Performance Summary, Efficiency, And Conclusion
We’ll summarize performance and efficiency using December’s stock $500 PC as a base.
Performance Summary
On average, the overall performance of the stock March PC equals the significantly-overclocked December PC. This month’s fairly tame overclock still manages to deliver sizeable performance gains.

Efficiency
More impressive than performance alone is the March PC’s low power consumption, and resulting efficiency gains!

Conclusion
AMD’s triple-core Athlon II holds the crown among sub-$80 gaming processors. In fact, all four SBM budget gaming machines built in 2010 featured an Athlon II X3-based processor. Half of them rewarded us with four fully-stable cores, while the other two failed to unlock and came up a bit short in our threaded encoding and productivity benchmarks. But there is more and more evidence, such as today’s F1 2010 data, in support of splurging on four cores right out of the gate, even on a pure gaming rig.
This March 2011 gaming PC offers impressive performance and efficiency, but the question still remains: was it worth breaking the bank for a Phenom II, in essence spending an extra $25 for 6 MB of L3 cache, while giving up 200 MHz of frequency? Unfortunately, there is no definitive answer. There are too many variables in play here, such as changes in graphics cards and the benchmark suite itself. Even future gaming comparisons may be hampered due to poor overclocking headroom from this month's Sapphire Radeon HD 6850. We do know the Phenom II’s gobs of L3 cache can make a difference in some applications and games.
While I believe exploring AMD’s Phenom II X4 925 was the right call, pricing determines whether we’d recommend it or use one again. For the recent $10-$20 difference, the retail boxed Phenom II X4 955 Black Edition is clearly a better package. If this is too steep, $100 buys an Athlon II X4 640. These offer more value, while leaving around $20 for aftermarket cooling, should lower temperatures, quieter operation, or higher-voltage overclocks be what your heart desires.
Intel’s Sandy Bridge-based platform is all the rage now, and for good reason considering what it brings to the table. While a Core i5 is beyond our tight budget, I’ll certainly entertain the possibility of Intel’s newly-available Core i3-2100 for the next SBM. But the attractiveness of what AMD continues to offer the budget-minded gamer is undeniable. Take our $100 motherboard and RAM combo. From there, regardless of whether you choose the affordable Athlon II X4 640, the enthusiast’s Phenom II X4 955 Black Edition, or something in between, you have the makings of a very value-oriented gaming platform.
- 1 / 5
- Next
-
Latest Buyers Guides News
- 05/28 – Deals May 28: Logitech Wireless Gaming Mouse $74.99
- 05/25 – Deals May 25: 50'' LG 1080p Plasma HDTV $649.99 FS
- 05/24 – Deals May 24: Two 24'' Dell UltraSharp LCDs + Stand...
- 05/23 – Deals May 23: Pre-order Halo 4 with Free $25 Store Credit
- 05/22 – Deals May 22: Core i7 Desktop + 27'' UltraSharp LCD...
Latest Buyers Guides reviews
- 03/30 – System Builder Marathon Bonus: Newegg Customer Choice PC
- 03/29 – System Builder Marathon, March 2012: System Value Compared
- 03/28 – System Builder Marathon, March 2012: $2600 Performance PC
- 03/27 – System Builder Marathon, March 2012: $1250 Enthusiast PC
- 03/26 – System Builder Marathon, March 2012: $650 Gaming PC
-
Latest Xigmatek reviews
- Five Gaming Cases Between $80 And $120, Reviewed
- In Pictures: Five Mainstream Gaming Cases, Previewed
- Big Air: 14 LGA 2011-Compatible Coolers For Core i7-3000,...
- In Pictures: 14 LGA 2011 Coolers For Your Core i7-3000 CPU
- Power Supply Reference: Consumption, Savings, And More
-
Latest Sapphire News
- Sapphire Unveils Edge-HD3 Mini PC
- Sapphire Adds Fusion and Xtend TV
- Sapphire Does 3D Gaming with Eyefinity
-
Latest Sapphire reviews
- Five Radeon HD 7970 3 GB Cards, Overclocked And Benchmarked
- System Builder Marathon, Dec. 2011: System Value Compared
- System Builder Marathon, Dec. 2011: $600 Gaming PC
- The Radeon HD 6950 Sweet Spot: Five 1 GB Cards Rounded-Up
- System Builder Marathon, Sept. 2011: System Value Compared

i think orange looks spiffy
worst case in the world.
"I’ll certainly entertain the possibility of Intel’s newly-available Core i3-2100 for the next SBM."
Have fun overclocking that rig!
I'd choose my O/C'd i3-530 @ 3.75 GHz (stock, air-cooled) over any of the new Sandy Bridge offerings any day.
The 2100 just cannot compete with that- it's marginally better than a first-gen i3, and it cannot be pushed harder.
*Hopes Bulldozer will be ready by that time*
Pretty darn good for $500!
Good Build!
Need the optical drive?
now finaly a low SBM build I like.
++ on the PSU (finaly not a 500W+ waste)
+ on the case (looks decent)
Pretty good build for the $. I would've gone with the Athlon x4 or x3 to keep things under budget, but that is just me. There are plenty of GPU options in the ~$170 price range. I think you might've got one of "those" GPU's that you read about. This is why "expecting" OC'ing abilities with whatever part you buy, shouldn't be taken for granted. Buy what you can afford and if you get a good OC on your parts, feel blessed
I would've taken the savings on the CPU and bought better RAM or maybe even a different case, but that is just nit picking a bit
Would someone please explain the point of comparing the old SBM to the new one if there isn't a list of the parts from the SBM done in the past? These have always been annoying when the reader is forced to look back to December for a detailed list of parts. This has been practiced for years here. It makes no sense comparing to something the reader has no idea as to the parts being used in the past. Seriously....
Edit: Why Did I get a Minus one the second after my post was submitted?
Very nice build for the price. However, I simply can't help but think for another hundred or so dollars a Sandy Bridge build would be worth saving up another couple of months for by the person who had a very tight budget. It's what I'd recommend to a friend, unless he/she had an immediate need that couldn't wait.

Would someone please explain the point of comparing the old SBM to the new one if there isn't a list of the parts from the SBM done in the past? These have always been annoying when the reader is forced to look back to December for a detailed list of parts. This has been practiced for years here. It makes no sense comparing to something the reader has no idea as to the parts being used in the past. Seriously....Edit: Why Did I get a Minus one the second after my post was submitted?
There is a list, but it requires reading the story through page eight, at least =)
Nice system! I don't know if a SB cpu will be much better. Bear in mind that the SB would have to be the i3 due to price. And as a Dual-Core with no ability to overclock what-so-ever, it may have a heck of a time going up against a true quad-core. On this config, I would have dropped down from the X4 925 to the X4 640. Then used the saved $25 towards a 6870 ( http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] la-search) Cheapest at Newegg is $190 (not to mention a $20 rebate, that brings it down to $170).
Actually there is a new review .. sort of ... for the 2100 in which it shows some pretty interesting numbers, and it's available here:
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?p [...] 2100&num=1
Numbers aside, looking forward to the next SBM.
Would someone please explain the point of comparing the old SBM to the new one if there isn't a list of the parts from the SBM done in the past? These have always been annoying when the reader is forced to look back to December for a detailed list of parts. This has been practiced for years here. It makes no sense comparing to something the reader has no idea as to the parts being used in the past. Seriously....Edit: Why Did I get a Minus one the second after my post was submitted?
I hope Tomshardware editors never stoop to writing reviews geared to people that won't make the effort to look up past articles.
yeah because who would want to live in a world that's convenient......
delete please!
There is a list, but it requires reading the story through page eight, at least =)
Sorry, can't read with my foot in my mouth.
Nice system! I don't know if a SB cpu will be much better. Bear in mind that the SB would have to be the i3 due to price. And as a Dual-Core with no ability to overclock what-so-ever, it may have a heck of a time going up against a true quad-core. On this config, I would have dropped down from the X4 925 to the X4 640. Then used the saved $25 towards a 6870 ( http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] la-search) Cheapest at Newegg is $190 (not to mention a $20 rebate, that brings it down to $170).
I was thinking it would be more in my first post, but a quad-core SB can be had for $60 more, a mainboard can be had for $5 more, so now that I've actually looked it up, you can get into an i5 Sandy Bridge with a decent Asrock mainboard for a total of another $65. Overclocking on the stock cooler? My guess is results would be similar.
That would be a 13% increase in price, and I'd be willing to bet the overall performance difference would be more than that.
The better you know your software needs, the better you can tailor your system. I think a lot of gamers would shift as you would for the better graphics card, but that would actually hurt some games that need the stronger CPU. World of Warcraft is an example - while Cataclysm brought changes that make the video card much more important, the CPU is still a major player and when player populations get high the most critical element. It's something I think FPS multiplayer gamers might think about as well.
I have lots of respect for the editors at Toms, don't get me wrong. I'm sure many other readers would also prefer a list of the previous SMB, as well. Searching through an article for components to compare the two is very inconvenient.Please take this into consideration on the next SBM.-Thanks!
Thanks one-shot, but I'm not sure how else I can help you here. The complete list of comparison hardware is right there on the page called Test System Configuration And Benchmarks. You have this quarter's hardware and last quarter's hardware in successive tables. I'm not sure how much more convenient we can make it. If you have any suggestions, please suggest away!
Best,
Chris