Best offers
|
Core i7 I7-920 Quad Core Processor... | $349.99 Dell Home More info |
|
Phenom II X4 965 Black Edition Quad... | $194.99 Newegg.com More info |
|
Core i5 750 Qaud Core Processor... | $199.99 Newegg.com More info |
|
Core i7 Extreme Edition I7-975 Quad... | $1041.17 CostCentral.com More info |
|
Phenom II X4 955 Black Edition Quad... | $182.99 Directron More info |
Popular Searches
- upcoming amd processors
- turion 64 x2 tl 56
- upcoming amd cpu
- turion tl56
- laptop cpu charts
- amd® turion™ 64 x2 tl60 dual core processor 2.0 ghz vs intel
- tl56
- cpu turion 64 x2
- top cpu for notebook
- turion 64 x2 tl 60
- turion 64 x2 speed
- processor family model
- turion™ 64 x2 mobile dual core tl60
- turion tl60
- turion 64 x2 mobile 1.8ghz review
Partners
The Games selection
adventure :
Scoobydoo: Episode 2
The sequel of Scooby and Sammy's adventures. Same principle as in the previous episode (available on this website). Click on "Instructions" to see...
|
crazy :
Xiao Xiao 7
A great fight scene from the animation movies Xiao Xiao.
|
Ads
Sponsored links
3:20 AM - 05/22/2008 by
Patrick Schmid and Achim Roos
- Email |
- Print |
- Comments (9) |
- Share
The Turion 64 X2 TL-56 is an entry-level model, running at a 1.8-GHz clock speed. Unfortunately, this model only has a 300-MHz memory clock speed due to a poor core clock speed per possible memory divider ratio. You will find more details on one of the following pages (see “Memory Speeds Vary”).
Turion 64 X2 TL-60
The Turion 64 X2 TL-60 is the only processor in this family, which can actually run the full DDR2-667 memory speed, because a 2000-MHz core clock speed divided by six results in a 333-MHz clock speed required to reach DDR2-667.
Turion 64 X2 TL-62
Turion 64 X2 TL-64
Turion 64 X2 TL-66
Turion 64 X2 TL-68
This is the 2.4 GHz top model of the Turion 64 X2 family.
Topics being discussed on the forums
Sponsored links
Related forums topics
- What computers did you own in the old days? Share your story!
- Core 2 duo vs Quad Core Help Please
- When is 4mb L2 necessary over 2mb of L2 cache?
- Whats the fastest socket 479 CPU for my HP nc8000 notebook laptop
- Dual Core Notebook CPUs Explored
- Sony Vaio SZ - overclock the GPU - How to?
- Dell Notebook Overclocking...
- cool n quiet?
- new AMD X2 3800+ Koolance rig is up and running!
- overclocking laptop cpu or graphics card
- HP says 2gig max
- The Graphics State of the Union
- need suggestions for testbed setup for notebook components
- Clevo 4xx series compatible motherboard
So if this is an updated mobile cpu chart, where are the T8100's T9300's?
45nm is the way to go on laptops
I also miss some processor in the T5000 series, because they are very common in low-end laptops. Good work anyway!
I too am very dissapointed that your mobile CPU chart doesn't inlcude the T5000 series of processors from Intel. I realize that everyone wants to see the "high end", but some of want to compare it to the low end as well.
I just purchased an HP 17" laptop and was trying to find some data on the T5000 processors because that is what comes stock on the model I purchased. I wanted to see if it was really worth it to spend the extra ~$200 to upgrade to the T9000 processors. I had to look elsewhere to get that kind of comparrison.
To bad for Toms' sites, I found another reputable site that I will now use as a reference tool. Shame on Tom's for not covering the mid and low range products.
65nm Turion X2's support DDR2-800. Why wasn't this speed used instead of DDR2-667?
toms you are no1 but you need more laptop cpu and gpu charting.
Wow, I knew my TL-60 was pathetic but I never realized just how much
I like the charts, I like the interactivity and I love that we can compare mobile and desktop CPUs. I just wish mine didn't rank so low.
Copying an earlier comment, these charts need many more chips on them. I just bought an otherwise screaming laptop with an 8800M GTS GPU but only T5550 CPU, and want to know how much improvement I'd get moving up to a T8xxx or T9xxx.
Plus in general I miss how the charts used to allow highlighting of specific processors for easier comparison.
Tom's used to be number 1. They are jut OK now. If you don't know more than the authors and are not able to independently screen the information you can't trust the data or conclusions at Tom's anymore
Copying an earlier comment, these charts need many more chips on them. I just bought an otherwise screaming laptop with an 8800M GTS GPU but only T5550 CPU, and want to know how much improvement I'd get moving up to a T8xxx or T9xxx.Plus in general I miss how the charts used to allow highlighting of specific processors for easier comparison.
That's a bit pointless why review lots when the few they have are done poorly anyway.
Whats the point of adding these benchmarks without demonstrating that your Notebook battery will last - less, more or the same between models/price/performance.
Tom's grab a load meter and find the DC power load of each of these processors on your Solar Power equipment (direct DC input not AC PSU, to emulated a Notebook Battery).
1. record peak and typical power in "each & every" application/benchmark
2. record power consumption at system IDLE