The Graphics Cards Articles
- British Understatement: 3Dlabs' Wildcat VP Put To The Performance Test
- Xabre Rattling - SiS's New Graphics Chip
- The new mainstream Radeon: The 9000 series
- ATi Takes Over 3D Technology Leadership With Radeon 9700
- Attack Out Of The Blind Spot: Matrox Parhelia-512
- VPU Technology Preview: The Wildcat VP Series From 3Dlabs
- At Last: A Hardware Decoder For MPEG-4
- Aaaaand Action! Video Editing with DVStorm SE From Canopus
- Making Themselves Heard: 11 GeForce4 Ti4400 and Ti4600 Cards
- Matrox Parhelia-512 - The Challenger
Forum
- Why is my new build not as fast as I thought it'd be?
- Which Of These CPUs Is The Fastest?
- System Specs - When Asked, What Should I Include?
- Bad power supply?
- Intel demos Penryn at 3.33 ghz at Channel Expo 007
- Worst PC Build Screw Ups
- SLI help
- What do I upgrade? Where is my bottle-neck?
- Fan/Temperature sensor questions
- ATI Radeon 9700 Pro - Any way to make it stable @89MHz?
3D Mark 2001 SE - FSAA + Aniso - Dragothic High
1:08 PM - August 19, 2002 by
Lars Weinand
Source: Tom's Hardware US – Keywords: ati, radeon, 9700, pro
Syndication:
Source: Tom's Hardware US – Keywords: ati, radeon, 9700, pro
Syndication:
Table of Contents:
3D Mark 2001 SE - FSAA + Aniso - Dragothic High



The performance ratio remains the same in the Dragothic test.
Quake 3 - FSAA + Aniso



In Quake 3, the Radeon 9700 is "only" twice as fast as the GeForce4 Ti.
In this mode of testing, the GeForce4 Ti loses dramatically to the Radeon 9700. It is interesting to note that the performance delta between the cards is much more pronounced in Direct3D than it is in OpenGL. In light of these results, NVIDIA may have to reconsider its anisotropic filtering implementation and its position in regards to honesty. We'll say the same thing here that we said about ATi's implementation, though - in the end, the user should be free to decide whether or not an optimization should be enabled.
- Previous page Maximum Quality - Aniso + FSAA
- Next page CPU Scaling