All about External Storage
 Latest External Storage articles
All External Storage articles

Newsletters


  • Ask your question about IT issues
  • Post

Partners

The Games selection

management : Fishdom Build and develop a kingdom for your fish! Go through the puzzles that have to be solved to earn money, and buy food and decorations to create the...
crazy : Xiao Xiao 7 A great fight scene from the animation movies Xiao Xiao.
Ads

Sponsored links

Test System And Results

Previous Next
7:32 AM - 09/05/2006 by Don Woligroski
System Hardware
Processor(s) 2x Intel Xeon Processor (Nocona core)
3.6 GHz, FSB800, 1 MB L2 Cache
Platform Asus NCL-DS (Socket 604)
Intel E7520 Chipset, BIOS 1005
RAM Corsair CM72DD512AR-400 (DDR2-400 ECC, reg.)
2x 512 MB, CL3-3-3-10 Timings
System Hard Drive Western Digital Caviar WD1200JB
120 GB, 7,200 rpm, 8 MB Cache, UltraATA/100
Mass Storage Controller(s) Intel 82801EB UltraATA/100 Controller (ICH5)
- Promise SATA 300TX4
Driver 1.0.0.33
- Adaptec AIC-7902B Ultra320
Driver 3.0
- Adaptec 48300 8 port PCI-X SAS Controller
Driver 1.1.5472
- Adaptec 4800 8 port PCI-X SAS Controller
Driver 5.1.0.8360
Firmware 5.1.0.8375
- LSI Logic SAS3442X 8 port PCI-X SAS Controller
Driver 1.21.05
BIOS 6.01
Storage Systems Adaptec Storage Enclosure 335SAS
Internal 4-bay hot-swap drive chassis

Adaptec SANbloc S50 JBOD
2U, 12-drive SAS/SATA JBOD

Networking Broadcom BCM5721 On-Board Gigabit Ethernet NIC
Graphics Card On-Board Graphics
ATI RageXL, 8 MB
Benchmarks
Performance-Messungen c't h2benchw 3.6
I/O Performance IOMeter 2003.05.10
Fileserver-Benchmark
Webserver-Benchmark
Database-Benchmark
Workstation-Benchmark
System Software & Drivers
OS Microsoft Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition, Service Pack 1
Platform Driver Intel Chipset Installation Utility 7.0.0.1025
Graphics Driver Default Windows Graphics Driver
Test Results

Our storage benchmark involves moving a lot of big files, but also over 10,000 files smaller than 50 kB. This mix should give us a good idea of the drives' real-world performance.

No big surprises here - performance is pretty close to the advertised native specifications.

The Tandberg 420LTO advertised native transfer rates of 24 MB/s, and it managed to hit 20.8 MB/s in our tests. While that's very close to the claimed figures, we wonder why it's so far from the LTO-2 standard, which should be 40 MB/s. Once again, we can only assume that the reduced performance is part of the trade-off that Tandberg made to get the drive small and power-miserly.

The external 220LTO is based on the older LTO-1 standard, but managed 14.6 MB/s, which is very close to its advertised 16 MB/s specification, and acceptably close to the LTO-1 standard's 20 MB/s specification. Of course, as an LTO-1 drive it also only has half the capacity of the 420LTO.

slide show: Tandberg 420LTO and 220LTO Streamers

Talkback
Comments are closed on this page.

Sponsored links