Best offers
|
GeForce GTX 295 Video Card (1.75GB,... | $549.99 Dell Home More info |
|
GeForce GTX 260 Video Card (896MB,... | $214.99 Newegg.com More info |
|
GeForce 9800 GTX Video Card (512MB,... | $109.99 Best Buy More info |
|
Radeon HD 5770 Video Card (1GB,... | $179.99 Newegg.com More info |
|
Radeon HD 4890 Cyclone OC Video Card... | $209.99 Directron More info |
Partners
The Games selection
adventure :
Ray
Adventure game, South Park style. Pick the way the story goes by picking an answer among those offered.
|
crazy :
Interactive Boogy
Pick one of the 3 songs, hit on the correct keys matching this boy's dance moves.
|
Sponsored links
Lastly we would like to show you four flash animations (requires Macromedia Flash player) that point out the differences between the cards. Since we used the lowest compression factor available, the loading times may be rather long, depending on your Internet connection.
- Trilinear Filtering - Colored Mipmaps
- Trilinear Filtering - Schwarz/White
- 8x Anisotropic Filtering - Colored Mipmaps
- 8x Anisotropic Filtering - Black/White
Image Quality - Summary
The results of our texture filtering tests look somewhat dramatic. In practice, meaning in normal games, you'd have to keep your eyes peeled to spot the differences between the individual cards and Refrast. From this perspective, adaptive filtering is more or less legitimate, since the user gets much better performance with almost optimal image quality. Nonetheless we would prefer that NVIDIA and ATi left it up to the user to decide whether or not to use these optimizations. Neither company has an advantage when anisotropic filtering is enabled - and both don't render "correctly," at least if you take Refrast as your point of reference. In the last generation of cards, it made sense that adaptive filtering was the only option. But the new X800 and GF6800 should be fast enough to offer optional non-adaptive methods.
Since the Radeon X800 and the MS reference rasterizer show better results in our screenshots, it's hard to understand why the GeForce 6800 offers better image quality, or let's say it renders more correctly - as Microsoft confirms. However, in motion, the 45-degree deflection can cause texture sparkles in a moving image due to the higher Mipmap levels in that area - since they are only used in that area!
But again, the differences in our screenshots are very small, however, and not much has changed since our last article .
Shader Quality - FarCry
The results of the shader quality test remain unchanged from our last test. The image quality of the GeForce 6800 Ultra did not improve with the newer driver. Probably, this won't change until the next game patch. The image quality of the X800 cards is practically identical to that of the Radeon 9800XT - impeccable.
- What would be the ati 4870x2 "equivalent" or closer? [Laptops & Notebooks]
- ATI Radeon HD 4200 vs GeForce 9500 GT [Graphic & Displays]
- ATI RADEON HD 4670 Crashing alot [Graphic & Displays]
- ATI 5850 Compatibility [Graphic & Displays]
- ATI 4890 and 2600XT together? [Graphic & Displays]
Questions? Ask Tom's community!
Sponsored links
Related forums topics
- ATI 4850 still good?
- Q9550 v Q6700
- AMD Deneb Phenom II Reaches 6GHz
- Very bad news for everyones own personal "precious"
- Does my computer suck?
- What would you do? Complicated decision-overclocking which cheap CPU?
- Help Overclocking Q6600 pass 3.0GHz
- Why lower FPS when I OC?
- Extremely low 3DMark Vantage scores
- Problems with E6600 on P5B @ 3.2, noob needs help!!!
- Motherboard + Memory for overclocking Q6600
- 4GB in 32-Bit O/S
- need help, memory test or system test
- new build, P5Q-E issue, random lockups.





