The Internal Storage Articles
- Enthusiast 2.5" HDDs: Speed or Capacity?
- Storage Accessories for Geeks and Pros
- Should You Care About Hybrid Hard Drives?
- WD's 750 GB Hard Disk Sets New Records
- WD Brings 250 GB HDDs to Notebooks
- 1.8" Hard Drives Hit 100 GB
- The Spring Hard Drive Guide
- Notebook HDDs Deluxe: 160 GB by Fujitsu, Seagate, Toshiba
- Hitachi's 7K1000 Terabyte Hard Drive
- The Best in Enterprise Hard Drives
Related Content
I/O Benchmark Results
6:46 AM - August 13, 2007 by
Patrick Schmid
Source: Tom's Hardware US – Keywords: flash, based, hard, drives, cometh
Syndication:
Source: Tom's Hardware US – Keywords: flash, based, hard, drives, cometh
Syndication:
Table of Contents:
I/O Benchmark Results

Only 40 I/O operations per seconds for a single drive or 40-50 I/Os per second for the RAID 0 setup is almost half the I/O performance of a traditional hard drive with the IOmeter database benchmark. Although a database benefits from a SSD's quick read speed performance, it can get bottlenecked if multiple write requests come in at the same time. As command queues increase, the single hard drive does not even scale up, as this flash-based HDD does not support command queuing.

The performance of flash HDD in a RAID 0 array can keep up with conventional 2.5" drives under normal file server workloads (with reads and writes for varying file sizes). However, a single flash HDD cannot match the performance that a traditional HDD offers.
- Previous page Read Transfer Performance
- Next page I/O, Continued