The CPU Articles
- Getting Up to Speed: XP-TMC Adapter Socket from Upgradeware Unlocks...
- Bidding Adieu: P4 3.2 vs. Athlon XP 3200+
- Intel Rigs Up: P4 Series with FSB800
- High-Flying: AMD Athlon XP 3200+ Squares Off Against Intel P4 3 GHz
- Duel of the Titans: Opteron vs. Xeon
- VapoChill Puts a Pentium 4 with 800 MHz FSB within Reach
- Benchmark Marathon: 65 CPUs from 100 MHz to 3066 MHz
- Barton's Here: Athlon XP 3000+ vs. P4 3.06 GHz
- The Resurrection: Pentium III 1.4 GHz on Slot-1 Motherboards
- HyperThreading Threads Its Way into Application
Forum
- How many PC's do you have?
- Just got The Phenom 9850Be today!!!
- Huge Workstation Build
- [help] choosing a CPU for my new gaming desktop
- CPU charts - floating point number crunching
- Asus PC-DL to Fastest Asus MB Help?
- Super C/P ratio DDR2 motherboard, DFI LANParty DK X38-T2R introduction
- Are there any quad core q6600 motherboards? only find dual quad xeon!
- A semi-prof vid editing PC that can edit uncompressed HD
- motherboard with two 775 sockets ?
MainConcept 1.3
1:02 PM - August 11, 2003 by
Frank Völkel
Source: Tom's Hardware US – Keywords: dual, xeon, duo
Syndication:
Source: Tom's Hardware US – Keywords: dual, xeon, duo
Syndication:
Table of Contents:
MainConcept 1.3
In MPEG-2 encoding of DV video, both dual systems manage a boost in performance of 18.8 percent over the fastest P4 - and that's not exactly brilliant performance. The two Xeon systems differ by 1.7 percent - once again, the 1 MB L3 cache is barely noticeable. Based on the fastest dual Xeon system, a data quantity of 7.5 MB/s is processed.

Pinnacle Studio 8.5
It's a different story with the Pinnacle benchmark: Without the L3 cache, the dual Xeon system is slower than the P4 with 3.2 GHz. On the other hand, the dual Xeon with the L3 cache benefits from improved memory performance and gains 18.1 percent.

- Previous page SPECviewperf 7.1
- Next page PC Mark 2002