The CPU Articles
- AMD's Smart Strike: Athlon X2 BE-2350
- Which is the Best Mainstream CPU?
- Remote PC Management with Intel's vPro
- Semiconductor Production 101
- The Gigahertz Battle: How Do Today's CPUs Stack Up?
- Dual Core Notebook CPUs Explored
- Does AMD's Athlon 64 X2 6000+ Have Any Kick Left?
- Extreme Overclocking
- Overclocking Guide Part 3: How To Gain 81% For $27
- 500 MHz FSB? Core 2 Duo Overtakes Core 2 Extreme
Intel vs. AMD: Power Dissipation and Efficiency
7:12 AM - July 11, 2007 by
Bert Töpelt
Source: Tom's Hardware US – Keywords: energy, efficiency, intel, left, out, in, the, cold
Syndication:
Source: Tom's Hardware US – Keywords: energy, efficiency, intel, left, out, in, the, cold
Syndication:
Table of Contents:
Intel vs. AMD: Power Dissipation and Efficiency
Power Dissipation: AMD Still in the Lead
As we have seen, Intel has significantly reduced the power dissipation of its Core 2 processors. Now, the next question is how the new stepping compares to the company's other processors and those from rival AMD.
We compared a number of AMD and Intel processors. On the AMD side, we have a selection of 90nm EE CPUs as well as the newer 65nm versions. The measurements were taken on the following boards:
Foxconn's Q9657MC-8KS2H Intel 965G board uses a 4-phase voltage regulator.
ECS's RS485M-M board is built around the ATI-RS485 chipset and utilizes a 3-phase voltage regulator.
We measure the power dissipation directly at the CPU socket, meaning that the board's voltage regulators are also factored into the final result.
- Previous page Intel's boxed cooler
- Next page Conserving Energy with a 3-Phase Design