for dual CF on the 16x lanes?
Display more comments