The Graphics Cards Articles
- British Understatement: 3Dlabs' Wildcat VP Put To The Performance Test
- Xabre Rattling - SiS's New Graphics Chip
- The new mainstream Radeon: The 9000 series
- ATi Takes Over 3D Technology Leadership With Radeon 9700
- Attack Out Of The Blind Spot: Matrox Parhelia-512
- VPU Technology Preview: The Wildcat VP Series From 3Dlabs
- At Last: A Hardware Decoder For MPEG-4
- Aaaaand Action! Video Editing with DVStorm SE From Canopus
- Making Themselves Heard: 11 GeForce4 Ti4400 and Ti4600 Cards
- Matrox Parhelia-512 - The Challenger
Forum
- Why is my new build not as fast as I thought it'd be?
- Which Of These CPUs Is The Fastest?
- System Specs - When Asked, What Should I Include?
- Bad power supply?
- Intel demos Penryn at 3.33 ghz at Channel Expo 007
- Worst PC Build Screw Ups
- SLI help
- What do I upgrade? Where is my bottle-neck?
- Fan/Temperature sensor questions
- ATI Radeon 9700 Pro - Any way to make it stable @89MHz?
3DMark 2001 SE
1:08 PM - August 19, 2002 by
Lars Weinand
Source: Tom's Hardware US – Keywords: ati, radeon, 9700, pro
Syndication:
Source: Tom's Hardware US – Keywords: ati, radeon, 9700, pro
Syndication:
Table of Contents:
3DMark 2001 SE

No round of testing would ever be complete without the requisite 3DMark 2001SE run. Despite the controversy surrounding this synthetic benchmark among our readership, we nonetheless consider its final score a very good way of judging a card's 3D performance.



The Radeon's lead is, in a word, impressive; the generation gap between it and the GeForce4 obvious.
- Previous page Jedi Knight II
- Next page 3D Performance In Detail