Page 1:Can A Liquid-Cooled Radeon R9 290 Be Affordable?
Page 2:CryoVenom R9 290: Meet The Card
Page 3:Test Hardware And Benchmark Settings
Page 5:Results: 3DMark
Page 6:Results: Tomb Raider And F1 2012
Page 7:Results: Arma 3
Page 8:Results: Battlefield 4
Page 9:Results: Far Cry 3
Page 10:Results: Metro: Last Light
Page 11:Power, Heat, And Efficiency
Page 12:Making A Value Case For Water-Cooling A GPU
Results: Tomb Raider And F1 2012
Remembering that my lab's low ambient temperatures give the air-cooled card a best-case environment, VisionTek's CryoVenom R9 290 continues to lead at the same clock rates.
With both cards overclocked, the water-cooled CryoVenom even manages to trump the retail Sapphire board's optimized fan settings.
I might have expected water cooling to give VisionTek's offering an advantage using Tomb Raider's Ultimate quality preset, but the lead instead remains constant.
F1 2012's High quality setting presents too light of a load for the fastest graphics cards.
The more strenuous workload of a multi-monitor configuration starts weighing on both cards once we dial in this title's Ultra detail preset. They boast the same GPU, and the most effective cooling solution (water) wins.
- Can A Liquid-Cooled Radeon R9 290 Be Affordable?
- CryoVenom R9 290: Meet The Card
- Test Hardware And Benchmark Settings
- Results: 3DMark
- Results: Tomb Raider And F1 2012
- Results: Arma 3
- Results: Battlefield 4
- Results: Far Cry 3
- Results: Metro: Last Light
- Power, Heat, And Efficiency
- Making A Value Case For Water-Cooling A GPU