Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

Graphics Card Performance Hierarchy Chart

Best Graphics Cards For The Money: September 2014
By

What about this other card that’s not on the list? How do I know if it’s a good deal or not?

This will happen. In fact, because inventory levels and prices change quickly, it’s guaranteed to happen. So how do you know if that card you’ve got your eye on is a good buy in its price range?

Here is a resource to help you judge if a card is a good buy or not. The graphics card hierarchy chart groups graphics cards with similar overall performance levels into tiers. The top tier contains the highest-performing cards available, and performance decreases as you go down the tiers from there.

You can use this hierarchy to compare the pricing between two cards, to see which one is a better deal, and also to determine if an upgrade is worthwhile. I don’t recommend upgrading your graphics card unless the replacement card is at least three tiers higher. Otherwise, the upgrade is somewhat parallel, and you may not even notice any worthwhile difference in performance.

At the request of readers, we've added mobile graphics and integrated chipsets to the hierarchy chart. We want to make it clear that there is very little performance data available for these graphics solutions. While the discrete video cards in the chart are placed in tiers based on a lot of information, many of the mobile and integrated devices in the chart are guesstimates based on their specifications. At worst, we doubt they’re more than one tier away from their actual performance, but this is something to keep in mind when considering mobile graphics chipsets.

Graphics Card Hierarchy Chart
GeForceRadeonIntel
Discrete: GTX Titan Z
Discrete: R9 295X2

Discrete: GTX 690Discrete: HD 7990
Discrete: GTX 780 Ti, Titan Black


Discrete: GTX 780, TitanDiscrete: R9 290, 290X
Discrete: GTX 590, 680, 770
Discrete:  HD 6990, 7970 GHz Ed, R9 280X
Discrete: GTX 580, GTX 670, Discrete: HD 5970, 7870 LE (XT), 7950, 280, 285
Discrete: GTX 660 Ti, GTX 760Discrete: HD 7870, R9 270, 270X

Discrete: GTX 295, 480, 570, 660
Go (mobile): 680M
Discrete: HD 4870 X2, 6970, 7850, R7 265,
Mobility: 7970M

Discrete: GTX 470, 560 Ti, 560 Ti 448 Core, 650 Ti Boost, 750 Ti Discrete: HD 4850 X2, 5870, 6950, R7 260X
Mobility: 7950M

Discrete: GTX 560, 650 Ti, 750
Go (mobile): 580M, 675M
Discrete: HD 5850, 6870, 7790
Mobility: 6990M

Discrete: 9800 GX2, 285, 460 256-bit, 465
Discrete: HD 6850, 7770, R7 260
Mobility: 6900M

Discrete: GTX 260, 275, 280, 460 192-bit, 460 SE, 550 Ti, 560 SE, GT 650, GT 740 GDDR5
Go (mobile): 570M, 670M
Discrete: HD 4870, 5770, 4890, 5830, 6770, 6790, 7750 (GDDR5), R7 250 (GDDR5)
Mobility: HD 5870, 6800M

Discrete: 8800 Ultra, 9800 GTX, 9800 GTX+, GTS 250, GTS 450
Go (mobile): 560M, 660M
Discrete: HD 3870 X2, 4850, 5750, 6750, 7750 (DDR3), R7 250 (DDR3)
Mobility: HD 4850, 5850, 7870M

Discrete: 8800 GTX, 8800 GTS 512 MB, GT 545 (GDDR5), GT 730 64-bit GDDR5
Go (mobile): GTX 280M, 285M, 555M (GDDR5)
Discrete: HD 4770
Mobility: HD 4860, 7770M, 7850M

Discrete: 8800 GT 512 MB, 9800 GT, GT 545 (DDR3), GT 640 (DDR3), GT 740 DDR3
Go (mobile): 9800M GTX, GTX 260M (112), GTS 360M (GDDR5), 555M (DDR3)
Discrete: HD 4830, HD 5670, HD 6670 (GDDR5), HD 7730 (GDDR5)
Mobility: HD 5770, HD 5750, 6600M/6700M (GDDR5), 7750M

Discrete: 8800 GTS 640 MB, 9600 GT, GT 240 (GDDR5)
Go (mobile): 9800M GTS, GTX 160M
Discrete: HD 2900 XT, HD 3870, HD 5570 (GDDR5), HD 6570 (GDDR5)
Mobility: 6500M (GDDR5), 6600M/6700M (DDR3), 7730M

Discrete: 8800 GS, 9600 GSO, GT 240 (DDR3)
Go (mobile): GTX 260M (96), GTS 150M, GTS 360M (DDR3)
Discrete: HD 3850 512 MB, HD 4670, HD 5570 (DDR3), HD 6570 (DDR3), HD 6670 (DDR3), HD 7730 (DDR3), R7 240
Mobility: HD 3870, HD 5730, HD 5650, 6500M (DDR3)

Discrete: 8800 GT 256 MB, 8800 GTS 320 MB, GT 440 GDDR5, GT 630 GDDR5, GT 730 128-bit GDDR5
Go (mobile): 8800M
Discrete: HD 2900 PRO, HD 3850 256 MB, 5550 (GDDR5)
Mobility: HD 3850

Discrete: 7950 GX2, GT 440 DDR3, GT 630 DDR3, GT 730 128-bit DDR3
Discrete: X1950 XTX, HD 4650 (DDR3), 5550 (DDR3)
Integrated: HD 7660D

Discrete: 7800 GTX 512, 7900 GTO, 7900 GTX, GT 430, GT 530
Go (mobile): 550M
Discrete: X1900 XT, X1950 XT, X1900 XTX

Discrete: 7800 GTX, 7900 GT, 7950 G, GT 220 (DDR3)
Go (mobile): 525M, 540M
Discrete: X1800 XT, X1900 AIW, X1900 GT, X1950 Pro, HD 2900 GT, HD 5550 (DDR2)
Integrated: HD 7560D

Discrete: 7800 GT, 7900 GS, 8600 GTS, 9500 GT (GDDR3), GT 220 (DDR2)
Go (mobile): 7950 GTX
Discrete: X1800 XL, X1950 GT, HD 4650 (DDR2), HD 6450, R5 230
Mobility: X1800 XT, HD 4650, HD 5165, 6400M
Integrated: HD 6620G, 6550D, 7540D

Discrete: 6800 Ultra, 7600 GT, 7800 GS, 8600 GS, 8600 GT (GDDR3), 9500 GT (DDR2)
Go (mobile): 7800 GTX, 7900 GTX
Discrete: X800 XT (& PE), X850 XT (& PE), X1650 XT, X1800 GTO, HD 2600 XT, HD 3650 (DDR3), HD 3670
Mobility: X1900, 3670
Integrated: 6520G, 6530D, 7480D
Integrated: Intel HD Graphics 4000
Discrete: 6800 GT, 6800 GS (PCIe), 8600 GT (DDR2), GT 520
Go (mobile): 7800, Go 7900 GS, 520M, 520MX
Discrete: X800 XL, X800 GTO2/GTO16, HD 2600 Pro, HD 3650 (DDR2),
Mobility: X800 XT, HD 2600 XT, 3650
Integrated: 6410D, 6480G

Discrete: 6800 GS (AGP)
Go (mobile): 6800 Ultra, 7600 GT, 8600M GT, 8700M GT, 410M
Discrete: X800 GTO 256 MB, X800 PRO, X850 Pro, X1650 GT
Mobility: HD 2600
Integrated: 6370D, 6380G

Discrete: 6800, 7300 GT GDDR3, 7600 GS, 8600M GS
Go (mobile): 6800, 7700
Discrete: X800, X800 GTO 128 MB, X1600 XT, X1650 Pro
Mobility: X1800, HD 5145, HD 5470 (GDDR5)

Discrete: 6600 GT, 6800LE, 6800 XT, 7300 GT (DDR2), 8500 GT, 9400 GT
Go (mobile): 7600 (128-bit)
Discrete: 9800 XT, X700 PRO, X800 GT, X800 SE, X1300 XT, X1600 PRO, HD 2400 XT, HD 4350, HD 4550, HD 5450
Mobility: X800, 3470, HD 5470 (DDR3), HD 5450, HD 5430, 6300M
Integrated: HD 6310, HD 6320
Integrated: Intel HD Graphics 3000
Discrete: FX 5900, FX 5900 Ultra, FX 5950 Ultra, 6600 (128-bit)
Go (mobile): 6800 (128-bit)
Integrated: 9300, 9400
Discrete: 9700, 9700 Pro, 9800, 9800 Pro, X700, X1300 Pro, X1550, HD 2400 Pro
Mobility: X1450, X1600, X1700, 2400 XT, X2500, 3450
Integrated: HD 3200, HD 3300, HD 4200, HD 4250, HD 4290, HD 6250, HD 6290 

Discrete: FX 5800 Ultra, FX 5900 XT
Go (mobile): 6600, Go 7600 (64-bit)
Discrete: 9500 Pro, 9600 XT, 9800 Pro (128-bit), X600 XT, X1050 (128-bit)
Mobility: 9800, X700, X1350, X1400, X2300, HD 2400
Integrated: Intel HD Graphics (Core i5-6x1), 2000
Discrete: 4 Ti 4600, 4 Ti 4800, FX 5700 Ultra, 6200, 8300, 8400 G, G 210, G 310
Go (mobile): 315M
Discrete: 9600 PRO, 9800 LE, X600 PRO, HD 2300
Mobility: 9700 (128-bit), X600, X1300
Integrated: Xpress 1250
Integrated: Intel HD Graphics (Core i3 5x0, Core i5-6x0)
Discrete: 4 Ti4200, 4 Ti4400, 4 Ti4800 SE, FX 5600 Ultra, FX 5700, 6600 (64-bit), 7300 GS, 8400M GS, 9300M G, 9300M GS Discrete: 9500, 9550, 9600, X300, X1050 (64-bit)
Mobility: 9600
Integrated: Intel HD Graphics (Pentium G)
Discrete: 3 Ti500, FX 5200 Ultra, FX 5600, FX 5700 LE, 6200 TC, 6600 LE, 7200 GS, 7300 LE
Go (mobile): 5700, 8200M, 9200M GS, 9100
Integrated: 8200, 8300
Discrete: 8500, 9100, 9000 PRO, 9600 LE, X300 SE, X1150
Mobility 9700 (64-bit)
Integrated: GMA X4500
Discrete: 3, 3 Ti200, FX 5200 (128-bit), FX 5500,
Go (mobile): 5600, 6200, 6400, 7200, 7300, 7400 (64-bit)
Discrete: 9000, 9200, 9250
Mobility: 9600 (64-bit), X300

Discrete: FX 5200 (64 bit)
Go (mobile): 7200, 7400 (32-bit)
Integrated: 6100, 6150, 7025, 7050
Discrete: 9200 SE
Integrated: Xpress 200M, Xpress 1000, Xpress 1150
Integrated: GMA X3000, X3100, X3500
Discrete: 2 GTS, 4 MX 440, 2 Ultra, 2 Ti, 2 Ti 200 Discrete: 7500 Integrated: GMA 3000, 3100
Discrete: 256, 2 MX 200, 4 MX 420, 2 MX 400 Discrete: SDR, LE, DDR, 7000, 7200 Integrated: GMA 500, 900, 950
Discrete: Nvidia TNT Discrete: Rage 128 Discrete: Intel 740

Now all that’s left to do is compare performance to your budget, and you'll be able to confidently decide which board is right for you - we even put in the legwork to help find you the best prices!

Add a comment
Ask a Category Expert
React To This Article

Create a new thread in the Reviews comments forum about this subject

Example: Notebook, Android, SSD hard drive

Display all 36 comments.
  • 0 Hide
    adamovera , September 14, 2014 9:31 PM
    Archived comments are found here: http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/id-2250433/graphics-cards-money-january-2012.html
  • 6 Hide
    crisan_tiberiu , September 14, 2014 9:49 PM
    AMD rules the charts :) 
  • 2 Hide
    blackmagnum , September 14, 2014 9:52 PM
    Please update Intel graphics. They can also game, you know.
  • 0 Hide
    Marius_Bota , September 14, 2014 10:19 PM
    Because TitanZ is included in the hierarchy chat, please include it in the performance/dollar chart for us to make an impression on card's performance.
  • 0 Hide
    kamhagh , September 14, 2014 11:07 PM
    a little tip, never ever ever ever get AMD for Linux :) 
  • 2 Hide
    Nuckles_56 , September 15, 2014 12:00 AM
    "The GeForce GT 750, 740 GDDR5, and 730 DDR3 shed $5 each to $15, $95, and $65."
    Where can I get these $15 gtx 750's?

    [EDIT by Cleeve]
    Derp! Fixed to $65 :p 
    [/EDIT]
  • 4 Hide
    Nuckles_56 , September 15, 2014 12:04 AM
    Also, why does the r9 290x need a 500W PSU and the GTX 780ti need a 600W one when the 780ti uses less power?
  • 0 Hide
    toms my babys daddy , September 15, 2014 12:18 AM
    is this just a repost of last month? the link was already purple for me. lol

    [EDIT by Cleeve]
    Not a repost. We simply re-use the same URL so people don't have to change links to the article. :) 
    [/EDIT]
  • 0 Hide
    qlum , September 15, 2014 12:35 AM

    Quote:
    a little tip, never ever ever ever get AMD for Linux :) 


    I can second that for gaming at least. However hardware acceleration in video is pretty great still under the open source drivers. My e350 still works perfectly at 1080p in about any format using those.

    I really which and got its shot together on the Linux driver front though.
  • 6 Hide
    chaosmassive , September 15, 2014 12:38 AM
    in the hierarchy chart if new card added in the list
    can you make a bold font of it
    to highlight that new card has been added it
    to ease people look up on the list since so many card in one column

    this is just a suggestion though...thx
  • -1 Hide
    cd000 , September 15, 2014 5:05 AM
    Quote:
    AMD rules the charts :) 


    Yep, AMD did it again!
  • 1 Hide
    InvalidError , September 15, 2014 5:25 AM
    Quote:
    is this just a repost of last month? the link was already purple for me. lol

    For quarterly roundups, they simply update the existing article and re-post it instead of creating a new article from a template and a new forum thread - see how this thread's title still says January 2012?

    Many people, myself included, find this quite annoying since it makes it impossible to go back to past versions to compare them against each other for things like tracking how recommendations progressed over time unless you archive them for yourself.
  • 0 Hide
    InvalidError , September 15, 2014 5:39 AM
    Quote:
    Please update Intel graphics. They can also game, you know.

    Not very well though.

    But yeah, Haswell's HD4600 is up to 50% faster than Ivy's HD4000 and that should be enough to earn it a spot a few tiers higher, which should be noteworthy since it rules out some of the lowest-end and more ancient GPUs as viable "upgrades."
  • 0 Hide
    sincreator , September 15, 2014 5:59 AM
    This will be the third article in a row that I pose the same question. Why in the multi card section do you mention the 290 crossfire only from AMD? Is 2 x r9 280 for $400 not a good deal? What about 2 x r9 280x for $550? There are a lot of people out there that would possibly consider adding an extra one of these cards. That is the reason for that section right? So why recommend pretty much all Nvidia's SLI solutions, but only mention the r9 290 from AMD's side for crossfire?
  • 1 Hide
    hippenmoor , September 15, 2014 6:59 AM
    Several of the "gaming" laptops on the market are using the GeForce GT 750M. Could you add it to the hierarchy chart so we can see where it falls?
  • 0 Hide
    DrNLS , September 15, 2014 7:04 AM
    Guru Meditation #00000025.65045048
    You lost the GTX670 in the Hierarchy Chart. Press left mouse button to continue.
  • 0 Hide
    InvalidError , September 15, 2014 7:09 AM
    Quote:
    So why recommend pretty much all Nvidia's SLI solutions, but only mention the r9 290 from AMD's side for crossfire?

    Because AMD's GPUs still have too many unresolved crossfire performance consistency issues so people buying from scratch are more likely to get an enjoyable playing experience out of a 290X than 2x280 for about the same price?
  • 0 Hide
    sincreator , September 15, 2014 7:24 AM
    Quote:
    Quote:
    So why recommend pretty much all Nvidia's SLI solutions, but only mention the r9 290 from AMD's side for crossfire?

    Because AMD's GPUs still have too many unresolved crossfire performance consistency issues so people buying from scratch are more likely to get an enjoyable playing experience out of a 290X than 2x280 for about the same price?


    What unresolved issues? Frame pacing was the big one, but that's fixed now afaik. So why mention the 290 xfire then? So you would recommend that someone that allready has a r9 280x to sell it and spend another $500+ on a single GPU card instead of picking up a second card. That is the main reason for the mutiple graphics section, is it not?

  • 0 Hide
    InvalidError , September 15, 2014 7:45 AM
    Quote:
    So you would recommend that someone that allready has a r9 280x to sell it and spend another $500+ on a single GPU card instead of picking up a second card. That is the main reason for the mutiple graphics section, is it not?

    That's why I specified FROM SCRATCH - no existing GPU to start with.

    Once you are invested in one particular GPU and do not want to give it up, your upgrade path is already set regardless of where your existing GPU stands on the bang-per-buck chart.
  • 1 Hide
    cleeve , September 15, 2014 7:54 AM
    Quote:
    This will be the third article in a row that I pose the same question. Why in the multi card section do you mention the 290 crossfire only from AMD? Is 2 x r9 280 for $400 not a good deal? What about 2 x r9 280x for $550? There are a lot of people out there that would possibly consider adding an extra one of these cards. That is the reason for that section right? So why recommend pretty much all Nvidia's SLI solutions, but only mention the r9 290 from AMD's side for crossfire?


    Sorry, I didn't notice this question before.

    I do this because AMD cards scale very poorly, until the Hawaii GCN update.

    Nvidia had frame pacing hardware built into their GPUs from some time, but Tahiti generation GCN parts have latency problems in multi-card configs. This is fixed in the bridge-free Hawaii (and presumably Tonga, although we haven't tested it yet) Crossfire configs.

    Hope that answers your question,

    - Don (Cleeve)

Display more comments
React To This Article