Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

Best Graphics Cards For The Money: November 2010

Best Graphics Cards For The Money: November 2010
By

Detailed graphics card specifications and reviews are great—that is, if you have the time to do the research. But at the end of the day, what a gamer needs is the best graphics card within a certain budget.

So, if you don’t have the time to research the benchmarks, or if you don’t feel confident enough in your ability to pick the right card, then fear not. We at Tom’s Hardware have come to your aid with a simple list of the best gaming cards offered for the money.

November Updates:

October was an exciting month for graphics hardware. The big news, of course, was the introduction of AMD's Radeon 6870 and 6850. Here is the bottom line: the Radeon HD 6850 is almost as fast as the GeForce GTX 460 1 GB, and the Radeon HD 6870 is almost as fast as the GeForce GTX 470.

The MSRP of the new Radeon HD 6850 and 6870--$180 and $240 respectively--is lower than the street price of GeForce competition prior to launch. However, Nvidia made a successful counterattack by lowering the street price of its GeForce GTX 460 1GB and 470, which can now be found as low as $190 and $250, respectively. This is a big deal for value-conscious gamers, who only weeks ago had to pay ~$230 for the GeForce GTX 460 and ~$300 for the GeForce GTX 470. All of these cards, Radeon and GeForce alike, are excellent buys at the new prices.

What are the finer points of AMD's next-generation graphics cards? Perhaps most surprisingly, they're slower than their similarly-named predecessors. So, if you missed the launch story and own a Radeon HD 5850, the 6850 isn't going to be an upgrade for you. The same goes for the 5870/6870.

Beyond that, the Radeon HD 6000-series introduces Blu-ray 3D playback support and the framework for a stereoscopic gaming ecosystem, though AMD's effort remains very premature in the PC space. The HD3D initiative is generic and supports the stereo over HDMI 1.4a. As a result, AMD has no Radeon-specific 3D displays or glasses technology to bring to market. The downside is a reliance on other vendors, and as of now, the only HDMI 1.4-equipped monitor is exclusive to Europe. For the time being (in North America, at least) the only way for consumers to use the new Radeons in 3D mode is with a compatible television that already has its own bundled glasses. 

The new Radeon cards also boast a new method of anti-aliasing called morphological AA that produces results similar to super-sampling, but with very little performance overhead using a post-process compute shader. Though this seemed a bit buggy at launch, the company recently uploaded a new driver to help address intermittent issues with the technique. AMD also let us know that it will be following the Radeon HD 6800-series soon with a high-end Radeon HD 6900 lineup that will replace the Radeon HD 5870 and 5970.

Of course, Nvidia didn't sit by and watch the action. It released the new GeForce GT 430 earlier in October. With performance below the Radeon HD 5570 DDR3, this card wasn't designed to win any speed races. Instead, it's intended as an entry-level HTPC board capable of Blu-ray 3D playback and HD audio bitstreaming over HDMI. This card can be found for as low as $70 online and is the only half-height option with this unique combination of features (although there are other options in that price range, if either of those features aren't necessary for your application). You can read more about the GeForce GT 430 in our launch review.

Aside from its entry-level GeForce card, Nvidia also released 3DTV Play, a feature that allows any GeForce card armed with an HDMI 1.4 output to transmit stereo content to displays that support 3D over the HDMI 1.4 standard. This means that GeForce cards can compete with the new Radeon HD 6000-series when it comes to playing back 3D on consumer televisions, while Nvidia's 3D Vision maintains a clear advantage when it comes to PC monitors and projectors with quite a few models specifically able to handle the company's proprietary 3D Vision standard. The market will likely provide AMD owners with increasing numbers of compatible 3D monitors and projectors in the future. But in the meantime, 3D Vision is the only prolific option for these display types.

What does the near future hold? As we've mentioned, AMD made no secret that the upcoming Radeon HD 6900s will arrive before the end of the year. Common sense suggests that Nvidia has something up its sleeve with which to combat the new high-end Radeon lineup. Keep your eyes peeled for that.

Some Notes About Our Recommendations

A few simple guidelines to keep in mind when reading this list:

  • This list is for gamers who want to get the most for their money. If you don’t play games, then the cards on this list are more expensive than what you really need. We've added a reference page at the end of the column covering integrated graphics processors, which is likely more apropos.
  • The criteria to get on this list are strictly price/performance. We acknowledge that recommendations for multiple video cards, such as two Radeon cards in CrossFire mode or two GeForce cards in SLI, typically require a motherboard that supports CrossFire or SLI and a chassis with more space to install multiple graphics cards. They also require a beefier power supply compared to what a single card needs, and will almost certainly produce more heat than a single card. Keep these factors in mind when making your purchasing decision. In most cases, if we have recommended a multiple-card solution, we try to recommend a single-card honorable mention at a comparable price point for those who find multi-card setups undesirable.
  • Prices and availability change on a daily basis. We can’t base our decisions on always-changing pricing information, but we can list some good cards that you probably won’t regret buying at the price ranges we suggest, along with real-time prices from our PriceGrabber engine, for your reference.
  • The list is based on some of the best U.S. prices from online retailers. In other countries or at retail stores, your mileage will most certainly vary.
  • These are new card prices. No used or open-box cards are in the list; they might represent a good deal, but it’s outside the scope of what we’re trying to do.
Display 173 Comments.
This thread is closed for comments
Top Comments
  • 21 Hide
    wildeast , November 4, 2010 4:16 AM
    wow, about 5 ties, great competition :) 
  • 21 Hide
    iamtheking123 , November 4, 2010 5:39 AM
    stm1185The factory overclocked GTX460s are the true value champions. The $220 Evga FTW easily outpacing the 6870 in most games and providing better scaling in a dual card setup.


    Sorry, but no. The overclocked 460 might be on par with a 5850, but a 6870 is right about equivalent to a (non-existent) 5860. And since you can undoubtedly get great overclocks by yourself on the 6870, it would easily outpace the 460.

    PS - Buying factory overclocked cards is a waste of money. You spend $20-$40 more for a card that has overclocks easily reached without much effort if you did it yourself.
  • 15 Hide
    shreeharsha , November 4, 2010 5:21 AM
    My dream refreshes every month with your "Best Graphics Cards For The Money" .... but still dreaming of purchasing one. ($$$$$$)
Other Comments
  • 12 Hide
    rohitbaran , November 4, 2010 4:11 AM
    The list has really become crowded now. BTW, Radeon 5870 is still better value than GTX480 at their current prices. Waiting for the Cayman series, when the 5870 will finally be replaced.
  • 14 Hide
    anacandor , November 4, 2010 4:15 AM
    A quality read as usual.
  • 21 Hide
    wildeast , November 4, 2010 4:16 AM
    wow, about 5 ties, great competition :) 
  • -5 Hide
    dogman_1234 , November 4, 2010 4:24 AM
    Can't wait until AMD and nVIDIA release their new chipsets this end of the year!

    Nice. To me it is de-ja-vue, but then...AMD did release an impressive 6xxx series to tackle nVIDIA.
  • -7 Hide
    anacandor , November 4, 2010 4:24 AM
    Quote:
    So, if you missed the launch story and own a Radeon HD 5850, the 6850 isn't going to be an upgrade for you. The same goes for the 5870/6870.


    Implying that the 68xx series was even intended to replace the 58xx cards....
  • 0 Hide
    jjb8675309 , November 4, 2010 4:27 AM
    well all of this will change once 6900 series comes out as everyone already knows, we will see how the 6900 series and whatever nvidia has up their sleeves fair in the month to come before upgrading from a 5770, my gut instinct is to go with a single gtx 470 or 6870 and crossfire, however who knows what the coming months will bring and it is too early to jump on the midrange 6800 series bandwagon imo, if they do still offer great price/performance when the rest of amd and nvidias series comes out then i will make a decision at that point. Good read

    Also anyone know if the 5850 and 5870 will drop significantly? both of those cards would be great with a reduced pricetag
  • 11 Hide
    nativeson8803 , November 4, 2010 4:56 AM
    I look forward to this article every month!
  • 1 Hide
    cleeve , November 4, 2010 5:07 AM
    anacandorImplying that the 68xx series was even intended to replace the 58xx cards....


    No, explaining to people who would naturally assume that a 6870>5870 that this isn't the case, so don't waste your money. ;) 
  • 15 Hide
    shreeharsha , November 4, 2010 5:21 AM
    My dream refreshes every month with your "Best Graphics Cards For The Money" .... but still dreaming of purchasing one. ($$$$$$)
  • -8 Hide
    stm1185 , November 4, 2010 5:33 AM
    The factory overclocked GTX460s are the true value champions. The $220 Evga FTW easily outpacing the 6870 in most games and providing better scaling in a dual card setup.

  • 21 Hide
    iamtheking123 , November 4, 2010 5:39 AM
    stm1185The factory overclocked GTX460s are the true value champions. The $220 Evga FTW easily outpacing the 6870 in most games and providing better scaling in a dual card setup.


    Sorry, but no. The overclocked 460 might be on par with a 5850, but a 6870 is right about equivalent to a (non-existent) 5860. And since you can undoubtedly get great overclocks by yourself on the 6870, it would easily outpace the 460.

    PS - Buying factory overclocked cards is a waste of money. You spend $20-$40 more for a card that has overclocks easily reached without much effort if you did it yourself.
  • 2 Hide
    killerchickens , November 4, 2010 5:45 AM
    Why is the HD 4850 X2 in the same tier as th 5870 and not the 5850.
  • -4 Hide
    yyk71200 , November 4, 2010 6:01 AM
    Is this just coincidence that AMD decided to name the high midrange cards 68XX while dropping ATI naming? Maybe they felt that since these are no longer ATI cards they can change the naming scheme?
  • -4 Hide
    Anonymous , November 4, 2010 6:15 AM
    GTX 470, let alone GTX 470 SLI was recommended? What?

    I know its price dropped to competitive levels, but when you can get the 6870, why would you want a power hungry, loud and hot (not in a good way) solution?
  • -4 Hide
    beavermml , November 4, 2010 6:26 AM
    so to me.. which are the best option.. buy a gtx460/6850 or another 4870 for xfire?
  • 11 Hide
    mitch074 , November 4, 2010 6:56 AM
    Radeon 4850: when did it come out, again? June 2008, no? That makes it the granddaddy of all current cards...

    "Who's your daddy? Why yes, I am!"
  • 3 Hide
    rutoojinn , November 4, 2010 7:14 AM
    Before the ATi 68xx series came it I was wondering why ATi wouldn't lower their prices of the 58xx series. Man the 6870 is a great card. For the entry level price it is great. 240 might be too much for some but its perfect IMO for that card. Ordering an MSI one off Amazon when I can save up for one.
  • -7 Hide
    rottingsheep , November 4, 2010 7:16 AM
    is 4870x2 on par with gtx295? i don;t think so
  • -9 Hide
    rottingsheep , November 4, 2010 7:19 AM
    5770 is very close to 4870, 2x5770 is almost the same as 1 5870 and as i recall, gtx295 is way faster than 5870.
  • -3 Hide
    Phoenixlight , November 4, 2010 7:21 AM
    Can you please stop using 1920x1200 as a screen resolution comparison point? The industry has gone with 1920x1080 so all you're doing is confusing people and making them think that they've got an inferior monitor.
Display more comments