Page 1:Can FX, APUs, And Pentium Processors All Game?
Page 2:Test System And Benchmarks
Page 3:Benchmark Results: Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim
Page 4:Benchmark Results: Battlefield 3
Page 5:Benchmark Results: Just Cause 2
Page 6:Benchmark Results: StarCraft II
Page 7:Benchmark Results: DiRT 3
Page 8:Benchmark Results: Metro 2033
Page 9:Overclocking Benchmarks
Page 10:AMD Or Intel: Which Offers Better Gaming Performance?
Up until now, we've primarily gauged performance based on stock clock rates. However, most of Intel's CPU suffer manufacturer-imposed limitations on overclocking, while AMD facilitates a more enthusiast-friendly attitude to the modification of its chips.
Given this significant differentiation, we thought it important to more aggressively tune the multiplier-unlocked models in our round-up to see how the results change.
Because StarCraft II proved to be such a good indicator of processor performance, we'll start our testing with that game.
All of the overclocked models (except AMD's A8-3870K) post notable performance gains, with results comparable to Intel's stock Core i3-2100. With that in mind, though, none of the processors come close to challenging an unmodified Core i5-2400.
Overclocking helps each of AMD's unlocked chips gain in meaningful ways. However, none can reach the Core i3-2100's minimum frame rate. Meanwhile, the Core i5-2400 remains comfortably out of reach.
A trend emerges in this third data point. The overclocked processors perform behind or close to a stock Core i3-2100.
- Can FX, APUs, And Pentium Processors All Game?
- Test System And Benchmarks
- Benchmark Results: Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim
- Benchmark Results: Battlefield 3
- Benchmark Results: Just Cause 2
- Benchmark Results: StarCraft II
- Benchmark Results: DiRT 3
- Benchmark Results: Metro 2033
- Overclocking Benchmarks
- AMD Or Intel: Which Offers Better Gaming Performance?