Shop for All
|
Core 2 Duo E8400 Dual Core Processor |
Compare the top 5 lowest prices by hovering your mouse over the product names on the left |
$199.99 |
|
Core 2 Quad Q6600 Processor | $199.99 | |
|
Core i7 I7-920 Quad Core Processor | $349.99 | |
|
Core 2 Q9550 Quad Core Processor | $219.99 | |
|
Phenom II X4 940 Quad Core Processor | $189.99 |
- amd vs intel comparison chart
- energy efficient cpu
- amd vs intel power consumption
- amd vs intel core 2 duo
- intel energy efficient cpu
- power consumption intel chart
- intel core vs intel core 2
- energy efficient cpus
- amd energy efficient cpu
- intel new processors price
- cpu energy efficiency
- energy efficient core 2 duo
- best processor for the price
- stepping core
- amd athlon vs intel core 2 duo
Partners
The Games selection
violent :
Friday the 24th
Exterminate Santa Claus's elves. Use the arrows to move, S to grab the elves, and A or W to attack them with your sword.
|
violent :
Interactive Buddy
Unwind on your interactive buddy: Do anything you want to him, it will earn you money, and you can buy other stuff to torture him with.
|
Sponsored links
Energy Efficiency: AMD vs. Intel
Table of contents
- 1 – Energy Efficiency: AMD vs. Intel
- 2 – Energy Efficiency: AMD vs. Intel
- 3 – Energy Efficiency: AMD vs. Intel
- 4 – The retail box carries a product sticker with the spec-number, namely th...
- 5 – The cheaper tray versions of the processors are sold in a simple, unmark...
- 6 – Energy Efficiency: AMD vs. Intel
- 7 – Low power state for the L2 stepping...
- 8 – Intel's boxed cooler
- 9 – Intel vs. AMD: Power Dissipation and Efficiency
Intel Disappoints in Energy Efficiency

For several years, Intel was unable to keep the energy requirements of its processors low. One reason can be found in the unfortunate 90nm Pentium 4 Prescott design. Additionally, Intel implemented only a small range of energy saving features, which resulted in only minimal savings at the end of the day.

AMD, on the other hand, was able to shine in this green discipline ever since the introduction of its Athlon 64 line of processors with their Cool-and-Quiet functionality in 2003, leaving Intel far behind. However, three quarters of a year ago, Intel launched its Core 2 processors. The power demands of the current incarnation of this micro architecture, dubbed Conroe, are dramatically lower than that of its predecessors. Accordingly, the Core 2 line is considered a highly efficient processor.
However, although the Core 2 is a very efficient processor and possesses very intelligent power management features, such as the ability to deactivate unused areas of the cache, it still draws up to 24 watts in idle mode. As a result, the entire line of Intel's desktop processors still lag far behind AMD's offerings in this respect.

In order to remedy this situation, Intel recently introduced a new stepping of its Core 2 processors. According to the chipmaker, the new so-called L2 stepping is able to reduce the processors' power draw to a maximum of 12 watts when idle - only half of what the previous stepping used.
So far the newer stepping is only found in the lower-clocked Core 2 models. It would seem that implementing the power-saving features in the bigger, faster models is proving more difficult.
In this article we measure the power consumption of Intel's new L2 stepping and compare it to other Intel and AMD CPUs currently available in the market.
In order to facilitate this comparison, we took exhaustive measurements and put the results into extensive charts to highlight the following points:
- Energy efficiency
- Overall power consumption
- Energy cost
- Processor price/energy cost index
- The correct main board
We conducted all measurements under a variety of load scenarios in order to determine the best processor for different tasks, such as office productivity, high-performance/gaming and low-energy PCs.
Ultimately, we wanted to find out whether buying a special low-power CPU is actually worth the investment.
- Thermodynamics, Energy, Food: What The Fanboys Neet To Know [Old Man/Woman's Club]
- Larrabee. Thoughts? [Graphic & Displays]
- Gigabyte GA-965P-DS rev 3.3 changes & quirks I noticed [Motherboards & Memory]
- How low can nVidia go? [Graphic & Displays]
- Hybrid Crossfire 780G w/ 3870? [Graphic & Displays]
Questions? Ask Tom's community!
Sponsored links
Related news
- Sun, AMD call for creation of energy efficiency metric for servers
- Intel Claims Core Microprocessors Saved World Economy $2 Billion In Energy Costs
- WWF Slaps U.S. Government Over Lack Of Energy Efficiency Progress
- Osram: Efficiency of LED-BLUs to approach that of CCFL starting in 2007
- Intel proposes new power efficiency focused CPU benchmark
