AMD Ryzen 7 1800X CPU Review
-
Page 1:The Ryzen Debut
-
Page 2:AMD SenseMI Suite & XFR
-
Page 3:The AM4 Platform
-
Page 4:Overclocking & Test Setup
-
Page 5:Cache Testing
-
Page 6:Ashes of the Singularity & Battlefield 4
-
Page 7:Hitman, Project CARS & Metro: Last Light
-
Page 8:Results: Desktop & Office
-
Page 9:Results: Workstation
-
Page 10:Results: Scientific & Engineering Computations And HPC
-
Page 11:Results: Power Consumption And Temperatures
-
Page 12:Conclusion
Hitman, Project CARS & Metro: Last Light
Hitman (2016)
Hitman scales well during our benchmark, obviously responding to clock rate and core count. The Ryzen 7 1800X receives a boost when we disable SMT, but it still lags the field under the influence of a slight overclock to 3.8 GHz.
The FX-8350, which experiences severe frame time variance, highlights how far AMD has come in a few short generations on the performance front.
-
01
-
02
-
03
-
Hitman - FrameTime - 1920x1080 Ultra
-
Hitman - FrameTimeVariance - 1920x1080 Ultra
-
Hitman - Unevenness - 1920x1080 Ultra
-
08
-
07
The Core i7-7700K takes the lead with a fixed 3.8 GHz frequency, but Ryzen closes the gap as resolution increases. The 1800X at its stock clock rate shows up well behind Intel's Core i7-6900K, but to keep things in perspective, you get 87% of Broadwell-E's performance for less than half of its price with Ryzen 7 1800X. Conversely, you can opt for the $350 Core i7-7700K and enjoy more performance than AMD's 1800X in many popular titles.
-
image049
-
image047
-
image053
-
Hitman - FrameTime - 2560x1440 Ultra
-
Hitman - Une venness - 2560x1440 Ultra
-
Hitman - FrameTimeVariance - 2560x1440 Ultra
-
08
-
07
The gap narrows even more between Ryzen and Intel's processors as we shift to 2560x1440. The Core i7-6900K and -7700K are still faster, but the utility question surfaces again: if you specifically need an eight-core processor for content creation, you can go with the 1800X and give up some gaming alacrity, or, if high frame rates are top priority, buy the Core i7-7700K knowing it won't be as fast elsewhere.
Project CARS
-
01
-
02
-
03
-
PjC - FrameTime - 1920x1080 Ultra
-
PjC - Unevenness - 1920x1080 Ultra
-
PjC - FrameTimeVariance - 1920x1080 Ultra
-
07
-
08
Intel's Core i7-7700 takes a big lead during our Project CARS testing, followed by the Core i7-6900K. AMD's Ryzen 7 1800X with a fixed 3.8 GHz frequency slides past the SMT-disabled results, suggesting the game works well with AMD's SMT implementation.
-
image049
-
image047
-
image053
-
PjC - FrameTime - 2560x1440 Ultra
-
PjC - FrameTimeVariance - 2560x1440 Ultra
-
PjC - Unevenness - 2560x1440 Ultra
-
08
-
07
Project CARS delivers similar maximum frame rates, even at a higher resolution, which illustrates just how CPU-constrained the game is. The 1800X without SMT and the 1800X under Microsoft's High Performance power profile swap positions on the chart, but are only separated by 0.1 FPS.
The FX-8350 suffers significant performance variation, while Ryzen 7 1800X provides a smoother experience using the High Performance profile. Intel's Core i7-7700K continues to impress with a beastly lead over the other processors, including the -6900K overclocked slightly.
Metro: Last Light Redux
The Ryzen 7 1800X averages 91+ FPS during the benchmark, and only lags the Core i7-7700K by 2.8 FPS.
-
image049
-
image047
-
image053
-
Met - FrameTime - 1920x1080 Very High
-
Met - FrameTimeVariance - 1920x1080 Very High
-
Met - Unevenness - 1920x1080 Very High
-
08
-
07
The FX-8350 falls to the bottom of our chart, and though it trails the rest of the field by a marginal average frame rate, it experiences much more frame time variance.
-
image047
-
Met - FrameTime - 2560x1440 Very High
-
Met - Unevenness - 2560x1440 Very High
-
Met - FrameTimeVariance - 2560x1440 Very High
-
image057
-
image059
-
image049
In all four configurations, the Intel processors are separated by a scant 0.2 FPS during the graphics-intensive workload. The Ryzen 7 1800X offers nearly the same performance as the leading CPUs.
- The Ryzen Debut
- AMD SenseMI Suite & XFR
- The AM4 Platform
- Overclocking & Test Setup
- Cache Testing
- Ashes of the Singularity & Battlefield 4
- Hitman, Project CARS & Metro: Last Light
- Results: Desktop & Office
- Results: Workstation
- Results: Scientific & Engineering Computations And HPC
- Results: Power Consumption And Temperatures
- Conclusion
Their slides showed it beating it in Cinebench, in which it absolutely crushes the 6900k. Ask Intel why they don't have any gaming 8 core chips. This is a productivity chip that is GOOD at gaming and will be BETTER at gaming as more multi-threaded games are released and DirectX12 is implemented. There's no single chip on the market that's best at everything, Ryzen eats the quad core I7s for lunch in rendering, and the faster lower core count i7s beat Ryzen in most gaming. They also beat Broadwell-E in gaming. I think you're missing reality here.
(But I have a 5820K. The best Ryzen in the world would not have had me switch anyway.)
With the good and bad, I think we can all agree the good here is competition. There is some now.
In my opinion AMD failed and they really pulled BS by fooling people into pre ordering but it turns out that in gaming sucks..
Thanks again!
please fix your images on your pages, I cant see anything beside of your wall of texts
Regards,
Lowly Reader
Their slides showed it beating it in Cinebench, in which it absolutely crushes the 6900k. Ask Intel why they don't have any gaming 8 core chips. This is a productivity chip that is GOOD at gaming and will be BETTER at gaming as more multi-threaded games are released and DirectX12 is implemented. There's no single chip on the market that's best at everything, Ryzen eats the quad core I7s for lunch in rendering, and the faster lower core count i7s beat Ryzen in most gaming. They also beat Broadwell-E in gaming. I think you're missing reality here.