AMD FX-8350 Review: Does Piledriver Fix Bulldozer's Flaws?
Last year, AMD launched its Bulldozer architecture to disappointed enthusiasts who were hoping to see the company rise to its former glory. Today, we get an FX processor based on the Piledriver update. Does it give power users something to celebrate?
Benchmark Results: World Of Warcraft: Mists Of Pandaria
World of Warcraft is another title where AMD simply hasn’t done well in the past. At 1680x1050, the difference between each of our contenders is most obvious. FX-8150 manages to outmaneuver the Phenom II CPUs. However, FX-8350 improves performance even more than the Bulldozer architecture. That doesn’t stop Intel’s Ivy Bridge-based chips from outperforming, though.
Naturally, as resolution increases, the significance of graphics starts outweighing the influence of CPU speed. But even at 2560x1600 using the Ultra quality preset, it’s still clear that Vishera serves up a nice gain over Zambezi, and that both AMD packages continue to get beaten by Intel’s Sandy and Ivy Bridge-based processors.
Stay on the Cutting Edge
Join the experts who read Tom's Hardware for the inside track on enthusiast PC tech news — and have for over 25 years. We'll send breaking news and in-depth reviews of CPUs, GPUs, AI, maker hardware and more straight to your inbox.
Current page: Benchmark Results: World Of Warcraft: Mists Of Pandaria
Prev Page Benchmark Results: The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim Next Page Power Consumption And Efficiency