All conventional application benchmarks involving a single application at a time, as well as the multitasking tests, were run on the MSI S271 with the Turion 64 X2 TL-60 processor.
Since the DivX 6.1 codec is faster on multi-core systems, the laptops equipped with dual-core processors swept the table. AMD's 2 GHz Turion 64 X2 TL-60 was even a tick faster than Intel's Core Duo T2500, which operates at the same clock speed.
Adobe Photoshop CS 2
In this test, the AMD and Intel dual-core laptops were faster than a single-core system with the same clock speed. However, neither the Turion 64 X2 nor Intel's Core Duo could beat the Pentium M 780 with a higher clock speed. This is most likely because only three of the seven filters of the test script are optimized for multi-threading. In other words, a dual-core laptop like the MSI271 can initially gain some ground while applying the three optimized filters. However, the Sonoma system with the single-core Pentium M780 is faster with the four non-optimized filters due to its higher clock speed, and eventually wins the race.
AVG Anti-Virus 7.1
Obviously, this application is not optimized for multi-core environments.
- AMD Now Sells Laptops Online!
- Double Power, DDR2 Memory Controller, And Variable Memory Bandwidth
- Why Two Execution Units In "one" CPU?
- L2 Cache Management In Alpha Processors
- Model Nomenclature, Models, And Pricing
- New S1 Socket
- Test Systems From MSI And HP
- Test Systems From MSI And HP, Continued
- Benchmarks And Settings
- Extended Benchmark Suite
- ABBYY FineReader 8
- Application Test Results
- ABBYY FineReader Pro 8.0
- Pinnacle Studio 10 Plus
- Office Applications: SYSmark 2004 SE
- SYSmark 2004 SE, Continued
- Battery Life: MobileMark 2005
- MobileMark 2005 Battery Life And Performance Rating: Conclusions
- Summary: Second Choice, If At All