Benchmark Results: Productivity

+1 for making this statement, glad someone considered it at least. All in all decent build for the money.

I'll be honest, I think a $450 budget is a little more reasonable than a $400 budget. At that price a 5750 or even a 5770 can be had, which would have worked fine with all of the other parts and likely would have matched the $550 June build.

Even this $400 build packs a punch, you can get one HELL of a rig for the money any more. It really is insane, and that's not even considering the used or refurb market!

Awesome article, probably one of my favorite SBM, atleast the best I've seen in a long time.

very nice build, interesting to see how much performance can be squeezed out of the budget. i was expecting worse results.

Conclusion ?

150$ buys you a lot better gaming capabilities, and nothing else.

I doubt someone spending $400 can't afford to add an extra dollar. although i realize that the point in these articles is to stay under the budget, it would have been interesting to see the price/perforamce difference.

nice case, looks very good ... pity that rosewill does not have a downloadable manual for it ...

I'd be interested to know how much more overclocking headroom you could pull out of it if you left it at 3 cores - and would that net you more performance in most of the benchmarks?

I'd bet if you could pull ~200 mhz more out of it, it would begin to match up with the missing core, and maybe start to pull away around 400mhz.

The Cooler Master Elite 460 is a falsely labeled piece of crap. You can find the review (with proper testing) here: http://www.hardwaresecrets.com/article/1005/1

You'll have to spend a little bit more there. Rosewill has a 430W (RG430 S12) unit or the Antec Neo 400W is almost the same price as the CM after a discount and rebate.

Clicked once but got a double post somehow.

What do the best price/performance we can have?

Really good job. I also like the fact you pointed out that it doesn't include combo discounts, shell shockers or MIR.

That tells me that it could of been an even better system for the same price. I understand that you couldn't, but it's a real eye opener for us folks in the System forum.

I consider this to be a perfect benchmark system for the low budget build requests there.

While I agree with Proximon on the PSU, I also think this was an outstanding benchmark build. It's also clear where the next $50-$100 could go to improve it. Very nicely done.

There really are cheaper cases and motherboards out there that would work just fine with this setup. The extra money could go to where it's really need: the graphics.

This is the most skillfully built SBM PC I've seen in a long time. Great job.

No. But you might try to install your upgrade copy of XP anyways. It's been forever since I've done it, but it gives you an option to input the cd-key for an upgrade installation instead of an os upgrade installation. I'm just not certain if it requires a me/2000 key instead of the 98 key.

Next time, put this kind of question in the proper forum, not some random article comment thread.

I installed an upgrade disk XP once and I think its asks you to insert the disk of the OS you want to upgrade. XP then checks the disk I guess to see if its an allowed upgrade.

This was a great review. I would have when for a $450 range build with a 5770 and an X3 and got the mobo in the review. I would have gotten the $20 Gigabyte gz-ph1a3 and Antec 430W for $40. May have exceeded the price but would have been a great system.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6811233061
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6817371023

Thanks, yes felt it was worth mentioning this one wasn’t as tuned as other recent SBM budget builds. The 2140 MHz CPU-NB Frequency for this $400 OC is quite low versus 2540 MHz for the June $550 PC, and 2620 MHz for the March $750 build. I aim for 2400-2600 MHz CPU-NB, although realize many overclockers utilizing better cooling are willing to push this far higher.

This lil’ box had a few strikes against it that (I felt) didn’t warrant the additional tuning time. The mobo’s design & tame passive cooling, the lack of CPU-NB Voltage control in BIOS, and the fact the boxed cooler’s abilities were already being taxed without increasing the memory controller and L3 cache frequency.

I'd have rather seen a $500 system. ~$100 more into gfx would have been well spent. Maybe a better HSF too.

Agreed, kudos to the community for asking for this and kudos to Paul for making it happen, $400.00 seems to pack a decent punch!