Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

Installation And Overclocking the ARES

Asus ARES: Is This The One Graphics Card To Rule Them All?
By

Lifting the Asus ARES out of the case, it becomes apparent that this is one heck of a heavy graphics card. The huge 11"x5" beast weighs a bit more than two reference Radeon HD 5870 cards, and the PCB is a full inch taller. The ARES is even more than one and a half times heavier than the reference Radeon HD 5970. The card is so wide that it monopolizes three expansion slots worth of space, though it's only secured via a two-slot bezel. To help visualize the bulk of the ARES, the following image shows it beside a reference Radeon HD 5870. Keep in mind, the Radeon HD 5870 is no small fry:

Never before have I been concerned about the health of my system due to the weight of a graphics card, but I'll admit that the thought of mounting this four pound behemoth to a motherboard makes me a little nervous.

Regardless, I dropped it in for the sake of testing. As you can see in the following image, Asus beefed up the frame of the card so that the bezel shoulders a lot of the weight and stress. In fact, the company claims its card employs double the structural reinforcement of a reference design.

With the card installed, I turned my attention to the drivers, discovering some interesting news: AMD's reference Catalyst 10.6 drivers may detect the card, but they don't seem to work properly, and even cause a few crashes. This is one of those few cases (Sapphire's Radeon HD 4850 X2 being one of the most memorable) where you'll have to rely on a third-party board vendor for custom drivers. ASUS strongly recommends a fresh windows install for the card, but this isn't necessarily a reasonable solution for people who are happy with their OS the way it is. In this case, ASUS recommends uninstalling the ATI driver normally, rebooting and uninstalling the the driver again via the device manager, and after that removing all remnants of ATI drivers with the Driver Sweeper utility before rebooting and installing the ASUS ARES driver.

Overclocking the ARES

For those in search of more than the ARES' stock performance, Asus supplies its SmartDoctor overclocking utility. Power users will be happy to know that this piece of software allows voltage modification for increased scaling potential.

First, the good news. The voltage tweaking feature of the SmartDoctor utility allows us to reach a stable 1003 MHz core speed and a 1275 MHz GDDR5 memory clock (5100 MHz effective) with the voltage increased to 1.3 V. Getting a Cypress GPU to 1 GHz+ is a difficult task for a single Radeon HD 5870, and even more so with a couple of Radeon HD 5870's in CrossFire. So, this result is extremely impressive and speaks to the engineering effort at Asus, from design to cooling.

Unfortunately, the ARES' fan gets quite loud under load to keep temperatures low, as we see in our benchmarks later on. We also experienced after a crash caused by overclocking the card too far and the SmartDoctor utility attempted to reboot using the failed overclock setting, causing an inescapable crashing loop. We fixed this by removing the SmartDoctor utility in safe mode, and this issue disappeared completely after a fresh Windows install.

Display all 126 comments.
This thread is closed for comments
Top Comments
  • 33 Hide
    Tamz_msc , July 15, 2010 6:07 AM
    I want that briefcase!
  • 21 Hide
    thedreadfather , July 15, 2010 6:22 AM
    This card is so overkill for most of us, but so awesome. :D 
  • 20 Hide
    rohitbaran , July 15, 2010 6:22 AM
    BTW, it would be really cool to see a 5890, for that would give the GTX 480 a run for its money, something it is already not earning! :D 
Other Comments
  • 33 Hide
    Tamz_msc , July 15, 2010 6:07 AM
    I want that briefcase!
  • 14 Hide
    rohitbaran , July 15, 2010 6:21 AM
    On the second page, that should be Radeon 5970, not Radeon 5890. There isn't any card on the market as 5890.
  • 20 Hide
    rohitbaran , July 15, 2010 6:22 AM
    BTW, it would be really cool to see a 5890, for that would give the GTX 480 a run for its money, something it is already not earning! :D 
  • 21 Hide
    thedreadfather , July 15, 2010 6:22 AM
    This card is so overkill for most of us, but so awesome. :D 
  • 11 Hide
    Maziar , July 15, 2010 6:38 AM
    Great review,
    However i agree with Tom's about that there are better options in terms of price/performance ratio.This card looks good and packs lots of power but i wish that it had a lower price.
  • 12 Hide
    anamaniac , July 15, 2010 6:38 AM
    I was excited, but after reading the article, I'm dissapointed.
    Maybe they set the bar too high when they made the MARS, a $1200 GTX285x2.
    I wish the MARS/ARES came with waterblocks though.

    Sounds like the card needs some better drivers.
  • 8 Hide
    rohitbaran , July 15, 2010 6:43 AM
    Well, the card is heavy, power consuming and expensive, but its performance is truly great. BTW, they could have kept the Sapphire Toxic 5970 in the benchmark tests for the sake of immediate comparison. Anyway, this is a great review.
  • 3 Hide
    rohitbaran , July 15, 2010 6:44 AM
    Lets see if Southern Islands top offering can take on this monster.
  • 9 Hide
    JOSHSKORN , July 15, 2010 7:00 AM
    Where's the Radeon HD 5970 Crossfire?
  • 7 Hide
    Anonymous , July 15, 2010 7:02 AM
    With the I7 in the test bed OC'd to just a bit over 3 Ghz I have to wonder how close the CPU is to bottle necking the GPU.
  • 13 Hide
    Lmeow , July 15, 2010 7:15 AM
    Can it play Cr

    What an epic triple slot cooler... Awesome suitcase too.
  • 4 Hide
    desolationjones , July 15, 2010 7:39 AM
    Why do the sli 480 benches for Crysis look completely off? In Crysis at 1920x1080, a single 480 gets the exact same performance of 480s in sli And at 2560x1600, sli 480 gets better performance than at 1920x1080. That doesn't make any sense. Driver issues were mentioned for alien vs preditor, but not for Crysis.
  • 19 Hide
    rohitbaran , July 15, 2010 7:41 AM
    jasonz001it actually looks quite small

    Excuse me, we are talking about graphic cards here, not elephants.
  • 4 Hide
    baracubra , July 15, 2010 7:47 AM
    desolationjonesWhy do the sli 480 benches for Crysis look completely off? In Crysis at 1920x1080, a single 480 gets the exact same performance of 480s in sli And at 2560x1600, sli 480 gets better performance than at 1920x1080. That doesn't make any sense. Driver issues were mentioned for alien vs preditor, but not for Crysis.


    Crysis and SLI don't go well together all the time. When I built my 8800GT SLI rig bck in 07' I got worse performance with SLI enabled than without. After many many drivers and game updates, I finally managed to get 6 extra frames with SLI. FYI, I was running a Q6600 OC to 3.4ghz, and the cards worked fine in other games
  • 15 Hide
    Anonymous , July 15, 2010 7:50 AM
    Can it play Mafia II ? :) 
  • 1 Hide
    festerovic , July 15, 2010 8:01 AM
    waiting for the Kratos edition.
  • 3 Hide
    jsm6746 , July 15, 2010 8:34 AM
    you really have to water cool if you want to up the voltage of a 5870 or 5970... the noise from that 80mm fan running 100% is atrocious...
  • -2 Hide
    superdinmo , July 15, 2010 8:35 AM
    i think it will be April Fool before april
  • 4 Hide
    falchard , July 15, 2010 8:47 AM
    For $1200, I can get 4-HD5870 and stick it into my Quadfire capable board. Man that would look awesome.
Display more comments