Great 2560x1600 performance
| 2 x Radeon HD 6870 in CrossFire | |
|---|---|
| Codename: | RV970 "Barts" |
| Process: | 40 nm |
| Universal Shaders: | 2240 (2 x 1120) |
| Texture Units: | 112 (2 x 56) |
| ROPs: | 64 (2 x 32) |
| Memory Bus: | 256-bit |
| Core Speed MHz: | 900 |
| Memory Speed MHz: | 1100 (4200 effective) |
| DirectX/Shader Model: | DX 11/SM 5.0 |
| Max TDP: | 302 W (2 x 151 W) |
Two Radeon HD 6870 cards are a very powerful combination when paired in CrossFire mode, and the same can be said for a couple of GeForce GTX 560 Tis in SLI. Either of these options perform a little better than a single GeForce GTX 580 or Radeon HD 5970. But since the Radeon HD 6870 is notably cheaper right now, this option takes the recommendation.
Read our full review of AMD's Radeon HD 6870 for more information on the card and its accompanying architecture.
Great 2560x1600 performance
| GeForce GTX 580 | |
|---|---|
| Codename: | GF110 |
| Process: | 40 nm |
| Universal Shaders: | 512 |
| Texture Units: | 64 |
| ROPs: | 48 |
| Memory Bus: | 384-bit |
| Core/Shader Speed MHz: | 772 / 1544 |
| Memory Speed MHz: | 1002 (4008 effective) |
| DirectX/Shader Model: | DX 11/SM 5.0 |
| Max TDP: | 244 W |
The fastest graphics card with a single GPU, Nvidia's GeForce GTX 580 can challenge the dual-GPU Radeon HD 5970. The GeForce GTX 580 wins its share of battles against the previously undisputed king-of-the-hill. And while it's outperformed by dual-card solutions like Radeon HD 6870s in CrossFire and GeForce GTX 560s in SLI, it scores a well-deserved place on the honorable mention list.
Read our full review of Nvidia's GeForce GTX 580 for more information on the card and its underlying architecture.
Excellent 2560x1600 performance
| 2 x Radeon HD 6950 1 GB in CrossFire | |
|---|---|
| Codename: | "Cayman" |
| Process: | 40 nm |
| Universal Shaders: | 2816 (2 x 1408) |
| Texture Units: | 176 (2 x 88) |
| ROPs: | 64 (2 x 32) |
| Memory Bus: | 256-bit |
| Core Speed MHz: | 800 |
| Memory Speed MHz: | 1250 (5000 effective) |
| DirectX/Shader Model: | DX 11/SM 5.0 |
| Max TDP: | 400 W (2 x 200 W) |
Recent tests performed by our very own Thomas Soderstrom confirm that the Radeon HD 6900-series has vastly improved scaling performance in CrossFire compared to previous-generation boards. As such, a pair of these cards represents a realistic pinnacle for our recommendations. At $540, two Radeon HD 6950s will handily beat the GeForce GTX 580, and even come very close to catching the pricier Radeon HD 6990 and GeForce GTX 590.
Read our full review of AMD's Radeon HD 6950 for more information on the card and its accompanying architecture.
Excellent 2560x1600 performance
| Radeon HD 6990 | |
|---|---|
| Codename: | "Cayman" |
| Process: | 40 nm |
| Universal Shaders: | 3072 (2 x 1536) |
| Texture Units: | 192 (2 x 96) |
| ROPs: | 64 (2 x 32) |
| Memory Bus: | 256-bit |
| Core Speed MHz: | 830 |
| Memory Speed MHz: | 1250 (5000 effective) |
| DirectX/Shader Model: | DX 11/SM 5.0 |
| Max TDP: | 375 W |
The Radeon HD 6990 was the undisputed fastest graphics card in the world for a few weeks, until the emergence of Nvidia's GeForce GTX 590. And it's not even like the Nvidia card stripped it of its title. These titans are forced to grudgingly share the title, as their performance is often too close to call a winner.
At about $700, neither of these options is cost effective, especially with a Radeon HD 6950 CrossFire setup nipping at their heels for far less dough. The Radeon HD 6990 might be overly loud, and the GeForce GTX 590 is very hard to actually find for sale right now, but both deserve an honorable mention for their prestigious position and indisputably high performance.
Read our full review of AMD's Radeon HD 6990 for more information on the card and its accompanying architecture.
Great 2560x1600 performance
| GeForce GTX 590 | |
|---|---|
| Codename: | GF110 |
| Process: | 40 nm |
| Universal Shaders: | 1024 (2 x 512) |
| Texture Units: | 128 (2 x 64) |
| ROPs: | 96 (2 x 48) |
| Memory Bus: | 384-bit |
| Core/Shader Speed MHz: | 607 / 1215 |
| Memory Speed MHz: | 853 (3412 effective) |
| DirectX/Shader Model: | DX 11/SM 5.0 |
| Max TDP: | 365 W |
Read our full review of Nvidia's GeForce GTX 590 for more information on the card and its underlying architecture.
The HD6970s are still a great buy in my books... I'm glad i got me a pair...
It's not nearly the most exciting, but I always find the low end graphics updates the most interesting. I've never had to have the latest and greatest cards but it's interesting to see how much performance one can get for so cheap these days, and it's constantly improving with trickle-down.
only 4 nvidia cards?
so AMD cards are still better value despite people crying about drivers and stuttering and such. Just wondering if you guys at Toms have had any driver or stuttering issues?
Just a thought, but maybe you could add a plot graph of performance vs. price with various cards in it. I think a visual presentation would give a better understanding when comparing cards and special deals.
so AMD cards are still better value despite people crying about drivers and stuttering and such. Just wondering if you guys at Toms have had any driver or stuttering issues?
Well, I've also seen people crying with blue screen issues on nVidia's side. I own numerous nVidia and AMD cards whichever had the better value at point of purchase and I can say, these people who cry and whine represent only a small percentage of the market.
Look, I'm not being bias on either side, but to say that the drivers from either company is perfect is absurd (again, not saying that you said so). Each company has its fair share of driver issues so don't let purchase be affected by drivers. More times than not, monitor calibration, games development and color profiles could be the root of issues.
what if a gtx460 768mb and hd5770 1024mb cost the same? which is better?
best card for $420, article released on 4/20.. hmmm
^obviously gtx460 768mb...
@unklg
n that occasion no doubt gtx460 768mb would be the choice...
What's with the rating system? Is 'excellent' better than 'great'?
Wow, my HD5770 is till there?
lol. where did all GTX460 go?
I'm still looking at a pair of those 6970's. So tempting.
I wish the graphic chips of arm powered devices could once be tested too!
A lot of gear out there that has unknown GPU's, some of which are reasonably good for the job they perform.
I'm still looking at a pair of those 6970's. So tempting.
It was always a tie with the 6850, but all th 460s are $190 now while the 6850 is $165. Not worth a $25 price increase for te same performance
What about the 6570? With it's overclocking potential, it is a no brainer over the 5670 for those who overclock.
Not really. The 1GB version can still unlock the shaders. Then overclock to 6970 speeds and you achieve the same result.
I believe it should be mentioned what is the setup and the details set for these benchmarks; i.e I currently own Q6600@3.2Ghz + 4GB 800Mhz DDR2 + GTX580 + 120GB Vertex 2 SSD; I can tell you that on 1920-1080 res it can not cope with 8xMSAA and ambient occlusion on high or other such details at max; So to me Excellent or Great means that you can play at a certain resolution with everything on MAX (including aliasing, transparency, ambient light, etc)