Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

Conclusion

USB 3.0 To The Front Panel: ASRock Leads The Way
By

ASRock was the first to respond to our pleas for a front-panel USB 3.0 connector, and it appears its choice was a good one. Though we occasionally saw minute differences between the performance of onboard and front-panel cable headers, the difference went both ways and is likely an indication of motherboard design optimizations.

The P55 Extreme4’s use of PCIe 1.1 pathways caused a more marked loss in performance than we saw by moving the cable from one connector to another, but we view that as an Intel issue. Had Intel wanted its P55 to provide high-speed controller interfaces, it would have included those in its original design.

What wasn’t apparently an issue with Intel was the design of the front-panel pin connector. We were told by engineers of other firms that a pin-style connector wouldn’t be adequate for the data rates of USB 3.0, yet ASRock claims to have picked this one up based on a design proposal from Intel. Backing that claim is the fact that many other motherboard manufacturers are now using the same interface, and this standardization is the chief thing we were looking for at the start of this saga.

As other companies continue to copy this interface, we’d like to thank ASRock for “getting the ball rolling” on an issue that will hopefully help us all as the gradual proliferation of USB 3.0 makes the technology more influential in our component choices.

Ask a Category Expert

Create a new thread in the Reviews comments forum about this subject

Example: Notebook, Android, SSD hard drive

Display all 49 comments.
This thread is closed for comments
Top Comments
  • 14 Hide
    takeapieandrun , October 1, 2010 6:32 AM
    New standards = competition = win for us
  • 10 Hide
    razor512 , October 1, 2010 7:14 AM
    Now all they need to do is lead the way with a standardized case connector.
Other Comments
  • 8 Hide
    jupiter optimus maximus , October 1, 2010 6:30 AM
    Thank you ASRock for bringing USB3.0 front header on your motherboards! Now i can expect a much nicer set-up in my case in an upcoming build...
  • 14 Hide
    takeapieandrun , October 1, 2010 6:32 AM
    New standards = competition = win for us
  • 10 Hide
    razor512 , October 1, 2010 7:14 AM
    Now all they need to do is lead the way with a standardized case connector.
  • 3 Hide
    darthvidor , October 1, 2010 7:20 AM
    I sure hope the standard connector comes out before this gets out of hand.
  • 5 Hide
    117killer117 , October 1, 2010 7:49 AM
    Hopefully some other motherboard manufacturers catch on.
  • 5 Hide
    Crashman , October 1, 2010 8:32 AM
    razor512Now all they need to do is lead the way with a standardized case connector.
    darthvidorI sure hope the standard connector comes out before this gets out of hand.
    You're looking at it, Page 1 photo. Other motherboard manufacturers are already using this same connector as mentioned in the article, so it should only be a matter of a few months before case manufacturers follow suit.
  • -2 Hide
    Anonymous , October 1, 2010 8:58 AM
    ASRock responds to pleas? Maybe someone could plead for dual-gigabit-ethernet equipped SOC-chipped (atom? i3?) 6x sata2 motherboards, too. It's impossible to build your one-machine-to-rule them all firewall-server-htpc in a small form factor currently!
  • 0 Hide
    liquidsnake718 , October 1, 2010 9:52 AM
    Yeah i remember reading reports that Intel dithed USB 3.0 about 6 months ago in favor of the mb and new CPU research (P66, 67). Surprisingly they sold this tech or the design to ASROCK. Im sure they will eventually come around to implimenting this for ALL future motherboards.

    So would old cases be able to use this since it is just a connector?
  • 0 Hide
    Crashman , October 1, 2010 10:11 AM
    liquidsnake718Yeah i remember reading reports that Intel dithed USB 3.0 about 6 months ago in favor of the mb and new CPU research (P66, 67). Surprisingly they sold this tech or the design to ASROCK. Im sure they will eventually come around to implimenting this for ALL future motherboards. So would old cases be able to use this since it is just a connector?
    Revised cases could use it, if they had the new cable and connector. Remember that USB 2.0 and USB 3.0 are not cross-compatible, they use separate signal pins and share only power and ground with each other.
  • 1 Hide
    mauller07 , October 1, 2010 10:24 AM
    They should have kept the board like the 890gx extreme 3 without all the legacy rubbish like floppy or pata, when looking at the boar layouts in comparison this extreme 4 just looks messy
  • 3 Hide
    Crashman , October 1, 2010 10:41 AM
    mauller07They should have kept the board like the 890gx extreme 3 without all the legacy rubbish like floppy or pata, when looking at the boar layouts in comparison this extreme 4 just looks messy
    ASRock still markets in places where Windows XP prevails. That means that the floppy header is still more valuable than most of us would like to believe.
  • 6 Hide
    pinkfloydminnesota , October 1, 2010 12:09 PM
    Thicker color lines in the legend so we can see what color they are, please.
  • 5 Hide
    Deadstick50 , October 1, 2010 12:30 PM
    What I take from this article is the fact that Inhell hobbles all the good features that AMD doesnt! And people wonder why I always recomend AMD? GET REAL.....get AMD for the performance you deserve! (this add brought to you by..........nobody, I just really like AMD)
  • 1 Hide
    Onus , October 1, 2010 2:09 PM
    While I wouldn't go quite as far as Deadstick50, I did take from this article that P55 is just not the way to go; not if you expect any kind of future-resistance, i.e. to take full advantage of high speed USB 3.0 peripherals.
  • 1 Hide
    Deadstick50 , October 1, 2010 2:13 PM
    Yeah, but look at Intels implementation of PCI-E, its chanelled wrong and limited in scope...i stand by what i said.
  • 1 Hide
    theoutbound , October 1, 2010 2:14 PM
    If nothing else, I'm glad ASRock did this so other manufacturers will be forced to include front USB3. Manufacturers have been very slow to offer this, and it's nice to see someone begin to step up.
  • -1 Hide
    Onus , October 1, 2010 2:38 PM
    It's not "Intel," it's the chipset and/or CPU; consider that X58 offers full speed and full functionality. A lesser AMD chipset (like 870) would chop out some lanes and/or features too.
  • 0 Hide
    zyzeast , October 1, 2010 2:44 PM
    I got the x58 extreme 6 when it came out on Newegg and loving it so far, just wish it had more on-board USB 2.0 connectors.
  • 0 Hide
    False_Dmitry_II , October 1, 2010 2:46 PM
    jtt283It's not "Intel," it's the chipset and/or CPU; consider that X58 offers full speed and full functionality. A lesser AMD chipset (like 870) would chop out some lanes and/or features too.


    Yeah, like the second graphics card slot. Wait, that's another 16 lanes that can be used even if some were removed resulting in similar other stuff as the higher mobos. Sorry the fact that intel limited that entire platform to that low is insane and ridiculous.
  • 3 Hide
    ares1214 , October 1, 2010 4:10 PM
    Asrock, you done good. You guys are always make boards with features other people dont have, or more of them. 870 board with 2 x16 lanes, more USB 3 than most, so on and so forth. Good prices too. Now just make sure they are quality.
Display more comments