Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

Semi-Automatic Parallel Parking With Active Park Assist

SYNC With MyFord Touch: Automotive Infotainment For All
By

Ford offers Active Park Assist as a $695 option on its 2012 Ford Focuses, along with its larger vehicles. Active Park Assist is, as the name implies, a parking assistance system that helps the driver parallel park. You might think of it as a novelty if you can already parallel park well, but it's actually a cool feature that does work.

Cars equipped with Active Park Assist employ ultra-sonic sensors on the front and rear bumpers to help the system calculate available space. It requires very little driver input, aide from gas and brakes. 

Simply, you push a button as you approach the parallel parking area, and the system figures out the rest. When a suitable spot is detected, Active Park Assist tells you to put the car in reverse or drive. Your job is to cautiously feather the gas and brake pedals, since the system only controls the steering wheel. Truly, if you crash while using this feature, it's your own fault.

Unfortunately, our 2012 Ford Focus Titanium test mule did not come equipped with the Active Park Assist option. Fortunately, Korum Automotive Group in Puyallup, Wash., our local Ford and Lincoln dealership, stepped in to let us borrow a 2013 Lincoln MKS with Active Park Assist for a couple hours, allowing us to demonstrate the system in action.

Yes, the Lincoln MKS is a much larger car than Ford's Focus. However, the system works identically on both cars (along with other Ford and Lincoln vehicles), utilizing ultra-sonic sensors in the front and back of the car, along with a backup camera that shows where you’re going. If Active Park Assist can properly place a full-size Lincoln MKS, then parking a Focus should be even easier. 

We had Korum's car for two hours, and were able to test it in our makeshift parallel parking situation at the dealership. Again, the system works well and parked our car as expected, every time. We'll warn you: the first time at the wheel of a car navigating its way into a tight space is extremely unnerving. Active Park Assist has no problem getting really close to other cars, and it's constantly beeping. The sense that you're about to hit something is constant until you're fully parked. After a couple of test runs, however, trusting Active Park Assist to do its job, the process became much less stressful. At best, we were able to get the Lincoln MKS parked in less than two minutes. That might be too long if you're sticking out in traffic on a busy street. But for less rushed parking jobs, it's satisfactory.

Display all 48 comments.
This thread is closed for comments
Top Comments
  • 10 Hide
    mayankleoboy1 , May 31, 2012 4:59 AM
    boot benchmarks for a car :o 
    What is the world coming to?
Other Comments
  • -3 Hide
    jhansonxi , May 31, 2012 4:58 AM
    SYNC is the reason that Ford's . I've also met several people who have SYNC and they've all had problems with it freezing completely or controls getting stuck. These problems either require them to stop and turn off the engine (a reboot) or take the car to a dealer to get SYNC reset.

    This is shockingly bad code quality for an embedded system. I may get a Ford vehicle in the future but it won't have SYNC in it. I'll epoxy a tablet to the dash if I need entertainment that bad.
  • -1 Hide
    jhansonxi , May 31, 2012 4:59 AM
    SYNC is the reason that Ford's quality has dropped:
    http://money.cnn.com/2011/06/22/autos/ford_jd_power_initial_quality/index.htm

    P.S. What's up with the broken URL parsing?
  • 10 Hide
    mayankleoboy1 , May 31, 2012 4:59 AM
    boot benchmarks for a car :o 
    What is the world coming to?
  • 3 Hide
    SteelCity1981 , May 31, 2012 6:08 AM
    never had a problem with my SYNC in my ford.
  • 1 Hide
    TheZander , May 31, 2012 6:14 AM
    Drove a brand new rental Ford with all the Sync options. It was nice to be able to play music straight from my phone without taking it out of my pocket or plugging anything in. It was also nice when a call came in and a simple button push switched seamlessly from my music to the call, with good voice quality I might add. The information provided is useful and placed in areas with a focus on keeping your eyes in safer directions than some layouts, and the steering wheel button placement makes sense and also works well (for the most part) once you get used to it.

    However, there are little things here and there that show the system has tremendous potential, but lacks polish you expect when it's in your automobile. I own a reasonably new Ford (2006 Freestyle.) It's been an exceptional, sturdy, and reliable car for several years now with no mechanical issues to date. My dad owns an old Lincoln Navigator with over 370,000 miles on it, still with the original engine running. Fords have been pretty good to me and my family over the years. You put in the key, turn it, and the thing runs. You push the buttons on the door and the windows go up or down. Flip a switch and the heater comes on.

    You expect your automobiles to be like this. Ford Sync does not yet feel like this. "Do I push this button this way or that way?" "What word order do I need to use for this command?" "Why do I have to re-command Sync to start playing my phone's music via bluetooth every time I start my car rather than it just start automatically?" "Why does the system hang once in a while for no apparent reason?"

    It just doesn't yet feel like it's reliable and responsive. I was intrigued and impressed by Sync, but it needs more polish, fluidity, refinement, and most of all consistency and reliability for it to please the masses day after day, and THIS is why Sync is the single worst factor in Ford's otherwise good reliability ratings being lowered, as mentioned above.
  • -5 Hide
    danwat1234 , May 31, 2012 6:15 AM
    I like my 1999 Honda Civic. Bullet proof reliable with 226K miles, simple and fast around corners (with an upgraded rear sway bar and good all season tires). It came with AM/FM radio and that's it. I have an FM transmitter to run anything else. All of this fancy technology ... my gaming laptop and my basic 10-key cell phone is enough. But it's great that this tech is available in inexpensive cars.
    I don't think that anybody would buy a new car just for this technology, at least I hope not. But new cars also come with stability, traction, ABS, EBD and panic brake help which is nice.
    My next car will be electric, maybe a 3-wheeled Zaptera. That's a reason to upgrade!
  • 3 Hide
    tuanies , May 31, 2012 6:20 AM
    Quote:
    SYNC is the reason that Ford's quality has dropped:
    http://money.cnn.com/2011/06/22/autos/ford_jd_power_initial_quality/index.htm

    P.S. What's up with the broken URL parsing?


    We touch on that in the conclusion. V2.0 of the software fixed a lot of the crashes and issues. We did not experience any crashes during the week we had the car.
  • 0 Hide
    tuanies , May 31, 2012 6:25 AM
    Quote:
    I like my 1999 Honda Civic. Bullet proof reliable with 226K miles, simple and fast around corners (with an upgraded rear sway bar and good all season tires). It came with AM/FM radio and that's it. I have an FM transmitter to run anything else. All of this fancy technology ... my gaming laptop and my basic 10-key cell phone is enough. But it's great that this tech is available in inexpensive cars.
    I don't think that anybody would buy a new car just for this technology, at least I hope not. But new cars also come with stability, traction, ABS, EBD and panic brake help which is nice.
    My next car will be electric, maybe a 3-wheeled Zaptera. That's a reason to upgrade!


    That sounds fancy, my daily is a '90 Miata with no power steering, manual windows, no side door guard beams and a first generation airbag. Its a ton of fun though.
  • 0 Hide
    s3anister , May 31, 2012 7:10 AM
    This is cool tech but I wish ford would have started doing this a year or two earlier than they did. I'd love to see an HDMI input instead of composite in and a higher-res screen for example.
  • 0 Hide
    tuanies , May 31, 2012 8:38 AM
    Quote:
    This is cool tech but I wish ford would have started doing this a year or two earlier than they did. I'd love to see an HDMI input instead of composite in and a higher-res screen for example.


    HDMI input would be nice. I think Honda is the only one that has HDMI input on the Honda Odyssey, but only on the $45k Elite model.
  • 1 Hide
    A Bad Day , May 31, 2012 12:25 PM
    mayankleoboy1boot benchmarks for a car What is the world coming to?


    Don't worry, eventually there will be overclocking benchmarks for a car...
  • 0 Hide
    CaedenV , May 31, 2012 1:08 PM
    wow, that interface is incredibly slow and terrible! I understand that it is a portable device... but it is a car, with an engine, not a mobile phone. If they can make airbags that check if they need to go off at any given moment, then surely they could put a storage device in the vehicle that can load maps in under 1sec, and find a route in 1/2 the time this does...
    I mean my 3 year old GPS can do it... and it isn't exactly a 'top of the line' model either.
  • 3 Hide
    radon_antila , May 31, 2012 1:10 PM
    A Bad DayDon't worry, eventually there will be overclocking benchmarks for a car...


    CarMark Record: 1982 DeLorean, OC'd to 1.21 jigawatts on water (1985)
  • -1 Hide
    CaedenV , May 31, 2012 1:19 PM
    Oh! and I like the idea of the 'my key' feature... but let's work on it a bit
    -there are roads in America that have speed limits of 70 and 75mph (you would imagine an American car company would know this...). Lets have a few more speed limiting options. Personally I like to cruise at ~70-75mph on the freeway, but as people do not know how to drive in my area it is not really safe to use cruise control and just zone out in a lane (people WILL merge right into you... annoying). Perhaps limit it to 5mph over the limit?
    -Include power seat settings
    -Include favorite radio station settings, or built in playlists
    -Include temp settings (prefered fan speed, and temp)

    Good idea, bad implementation... just like every other integration of PC tech in a car.
  • 1 Hide
    cknobman , May 31, 2012 1:46 PM
    I had a 2008 Lincoln MKX with a fully decked out SYNC system in it and my wife and I loved it. We never experienced crashes or freezes of any kind.

    We traded it in for our 2011 Prius fully loaded with Toyotas tech package. I can say without a doubt that SYNC beats Toyota's system hand down. SYNC is quicker, easier, and has more capabilities.
  • -1 Hide
    warezme , May 31, 2012 2:21 PM
    ..., dang, I just put a flip down CD player with ipod connector on my 69 MGB roadster.
  • 0 Hide
    Bugsy68 , May 31, 2012 3:46 PM
    My dad had SYNC in his Mercury and he loved it! He got a new Lincoln Town Car last year that didn't have SYNC and now he really misses it. Is there any way to add it to his car? Is it even possible to add it? Any idea how much it would cost? My guess is that it wouldn't involve too much more than swapping out the radio since the car is pretty basic technology-wise (unlike the car above and it's lcd displays etc).
  • 0 Hide
    Anonymous , May 31, 2012 3:47 PM
    Had Sync in my 2010 Escape and now the MyFord touch in 2012 Edge (leased both) have really enjoyed the features. Worth it just for the hands free calling
  • 1 Hide
    ikefu , May 31, 2012 4:09 PM
    The hands free calling and voice dialing in my 2012 Escape seems to just work better than most other implementations in other brands that I have rented. I'm a big fan of Ford's recent vehicle quality. Woot for American brands not just pulling their head out of the sands but actually getting out there and kicking some serious butt again.
  • -1 Hide
    jimmysmitty , May 31, 2012 4:17 PM
    Bugsy68My dad had SYNC in his Mercury and he loved it! He got a new Lincoln Town Car last year that didn't have SYNC and now he really misses it. Is there any way to add it to his car? Is it even possible to add it? Any idea how much it would cost? My guess is that it wouldn't involve too much more than swapping out the radio since the car is pretty basic technology-wise (unlike the car above and it's lcd displays etc).


    He just needs to go to the dealer, Ford or Lincoln, and ask. They should be able to add any features to the car. Thats what the sales guy I got my 2012 Fusion told me. Of course it will cost a bit of money but it might be worth it in the end. I am contemplating adding SYNC as it would be nice to have but then I also want other extras added to my Fusion......
Display more comments