Asus E35M1-I Deluxe
While ASRock uses reduced cost to increase value, Asus takes the opposite approach by focusing instead on features. An 802.11n Wi-Fi adapter fills a half-length mini PCIe slot, while two USB 3.0 controllers address both rear-panel and front-panel connectivity.
Asus even takes better-advantage of the A50M’s USB 2.0 ports by integrating a Bluetooth adapter—perfect for transferring media to portable devices—and Asus even exploits all of the chipset’s SATA 6Gb/s ports by adding eSATA to five internal connections.
Only three of the six traditional analog audio connections are found on the rear panel, though jack-repurposing and front-panel connections should address the needs of most owners. Similarly, Asus ditches the VGA connector, instead supporting DVI-to-VGA adapter blocks through a DVI-I connection.
An extremely large and relatively heavy passive sink cools both the APU and chipset. Despite its promising size, the cooler isn't able to accommodate a fan. That's only worrying because the E35M1-I Deluxe is designed for overclocking, so we have to suspect potential will be limited by cooling in this case.
Overclocking usually requires additional power, so the E35M1-I Deluxe is one of the few boards in today’s roundup to use a 4-pin CPU power connector.
Unique to Asus is the MemOK button. Located between the memory slots and heat sink, pressing it forces lower memory speed and/or timings to help make poorly-programmed (usually overclock-rated) memory bootable.
Asus adds two Wi-Fi antennas to the E35M1-I Deluxe’s installation kit, but does not include a VGA adapter for its DVI-I connector, which is frankly fine with us. Though that type of monitor is typically below this product’s target market, we tested the connector with a “generic” adapter and confirmed that it does work.
E35M1-I Deluxe Tuning
We appreciate that Asus doesn’t cheat on its default APU clock, instead offering buyers the option of manually overclocking. The DDR3-1333 setting also works, but wasn’t automatically configured for our memory, in spite of its compatible SPD programming.
The APU reference clock is adjustable from 90 to 300 MHz, far beyond the capabilities of AMD’s E-350, even at relatively high voltage levels. We reached a fairly-impressive 1840 MHz final clock using a 115 MHz reference frequency.
And yet, we hit that speed with a relatively conservative voltage setting just 0.0875 V over stock. That’s not much more than Asus uses by default when set to Auto, and the maximum setting is 0.50 V over stock. Asus’ default over-voltage is likely to hurt this board’s standing in our efficiency chart, where default voltage is used exclusively.
The E35M1-I Deluxe has more than enough memory timing adjustments for the typical overclocker. Our memory is programmed to default to DDR3-1333 CAS 9, and the board automatically set the correct timings after we manually chose its data rate.
Related Stories :
- The Brazos Round-Up: Eight AMD E-350-Based Motherboards
- ASRock's E350M1: AMD's Brazos Platform Hits The Desktop First
- Gigabyte Announces E350N Mini-ITX Motherboard
- Low-Power Gaming: AMD's E-350 Vs. Intel Atom D525 And Ion 2
- Asus Releases P9X79-E WS Motherboard, Supports 4-Way SLI
- EVGA Lifts Cover From X79 E779 Classified Motherboard
- Gigabyte launches four-way PCI-E X16 motherboard, premieres AMD-style chipset for Intel CPUs
- Testing The E-Class: 9 Pentium 4 Motherboards With The 845E Chipset
The Zotac board actually is available on Newegg
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6813500068
Only problem is that it is $160 instead of $130
Otherwise very nice roundup. I've been thinking of using one of these for a server/NAS.
Wow! AS-rocks!
Odd timing for the roundup, Llano just came out, these will be discontinued asap.
Not good for much save storage, but that wasn't tested. Would have much rather see an A8 board roundup since they are on newegg now. Picked up one myself for my htpc/storage setup.
Odd timing for the roundup, Llano just came out, these will be discontinued asap.Not good for much save storage, but that wasn't tested. Would have much rather see an A8 board roundup since they are on newegg now. Picked up one myself for my htpc/storage setup.
Uh no, Brazos is bast on the Bobcat core which is a low power version of Bulldozer. These are meant for ultra portables and netbooks, nettops, ultrathin notebooks and the likes.
Llano is the entry level desktop APU until they switch from Stars cores on those to the newer bulldozer cores.
Uh no, Brazos is bast on the Bobcat core which is a low power version of Bulldozer. These are meant for ultra portables and netbooks, nettops, ultrathin notebooks and the likes.
And yet this roundup is .... desktop boards.
And brazos has nothing in common with bulldozer.
Uh no, Brazos is bast on the Bobcat core which is a low power version of Bulldozer. These are meant for ultra portables and netbooks, nettops, ultrathin notebooks and the likes. Llano is the entry level desktop APU until they switch from Stars cores on those to the newer bulldozer cores.
And yet this roundup is .... desktop boards. And brazos has nothing in common with bulldozer.
Net TOP. Meaning a low power ITX board. Brazos is merely a stopgap till AMD has the tooling to kick out tons of BD cores. Though I will agree this roundup is a bit late it is at least thorough.
The Zotac board actually is available on Newegghttp://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6813500068Only problem is that it is $160 instead of $130Otherwise very nice roundup. I've been thinking of using one of these for a server/NAS.
Good call--that board only recently became available, after this story was scheduled to be published. We've since updated the conclusion and price chart to reflect the market as of July 4th, 2011.
Cheers,
Chris
Net TOP. Meaning a low power ITX board. Brazos is merely a stopgap till AMD has the tooling to kick out tons of BD cores. Though I will agree this roundup is a bit late it is at least thorough.
Brazos is NOT a stopgap, it is meant for very low power applications. It's basically AMD's take on Atom style devices. Bulldozer is not meant to scale to this low power envelope. That's why there are already plans for Brazos successors. Ontario/Zacate will be replaced by Khrishna/Wichita. Llano will be succeeded by Trinity, which is Bulldozer based. Zambezi is supposed to be succeeded by something called Komodo, which I haven't read much about.
Trinity and Komodo are both Enhanced Bulldozer. As such, Trinity will not be using Zambezi cores.
Well, aside from a few bits about Brazos being a stop-gap based on Bulldozer being wrong, the basic premise of "odd timing for a Brazos roundup" holds true.
Llano for laptops is out-freaking-standing, Llano for desktops is amazing for cheap OEM-built desktops and small form-factor HTPCs. TBH, it shouldn't excite much of anyone else, nor was it intended to replace Phenom II + dGPU for enthusiasts.
These CPUs and graphics are pitiful for a desktop system. Might as well buy a cheap laptop and hook it up to whatever display you want. You can buy a Toshiba P6200 with 4GB RAM, 320GB HDD, DVD RW, webcam, wireless, bluetooth and W7HP 64bit for less than $400.
When you ran an Atom board comparison, you included performance data for an old Pentium (or Athlon; don't remember). This was very helpful, as I'd get a feel for how good/bad is 5 minutes for your workload. Of course, this was just an anchor point, and would be excluded from any value/efficiency graphs.
Does anyone else feel the performance graphs would be more meaningful with a typical Atom and a cheap Athlon X2 as points of reference?
These are not design to be purely performer, we all know that. Their purpose is to compete with the Intel Atom processors.
For all the data that's included in the chart, it's quite astonishing that there's nothing to distinguish which boards use SO-DIMMs and which ones use DDR3-1333. Most users are going to care a LOT more about this than whether or not there exists an internal parallel port connector.
All of these setups are about twice as expensive as they should be. By the time you add all the trimmings to build up a complete system, you're spending nearly what you would for an economy desktop where a $100 WD TV or $200 pre-built Atom machine would be a much better investment. Wrapping a $10 chip in a $165 board just makes zero sense. In fact, I'd be very interested in seeing a detailed cost-breakdown on one of the more expensive boards - I just can't understand how they could possibly be valued so highly.
I would have liked to see how these perform as an HTPC. Can the handle BD at 1080i? How is websurfing? Can they place facebook games that my grandkids love... usefull things like that. We already know these cant game or handle intensive apps so why waste time benching these...
Perhaps a future article.
Nice round up!!
I really would love to use the AMD APUs for a lower power server application.
Only problem is that the boards are all 4x PCIE and single nic. Come on! Let see something with dual nics and 8x PCIE.
Yea yea yea Llano here now, but hell I've love to have an E-350 with a board like this. Its all about the power consumption baby!
Trinity and Komodo are both Enhanced Bulldozer. As such, Trinity will not be using Zambezi cores.
The name "enhanced" Bulldozer had me guessing. I wasn't sure if the cores would actually be different in Trinity, or if it was the same BD cores "enhanced" with graphics. Did you read anything more detailed on it?
Does anyone else feel the performance graphs would be more meaningful with a typical Atom and a cheap Athlon X2 as points of reference?
Well I always appreciate more data, so yes.
Here's a helpful document...
http://phx.corporate-ir.net/Extern [...] BlPTM=&t=1