Best offers
|
Core i7 I7-920 Quad Core Processor... | $349.99 Dell Home More info |
|
Phenom II X4 965 Black Edition Quad... | $195.99 Newegg.com More info |
|
Core i5 750 Qaud Core Processor... | $199.99 Newegg.com More info |
|
Core i7 Extreme Edition I7-975 Quad... | $1195.70 PC Connection More info |
|
Athlon II X2 Dual Core Processor... | $76.00 Newegg.com More info |
- amd athlon 64 x2 vs intel core 2 duo
- is phenom better than athlon
- amd athlon x2 dual core vs intel core 2 duo
- athlon 64 x2 vs core 2 duo
- triple core vs quad core
- phenom 2 vs athlon x2
- intel core 2 quad q9000 benchmark
- amd phenom vs core 2 duo
- amd phenom vs. athlon
- phenom vs. athlon
- triple core processor vs dual core
- phenom vs core 2 quad
- amd 64 x2 vs amd phenom
- q9000 vs duo
- intel core 2 quad q9000 review
Partners
The Games selection
crazy :
PC Breakdown
What is worst than a Fatal Error occuring during a game you did not save? Unleash your rage at your PC in this game. Blow it to pieces, it feels so...
|
adventure :
Scoobydoo: Episode 2
The sequel of Scooby and Sammy's adventures. Same principle as in the previous episode (available on this website). Click on "Instructions" to see...
|
Sponsored links
AMD Phenom vs. Athlon Core Shootout
- Email |
- Print |
- Comments (3) |
- Share
Table of contents
- 1 – Is Phenom Really Faster Than Athlon?
- 2 – Phenom Models and Details
- 3 – Phenom Models and Details, Continued
- 4 – Test Components & Test Experience
- 5 – AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+ at 2.6 GHz
- 6 – Asus M3A32-MVP with AMD790FX Chipset
- 7 – Athlon 64 X2 vs. Phenom
- 8 – Test Setup
- 9 – Benchmark Results
- 10 – Gaming Benchmarks, Continued
- 11 – Application Benchmarks
- 12 – Audio Benchmarks
- 13 – Video Benchmarks
- 14 – Windows Vista Experience Index
- 15 – Synthetic Benchmarks
- 16 – Synthetic Benchmarks, Continued
- 17 – Conclusion

AMD removed the core count suffix X2, X3 and X4 from the logo and changed its nomenclature instead: 9000 models have four cores, while the upcoming triple cores have a 7000 model number.
AMD has had a difficult year. Not only did the long anticipated Phenom processor arrive at considerably lower clock speeds than expected (2.3 GHz instead of 3 GHz), but the current stepping of the so-called Barcelona core is afflicted with a nasty bug. While there are workarounds for it, only an updated stepping will allow AMD to resume quad core processor deliveries in the server segment. The fact that the quad core doesn't deliver sufficient performance to attack Intel at the high-end doesn't help either. As a consequence of these problems, AMD has had to readjust its product strategy, and position the processor together with the new Spider platform in the mainstream. Despite all of the issues, though, Phenom isn't as bad as it may appear, as our comparison between the Phenom and the Athlon 64 X2 shows. Compare Prices on AMD Phenom Processors
In fact, AMD has a pretty significant advantage over Intel when it comes to upgrading existing systems with a quad core processor. While Intel has been quick with launching new platforms for each and every new processor generation due to modified requirements, AMD has not changed the specifications for Socket AM2 at all. As a consequence, it is technically possible to deploy a quad core Phenom processor into a Socket AM2 motherboard that has been running an Athlon 64 or Athlon 64 X2 - all you need is a BIOS update. This doesn't work in every case - some motherboards may not be able to handle the Phenoms' power requirements of 95 or 125 W - but most enthusiast motherboards can be upgraded from a single or dual core to a quad core processor easily.
The upgrade situation definitely requires some attention, as both AMD and Intel are roughly half a year away from the next significant technology update. AMD will introduce Socket AM3, which will bring with it DDR3 memory, while Intel's next-generation Nehalem will finally integrate the memory controller with the processor. Knowing this, even the upcoming Core 2 Duo E8000 or Core 2 Quad Q9000 series have to be seen as interim products on the way to the next generation, despite the certainty that these will outperform the existing Core 2 products by roughly 10%.
- AM3 cpu on AM2 mobo [CPU & Components]
- AMD user going AMD, how is this setup? [CPU & Components]
- Athlon x2 [CPU & Components]
- Socket A Sempron vs. Socket AM2+ Phenom [CPU & Components]
- Performance impact of AM2 HyperTransport speed on AM3 cpus [CPU & Components]
Questions? Ask Tom's community!
Sponsored links
Related forums topics
- AMD Athlon or Phenom?
- AMD Phenom or Athlon 64 X2 with my 4870
- NVIDIA 8300 or AMD 780G for Phenom x3 / athlon x2
- Athlon X2 or AMD Phenom X3?
- AMD Phenom X4 9750 Heating Problem HELP!!!
- How much can i overclock an amd x2 4600+?
- AMD 9950 BE OC Share Info
- GPU Cooldown.
- Can my S939 heatsink and fan fit a new AMD processor?
- I need serious ASUS Bios update help
- Noob needs a little help updating m2n-sli deluxe bios
- Hubby's Christmas Present Need to Know if I got it Right
- what are the differences... AMD 790 vs nForce 780
- Will this support amd phenom (ms-7327)





its architecture it fine but
it is clock speed the phenom lacks. if amd can just bump its speed up to around 3ghz-3.6ghz then it would make good competition towards faster intels. i can conclude from this benchmark that if you buy an phenom 9850 and clock it around 3ghz you have much more horse power then you would have with an athlon x2 6000+ however some benchmarks might tell you something else it makes sence if you use 1066mhz memory or just 800mhz mem
i wish tom's would update this topic with new benchmarks on the amd phenom 9850be. i'd like to know if it's more stable now that the "nasty bug" has been remedied with the march 2008 product line refresh.
Well this review says its not much more performance. I'm upgrading from 939 and actually thinking of getting the $60 AMD Athlon 64 X2 7750 (AM2+) and OC it to at least 3ghz and run 1066 memory. I'd rather save the money for the future rather than have a few extra FPS.
Intel's core i7 really is clearly the better processor with more headroom, but AMD has always had them in the price to performance ratio department. AMD isn't going away and perhaps they can make a better processor like when Athlon 64 came out or at least close the gap and let their price to performance ratio carry them the rest of the way. (http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/overclock-phenom-ii,2119.html)