Page 1:Blu-ray 3D Arrives On The PC
Page 2:A Quick 3D Primer
Page 3:The Blu-ray 3D Format
Page 4:Many Display Types, But Only One High-Resolution Choice
Page 5:The Other Displays: Half-Resolution Or None At All
Page 6:Blu-ray 3D Playback Software
Page 7:Requirements For A Full-Resolution Blu-ray 3D PC
Page 8:The 3D Blu-ray User Experience: Installation And Use
Page 9:Test Systems And Benchmarks
Page 10:Benchmark Results: CPU Utilization
Page 11:Subjective Tests: Does Blu-ray 3D Live Up To The Hype?
Page 12:Subjective Tests, Continued
Page 13:Conclusion: Blu-ray 3D Looks Promising On The PC
Test Systems And Benchmarks
We were sent two very different test platforms for our exploration of Blu-ray 3D: a laptop and a home-theater PC. Let's start with the laptop:
The laptop appears to be a variant of Asus' G51J-3D. It employs an Intel Core i7-720QM processor and 8GB of RAM, and sports a GeForce GTS 360M with 1GB of dedicated GDDR5 memory for graphics. The 15.6" display isn't full 1080p HD, but instead features a 1366x768 native resolution, which is a little better than 720p. Regardless, it provides a great picture and fantastic 3D effects for a portable PC. Rumor has it that the final model will feature Blu-ray 3D compatibility from the factory, in addition to an integrated 3D Vision IR emitter.
The home-theater PC is a custom-built Maingear system intended for demonstrating Blu-ray 3D and 3D Vision. The platform is decidedly entry-level, as far as processing and graphics muscle are concerned. Maingear goes the quiet, energy-efficient route with a dual-core Pentium G6950 and GeForce GT 240 GPU. Of course, the GT 240 is the least-expensive and least-powerful graphics card on Nvidia's list of desktop GPUs that support Blu-ray 3D playback. Because we're interested in this GPU's fixed-function video decode logic, however, it's on equal footing with the higher-end GeForce GTX 480 and 470 graphics cards.
The display is an Acer GD235HZ, a 3D Vision-ready 23.6" LCD monitor with a native 1920x1080 resolution and an HDCP-compliant DVI input. This monitor can be found for about $380 online.
The Blu-ray 3D disc we use for testing is one of the only discs available for the budding new format: Monsters vs Aliens 3D. It is not a bad flick, with lots of laughs for the adults as well as the kids. Seth Rogen rocks.
For our objective testing, we ran Blu-ray 3D on our own test systems:
|Athlon II Test System||Core i7 Test System|
AMD Athlon II X3 440 (Deneb)
Intel Core i7-920 (Nehalem)
ASRock X58 SuperComputer
|Networking||Onboard Gigabit LAN controller|
Onboard Gigabit LAN controller
Zotac GeForce GT 240
Asus GeForce ENGTX260 Matrix
*all clock rates have been set to reference specifications for the purpose of benchmarking
Western Digital Caviar WD50 00AAJS-00YFA
Thermaltake Toughpower 1,200W
|Software and Drivers|
|Operating System||Microsoft Windows 7 64-bit|
|DirectX version||DirectX 10|
|Graphics Drivers||Nvidia GeForce 257.01|
- Blu-ray 3D Arrives On The PC
- A Quick 3D Primer
- The Blu-ray 3D Format
- Many Display Types, But Only One High-Resolution Choice
- The Other Displays: Half-Resolution Or None At All
- Blu-ray 3D Playback Software
- Requirements For A Full-Resolution Blu-ray 3D PC
- The 3D Blu-ray User Experience: Installation And Use
- Test Systems And Benchmarks
- Benchmark Results: CPU Utilization
- Subjective Tests: Does Blu-ray 3D Live Up To The Hype?
- Subjective Tests, Continued
- Conclusion: Blu-ray 3D Looks Promising On The PC