What about this other card that’s not on the list? How do I know if it’s a good deal or not?
This will happen. In fact, because inventory levels and prices change quickly, it’s guaranteed to happen. So how do you know if that card you’ve got your eye on is a good buy in its price range?
Here is a resource to help you judge if a card is a good buy or not. The graphics card hierarchy chart groups graphics cards with similar overall performance levels into tiers. The top tier contains the highest-performing cards available, and performance decreases as you go down the tiers from there.
You can use this hierarchy to compare the pricing between two cards, to see which one is a better deal, and also to determine if an upgrade is worthwhile. I don’t recommend upgrading your graphics card unless the replacement card is at least three tiers higher. Otherwise, the upgrade is somewhat parallel, and you may not even notice any worthwhile difference in performance.
At the request of readers, we've added mobile graphics and integrated chipsets to the hierarchy chart. We want to make it clear that there is very little performance data available for these graphics solutions. While the discrete video cards in the chart are placed in tiers based on a lot of information, many of the mobile and integrated devices in the chart are guesstimates based on their specifications. At worst, we doubt they’re more than one tier away from their actual performance, but this is something to keep in mind when considering mobile graphics chipsets.
| Graphics Card Hierarchy Chart | ||
|---|---|---|
| GeForce | Radeon | Intel |
| Discrete: GTX Titan Z | Discrete: R9 295X2 | |
| Discrete: GTX 690 | Discrete: HD 7990 | |
| Discrete: GTX 780 Ti, 980, Titan Black | ||
| Discrete: GTX 780, 970, Titan | Discrete: R9 290, 290X | |
| Discrete: GTX 590, 680, 770 Go (mobile): 980M | Discrete: HD 6990, 7970 GHz Ed, R9 280X | |
| Discrete: GTX 580, GTX 670 Go (mobile): 970M | Discrete: HD 5970, 7870 LE (XT), 7950, 280, 285 | |
| Discrete: GTX 660 Ti, GTX 760 Go (mobile): 880M | Discrete: HD 7870, R9 270, 270X | |
| Discrete: GTX 295, 480, 570, 660 Go (mobile): 680M, 780M | Discrete: HD 4870 X2, 6970, 7850, R7 265, Mobility: 7970M | |
| Discrete: GTX 470, 560 Ti, 560 Ti 448 Core, 650 Ti Boost, 750 Ti | Discrete: HD 4850 X2, 5870, 6950, R7 260X Mobility: 7950M | |
| Discrete: GTX 560, 650 Ti, 750 Go (mobile): 580M, 675M | Discrete: HD 5850, 6870, 7790 Mobility: 6990M | |
| Discrete: 9800 GX2, 285, 460 256-bit, 465 | Discrete: HD 6850, 7770, R7 260 Mobility: 6900M | |
| Discrete: GTX 260, 275, 280, 460 192-bit, 460 SE, 550 Ti, 560 SE, GT 650, GT 740 GDDR5 Go (mobile): 570M, 670M | Discrete: HD 4870, 5770, 4890, 5830, 6770, 6790, 7750 (GDDR5), R7 250 (GDDR5) Mobility: HD 5870, 6800M | |
| Discrete: 8800 Ultra, 9800 GTX, 9800 GTX+, GTS 250, GTS 450 Go (mobile): 560M, 660M | Discrete: HD 3870 X2, 4850, 5750, 6750, 7750 (DDR3), R7 250 (DDR3) Mobility: HD 4850, 5850, 7870M | |
| Discrete: 8800 GTX, 8800 GTS 512 MB, GT 545 (GDDR5), GT 730 64-bit GDDR5 Go (mobile): GTX 280M, 285M, 555M (GDDR5) | Discrete: HD 4770 Mobility: HD 4860, 7770M, 7850M | |
| Discrete: 8800 GT 512 MB, 9800 GT, GT 545 (DDR3), GT 640 (DDR3), GT 740 DDR3 Go (mobile): 9800M GTX, GTX 260M (112), GTS 360M (GDDR5), 555M (DDR3) | Discrete: HD 4830, HD 5670, HD 6670 (GDDR5), HD 7730 (GDDR5) Mobility: HD 5770, HD 5750, 6600M/6700M (GDDR5), 7750M | |
| Discrete: 8800 GTS 640 MB, 9600 GT, GT 240 (GDDR5) Go (mobile): 9800M GTS, GTX 160M | Discrete: HD 2900 XT, HD 3870, HD 5570 (GDDR5), HD 6570 (GDDR5) Mobility: 6500M (GDDR5), 6600M/6700M (DDR3), 7730M | |
| Discrete: 8800 GS, 9600 GSO, GT 240 (DDR3) Go (mobile): GTX 260M (96), GTS 150M, GTS 360M (DDR3) | Discrete: HD 3850 512 MB, HD 4670, HD 5570 (DDR3), HD 6570 (DDR3), HD 6670 (DDR3), HD 7730 (DDR3), R7 240 Mobility: HD 3870, HD 5730, HD 5650, 6500M (DDR3) | |
| Discrete: 8800 GT 256 MB, 8800 GTS 320 MB, GT 440 GDDR5, GT 630 GDDR5, GT 730 128-bit GDDR5 Go (mobile): 8800M | Discrete: HD 2900 PRO, HD 3850 256 MB, 5550 (GDDR5) Mobility: HD 3850 | |
| Discrete: 7950 GX2, GT 440 DDR3, GT 630 DDR3, GT 730 128-bit DDR3 | Discrete: X1950 XTX, HD 4650 (DDR3), 5550 (DDR3) Integrated: HD 7660D | |
| Discrete: 7800 GTX 512, 7900 GTO, 7900 GTX, GT 430, GT 530 Go (mobile): 550M | Discrete: X1900 XT, X1950 XT, X1900 XTX | |
| Discrete: 7800 GTX, 7900 GT, 7950 G, GT 220 (DDR3) Go (mobile): 525M, 540M | Discrete: X1800 XT, X1900 AIW, X1900 GT, X1950 Pro, HD 2900 GT, HD 5550 (DDR2) Integrated: HD 7560D | |
| Discrete: 7800 GT, 7900 GS, 8600 GTS, 9500 GT (GDDR3), GT 220 (DDR2) Go (mobile): 7950 GTX | Discrete: X1800 XL, X1950 GT, HD 4650 (DDR2), HD 6450, R5 230 Mobility: X1800 XT, HD 4650, HD 5165, 6400M Integrated: HD 6620G, 6550D, 7540D | |
| Discrete: 6800 Ultra, 7600 GT, 7800 GS, 8600 GS, 8600 GT (GDDR3), 9500 GT (DDR2) Go (mobile): 7800 GTX, 7900 GTX | Discrete: X800 XT (& PE), X850 XT (& PE), X1650 XT, X1800 GTO, HD 2600 XT, HD 3650 (DDR3), HD 3670 Mobility: X1900, 3670 Integrated: 6520G, 6530D, 7480D | Integrated: Intel HD Graphics 4000 |
| Discrete: 6800 GT, 6800 GS (PCIe), 8600 GT (DDR2), GT 520 Go (mobile): 7800, Go 7900 GS, 520M, 520MX | Discrete: X800 XL, X800 GTO2/GTO16, HD 2600 Pro, HD 3650 (DDR2), Mobility: X800 XT, HD 2600 XT, 3650 Integrated: 6410D, 6480G | |
| Discrete: 6800 GS (AGP) Go (mobile): 6800 Ultra, 7600 GT, 8600M GT, 8700M GT, 410M | Discrete: X800 GTO 256 MB, X800 PRO, X850 Pro, X1650 GT Mobility: HD 2600 Integrated: 6370D, 6380G | |
| Discrete: 6800, 7300 GT GDDR3, 7600 GS, 8600M GS Go (mobile): 6800, 7700 | Discrete: X800, X800 GTO 128 MB, X1600 XT, X1650 Pro Mobility: X1800, HD 5145, HD 5470 (GDDR5) | |
| Discrete: 6600 GT, 6800LE, 6800 XT, 7300 GT (DDR2), 8500 GT, 9400 GT Go (mobile): 7600 (128-bit) | Discrete: 9800 XT, X700 PRO, X800 GT, X800 SE, X1300 XT, X1600 PRO, HD 2400 XT, HD 4350, HD 4550, HD 5450 Mobility: X800, 3470, HD 5470 (DDR3), HD 5450, HD 5430, 6300M Integrated: HD 6310, HD 6320 | Integrated: Intel HD Graphics 3000 |
| Discrete: FX 5900, FX 5900 Ultra, FX 5950 Ultra, 6600 (128-bit) Go (mobile): 6800 (128-bit) Integrated: 9300, 9400 | Discrete: 9700, 9700 Pro, 9800, 9800 Pro, X700, X1300 Pro, X1550, HD 2400 Pro Mobility: X1450, X1600, X1700, 2400 XT, X2500, 3450 Integrated: HD 3200, HD 3300, HD 4200, HD 4250, HD 4290, HD 6250, HD 6290 | |
| Discrete: FX 5800 Ultra, FX 5900 XT Go (mobile): 6600, Go 7600 (64-bit) | Discrete: 9500 Pro, 9600 XT, 9800 Pro (128-bit), X600 XT, X1050 (128-bit) Mobility: 9800, X700, X1350, X1400, X2300, HD 2400 | Integrated: Intel HD Graphics (Core i5-6x1), 2000 |
| Discrete: 4 Ti 4600, 4 Ti 4800, FX 5700 Ultra, 6200, 8300, 8400 G, G 210, G 310 Go (mobile): 315M | Discrete: 9600 PRO, 9800 LE, X600 PRO, HD 2300 Mobility: 9700 (128-bit), X600, X1300 Integrated: Xpress 1250 | Integrated: Intel HD Graphics (Core i3 5x0, Core i5-6x0) |
| Discrete: 4 Ti4200, 4 Ti4400, 4 Ti4800 SE, FX 5600 Ultra, FX 5700, 6600 (64-bit), 7300 GS, 8400M GS, 9300M G, 9300M GS | Discrete: 9500, 9550, 9600, X300, X1050 (64-bit) Mobility: 9600 | Integrated: Intel HD Graphics (Pentium G) |
| Discrete: 3 Ti500, FX 5200 Ultra, FX 5600, FX 5700 LE, 6200 TC, 6600 LE, 7200 GS, 7300 LE Go (mobile): 5700, 8200M, 9200M GS, 9100 Integrated: 8200, 8300 | Discrete: 8500, 9100, 9000 PRO, 9600 LE, X300 SE, X1150 Mobility 9700 (64-bit) | Integrated: GMA X4500 |
| Discrete: 3, 3 Ti200, FX 5200 (128-bit), FX 5500, Go (mobile): 5600, 6200, 6400, 7200, 7300, 7400 (64-bit) | Discrete: 9000, 9200, 9250 Mobility: 9600 (64-bit), X300 | |
| Discrete: FX 5200 (64 bit) Go (mobile): 7200, 7400 (32-bit) Integrated: 6100, 6150, 7025, 7050 | Discrete: 9200 SE Integrated: Xpress 200M, Xpress 1000, Xpress 1150 | Integrated: GMA X3000, X3100, X3500 |
| Discrete: 2 GTS, 4 MX 440, 2 Ultra, 2 Ti, 2 Ti 200 | Discrete: 7500 | Integrated: GMA 3000, 3100 |
| Discrete: 256, 2 MX 200, 4 MX 420, 2 MX 400 | Discrete: SDR, LE, DDR, 7000, 7200 | Integrated: GMA 500, 900, 950 |
| Discrete: Nvidia TNT | Discrete: Rage 128 | Discrete: Intel 740 |
Now all that’s left to do is compare performance to your budget, and you'll be able to confidently decide which board is right for you - we even put in the legwork to help find you the best prices!
- Best Graphics Cards for the Money, November Updates
- Best Entry-Level Graphics Cards: $130 and Under
- Best Mid-Range Graphics Cards: $140 to $200
- Best Enthusiast Graphics Cards: $200 to $300
- Best High-End Graphics Cards: $300 to $800
- Best Extreme Graphics Cards: Over $800 and Multi-Card Configurations
- Graphics Card Performance Hierarchy Chart
- Conclusion: Performance Per Dollar
AMD better release the 300 series by January 2015, or they will lose even more money than they already are.
Beat out by Intel and Nvidia now, They'll lose their last legs if they wait 7 months again just like they waited to combat the 780 with the 290/290x.
Have you ever heard of supply and demand? It happens everywhere for the price determination of goods. As long as the demand for venerable cards such as the GTX 780 TI remain unchanged, the price will increase as the supply decreases.
Supply and demand for a card that no longer has a production run doesn't support the idea that their price should rise. There's more than likely to be a shortage than a simple slow down of supply being added. Which means, the card's value is soon to end at that point.
The bump in demand is created by people who already have the card seeing their last chance to SLI.
Supply and demand for a card that no longer has a production run doesn't support the idea that their price should rise. There's more than likely to be a shortage than a simple slow down of supply being added. Which means, the card's value is soon to end at that point.
I believe you understand the supply portion, which is EOL of the card, so supply is dwindling. But I believe you're missing the point that somebody else captured: people still want to buy these older cards. As long as people demand the card, the price will increase up to some equilibrium point.
Honestly they are gonna, and it was slated to be released early december, but they pushed the 960 back because so many people were already buying the more expensive 970/980.
They didn't release it cause their current product was selling too well... AMD is in deep now...
I do find it interesting that people think the power consumption has that much of an effect on overall cost of ownership. 60w even 100w difference (ONLY WHILE GAMING) is going to take a long time to balance out price wise if the AMD is cheaper up front. Thermals on the other hand is irrelevant for me with this card and my case but I could see being more important for others. Anyone agree?
In the end if all was equal cost wise i'd prefer AMD because of the lack of "proprietary" features that Nvidia holds so near and dear. Either way I am MUCH happier spending these amounts of moneysss on video cards rather than $700+ like last year! Cheers and happy gaming
A few different factors here.
First, power costs vary a LOT in different countries. In the USA, yeah it doesn't matter a whole lot. In other countries where electrical bills are much higher, saving 30W or more can slowly add up, especially over months or years. This gets compounded when talking about multi-GPU setups and compute farms.
Second, look at market segment. Power requirements don't mean a lot to the extreme computing crowd. But the mainstream and general enthusiast crowd have to take their existing PSU into consideration when upgrading. Not everyone has a 500W Seasonic unit that can handle any single GPU. You know you can throw a 750 Ti into just about anything, and a 260X should be fairly safe in a lot of systems too, but a 270X may be completely out of the question.
Third, power consumption usually means heat, and heat usually means more fan noise. Not all cooling solutions are created equal, so someone looking for a powerful but quiet PC may err on the lower power consumption side. And you don't need to be a tree hugger to want to save a few watts here and there either.