The CPU Articles
- Getting Up to Speed: XP-TMC Adapter Socket from Upgradeware Unlocks...
- Bidding Adieu: P4 3.2 vs. Athlon XP 3200+
- Intel Rigs Up: P4 Series with FSB800
- High-Flying: AMD Athlon XP 3200+ Squares Off Against Intel P4 3 GHz
- Duel of the Titans: Opteron vs. Xeon
- VapoChill Puts a Pentium 4 with 800 MHz FSB within Reach
- Benchmark Marathon: 65 CPUs from 100 MHz to 3066 MHz
- Barton's Here: Athlon XP 3000+ vs. P4 3.06 GHz
- The Resurrection: Pentium III 1.4 GHz on Slot-1 Motherboards
- HyperThreading Threads Its Way into Application
Forum
- How many PC's do you have?
- Just got The Phenom 9850Be today!!!
- Huge Workstation Build
- [help] choosing a CPU for my new gaming desktop
- CPU charts - floating point number crunching
- Asus PC-DL to Fastest Asus MB Help?
- Super C/P ratio DDR2 motherboard, DFI LANParty DK X38-T2R introduction
- Are there any quad core q6600 motherboards? only find dual quad xeon!
- A semi-prof vid editing PC that can edit uncompressed HD
- motherboard with two 775 sockets ?
3D Studio Max 5.1
1:02 PM - August 11, 2003 by
Frank Völkel
Source: Tom's Hardware US – Keywords: dual, xeon, duo
Syndication:
Source: Tom's Hardware US – Keywords: dual, xeon, duo
Syndication:
Table of Contents:
3D Studio Max 5.1
The most frequently used 3D rendering program yields disappointing results: The dual Xeon 3.06 with 1 MB L3 cache does not produce any advantage. Compared to the "single" Pentium 4 with 3.2 GHz, the two dual Xeons are in the lead with an increase that is just shy of 70 percent.

Cinema 4D XL 8.1
The renowned Cinema 4D XL benchmark, in which a 3D image is rendered in 1280 x 1024 x 24 resolution, delivers similar results. In this case again, all four virtual mobile processors are used at the same time. Compared to the 3.2 GHz P4, a speed advantage of 80 percent is the result. However, the additional L3 cache again shows no effect.

- Previous page Test Configuration And Special Features
- Next page SPECviewperf 7.1