Shop for All
|
WinTV-HVR 1600 TV Tuner |
Compare the top 5 lowest prices by hovering your mouse over the product names on the left |
$79.99 |
|
PCTV HD PRO STICK-USB2 HD TVTUN | $99.99 | |
|
Radeon HD 4850 Video Card | $199.99 | |
|
GeForce 9800 GX2 Video Card | $424.99 | |
|
Radeon HD 4870 X2 Video Card | $539.99 |
The Graphics Cards Articles
- NVIDIA Announces RIVA 128ZX
- 3D Winbench 98 - Only a Misleading Benchmark or the Best Target for...
- The Influence of CPU on Voodoo 2 Performance
- Overcloking the Voodoo2 - Is it Worth It ?
- Diamond's Monster 3D II
- Diamond Monster 3D II - More Than a Worthy Successor
- 3D Accelerator Review Step One - 3D Performance, the Real Deal
- The REAL Thing - GLQuake and Quake II (GL) Performance of 3D...
- 3D Accelerator Card Reviews
- Review AGP Graphic Cards
Reviews
QUAKE II
12:00 PM - February 27, 1998 by
Thomas Pabst
Source: Tom's Hardware US – Keywords: creative, labs, 3d, blaster, voodoo2
Syndication:
Source: Tom's Hardware US – Keywords: creative, labs, 3d, blaster, voodoo2
Syndication:
Table of Contents:
QUAKE II
I don't think I've got much to say about Quake II. Quake II wants FPU, that's why K6 and particularly 6x86MX CPUs have a significant disadvantage in playability.
The picture is again as we know it. The two Voodoo² boards are scoring higher than anything else and there's as good as no difference between the 12 and the 8 MB version.
800x600 makes the lead of the Voodoo² boards even more obvious, again no visible reason to favorize the 12 MB 3D Blaster Voodoo² over the Monster 3D II.
- Previous page TUROK
- Next page Conclusion
