The Motherboards Articles
- Computex: Nvidia declares war on Intel
- A Real Nail-Biter: Four Boards With ALi Magik 1
- Crème De La Crème: Special Edition 815 Boards and Useful Add-Ons
- DDR for Pentium III: 10 Boards with VIA Apollo Pro 266
- VIA Apollo KT266 Revisited - Much Ado About Nothing
- VIA's DDR-Runner For Athlon - The Apollo KT266 Chipset
- Tabula Rasa: Six Boards for the Pentium 4
- Athlon Boosters - Three AMD 760 Boards for DDR SDRAM
- Reinforcements: 6 New Athlon Boards With VIA's KT133A
- Turbo Drive: Two Dual Boards with 2000 MHz
News
Reviews
Forum
- Core i7 overclock feature changed
- Intel's playing catch-up
- Phenom 9850 v Q6600 For Fun System
- Hector Ruiz Steps Down \ TheStreet: AMD's Massive Losses Motor Along
- Anand does Nehalem!!!
- Dual AMD X16 AMD64 Mofo such a beast ???
- Best P35 based board? (with oc in mind)
- New Motherboard
- MicroATX (C2D) overclocking boards?
- Best Motherboard
Windows 2000 Results - SiSoft Sandra 2001 Pro SE
Table of Contents:
Windows 2000 Results - SiSoft Sandra 2001 Pro SE
I am including those numbers for geeks only, because they don't have much of a real world meaning. Still it's good to check them out. Again, the single Xeon 4 would not run Sandra reliably.

Well, from the Flops and the Mips point of view, dual Xeon 4 1.7 GHz is the big winner.

The multimedia performance of the three dual processor systems is pretty much identical, making this test disappointingly useless for this comparison.

It is interesting to see the increase in memory bandwidth of the dual-processor Athlon(MP) systems. As usual, the RDRAM platforms of Pentium 4 and Xeon 4 are scoring the highest numbers in this test.
- Previous page Windows 2000 Results - 3DMark2001
- Next page Windows 2000 Results - Dual Processor...

