The Graphics Cards Articles
- British Understatement: 3Dlabs' Wildcat VP Put To The Performance Test
- Xabre Rattling - SiS's New Graphics Chip
- The new mainstream Radeon: The 9000 series
- ATi Takes Over 3D Technology Leadership With Radeon 9700
- Attack Out Of The Blind Spot: Matrox Parhelia-512
- VPU Technology Preview: The Wildcat VP Series From 3Dlabs
- At Last: A Hardware Decoder For MPEG-4
- Aaaaand Action! Video Editing with DVStorm SE From Canopus
- Making Themselves Heard: 11 GeForce4 Ti4400 and Ti4600 Cards
- Matrox Parhelia-512 - The Challenger
Forum
- Why is my new build not as fast as I thought it'd be?
- Which Of These CPUs Is The Fastest?
- System Specs - When Asked, What Should I Include?
- Bad power supply?
- Intel demos Penryn at 3.33 ghz at Channel Expo 007
- Worst PC Build Screw Ups
- SLI help
- What do I upgrade? Where is my bottle-neck?
- Fan/Temperature sensor questions
- ATI Radeon 9700 Pro - Any way to make it stable @89MHz?
FSAA Performance
1:08 PM - August 19, 2002 by
Lars Weinand
Source: Tom's Hardware US – Keywords: ati, radeon, 9700, pro
Syndication:
Source: Tom's Hardware US – Keywords: ati, radeon, 9700, pro
Syndication:
Table of Contents:
FSAA Performance
Following NVIDIA's lead, ATi has now also switched to the faster multisampling edge-smoothing technique. You can find more details on this technology here . Let's take a look at how the two contestants perform under Direct3D and OpenGL with FSAA enabled. To give you a more detailed impression of the overall performance, we will also include the final 3DMark 2001 SE score with FSAA.
3D Mark 2001 SE 330 - FSAA




The Radeon obviously benefits from its superior memory bandwidth. Even with 2X FSAA, it is still faster than the GeForce4 without FSAA! With 2x or 4x FSAA enabled, it offers almost twice the performance of the GeForce4 at corresponding levels.
- Previous page Occlusion Culling
- Next page 3D Mark 2001 SE 330 - FSAA - Dragothic