Best offers

Dell Home GeForce GTX 295 Video Card (1.75GB,... $539.99 Dell Home More info
Dell Home GeForce GTX 260 Video Card (896MB,... $229.99 Dell Home More info
Newegg.com Radeon HD 5770 Video Card (1GB,... $169.99 Newegg.com More info
STAPLES GeForce GTX 260 Video Card (896MB,... $229.99 STAPLES More info
Best Buy GeForce GTX 285 Video Card (1GB,... $279.99 Best Buy More info
All about Graphics Cards
 Latest Graphics Cards articles
All Graphics Cards articles

Newsletters


Ok !
  • Ask your question about IT issues
  • Post

Partners

The Games selection

violent : More Mindless Violence Basic shooting game, but still so powerful! Use the mouse to take aim and shoot at the little beasties before they get to you. Use Space to reload....
crazy : Interactive Boogy Pick one of the 3 songs, hit on the correct keys matching this boy's dance moves.
Ads

Sponsored links

The Gigabyte GV-N250ZL-1GI: Software And Cooling

Previous Next
2:00 AM - 04/20/2009 by Don Woligroski

The most striking feature of the card is, of course, its large Zalman cooler, as its four heatpipe design is elegant, simple, and typical of a Zalman product. The cooler is a Zalman VF1050, which is a newer version of the tried-and-true VF1000. Buying a Zalman VF1000 alone would set you back $45 on Newegg, so there’s undeniable value with this cooler being part of the GV-N250ZL-1GI package. A low-cost reference GeForce GTS 250 and a Zalman VF 1000 cooler would add up to more than what the Gigabyte card costs.



It’s notable that there is absolutely no cooling applied to the card’s memory, although memory cooling is often a gimmick. While the card takes up two slots, it doesn’t have a vent at the rear of the case, so the hot air from the card's components is deposited back in the case, similar to Asus' EAH4850 MT air-flow design. Unlike the Asus card, however, the Gigabyte cooler is not a "hybrid" unit, so the cooler is always on, although the Zalman fan is so quiet that it’s not really an issue.

Once again, our pre-release sample didn’t include a retail box or software bundle. From promotional shots of the card, we see it will be shipped with a Molex-to-PCIe converter cable, a DVI-to-HDMI dongle, and an audio cable to channel sound from a sound card to the HDMI output, if desired. Remember that sound over HDMI isn’t natively supported in the GeForce GTS 250 cards, so this is a workaround. Notably missing is an SLI connector and component video dongle, which are things we would expect in a top-tier version of a GeForce GTS 250. Also included is a manual and a driver/utility CD. Gigabyte’s Gamer HUD Lite utility will be on this CD as well, although it can be downloaded from the Gigabyte site if need be.

This is a simple overclocking utility that, when accompanied with a Gigabyte card that has the option of voltage control, can be a force to reckon with. Unfortunately, unlike Gigabyte’s GeForce 9800 GT, the GV-N250ZL-1GI has no voltage control ability, and voltage controls will be missing from the Gamer HUD control panel when used with the GV-N250ZL-1GI. Hence, the "Lite" designation.

Presumably, Gigabyte feels that the Ultra Durable VGA feature will be enough to let the card stretch its legs and be a serious overclocking contender. We’re a little disappointed because we wanted to pit one voltage-tweakable card against another, but we’ll see if Gigabyte’s card has what it takes to stand against Asus’ EAH4850 Matrix later when it comes times for overclocking.

For now, we’ll consider that even the restricted version of Gigabyte’s Gamer HUD Lite application offers everything an overclocker really needs with no interface confusion.

The Gamer HUD Lite utility really has only three settings to change: GPU, shader, and memory clock speeds. You can also enable "2D/3D Auto-Optimized," but from what we saw, it didn’t really do any overclocking at that setting. There is also a handy temperature and GPU usage graph. That’s it! Clean and simple.

Armed with these two unique cards and their proprietary overclocking tools, let’s see how far we can take them.

Topics being discussed on the forums
Talkback
rags_20 04/20/2009 9:02 AM
Hide
-0+

In the second picture of the 4850, the card can be seen bent due to the weight.

rags_20 04/20/2009 9:44 AM
Hide
-0+

The Gigabyte would be more effective with 2 fans.

tuannguyen 04/20/2009 10:02 AM
Hide
-3+

rags_20 :
In the second picture of the 4850, the card can be seen bent due to the weight.



Hi rags_20 -

Actually, the appearance of the card in that picture is caused by barrel or pincushion distortion of the lens used to take the photo. The card itself isn't bent.

/ Tuan

demonhorde665 04/20/2009 12:10 PM
Show
demonhorde665 04/20/2009 12:16 PM
Show
demonhorde665 04/20/2009 12:25 PM
Show
jebusv20 04/20/2009 1:00 PM
Hide
-5+

demonhorde665... try not to triple post.
looks bad... and eratic. and makes the forums/coments system
more clutered than need be.

ps. your not running the same bench markes as Toms so your not really comparable.
yes, same game and engine, but for example in crysis, the frame rates are completely different from the start, through to the snowey bit at the end.

pps. are you comparing your card to there card at the same resolution?

alexcuria 04/20/2009 1:37 PM
Hide
-2+

Hi,

I've been looking for a comparison like this for several weeks. Thank you although it didn't help me too much in my decision. I also missed some comments regarding the Physix, Cuda, DirectX 10 or 10.1 and Havok discussion.

I would be very happy to read a review for the Gainward HD4850 Golden Sample "Goes Like Hell" with the faster GDDR5 memory. If it then CLEARLY takes the lead over the GTS 250 and gets even closer to the HD4870 then my decision will be easy. Less heat, less consumption and almost same performance than a stock 4870. Enough for me.

btw. Resolutions I'm most interested in: 1440x900 and 1650x1080 for 20" monitor.

Thank you

spanner_razor 04/20/2009 3:55 PM
Hide
--1+

Under the test setup section the cpu is listed as core 2 duo q6600, should it not be listed as a quad? Feel free to delete this comment if it is wrong or when you fix the erratum.

KyleSTL 04/20/2009 5:11 PM
Hide
-4+

Why a Q6600/750i setup? That is certainly less than ideal. A Q9550/P45 or 920/X58 would have been a better choice in my opinion (and may have exhibited a greater difference between the cards).

zipzoomflyhigh 04/20/2009 5:12 PM
Hide
-0+

I have the MSI HD4850 and mine has almost the same identicle cooler as that GTS250, AND it also blows the air OUT the back of the case, unlike either of these cards. Mine also clocks to 690 core (625 stock) and never goes above 55c when gaming. I paid $134.
My MSI HD4850 would clearly come out the winner here.

zipzoomflyhigh 04/20/2009 5:13 PM
Show
zipzoomflyhigh 04/20/2009 5:19 PM
Hide
--3+

Im stumped by KyleSTL's assumption that a faster processor and different chipset would make a difference in the testing. Neither of those cards would be bottlenecked by a Q6600 so it would make no difference.

B-Unit 04/20/2009 5:21 PM
Hide
-6+

zipzoomflyhigh :
and no the Q6600 is classified as a C2D. Its two E6600's crammed on one die.



No, its classified as a C2Q. E6600 is classified as C2D.

KyleSTL 04/20/2009 5:34 PM
Hide
-3+

ZZFhigh,

Directly from the article on page 11:

Quote :Game Benchmarks: Left 4 Dead
Let’s move on to a game where we can crank up the eye candy, even at 1920x1200. At maximum detail, can we see any advantage to either card?

Nothing to see here, though given the results in our original GeForce GTS 250 review, this is likely a result of our Core 2 Quad processor holding back performance.

Clearly this is not an ideal setup to eliminate the processor from affecting benchmark results of the two cards. Most games are not multithreaded, so the 2.4Ghz clock of the Q6600 will undoubtedly hold back a lot of games since they will not be able to utilize all 4 cores.

To all,

Stop triple posting!

weakerthans4 04/20/2009 5:36 PM
Hide
-3+

Quote :The default clock speeds for the Gigabyte GV-N250ZL-1GI are 738 MHz on the GPU, 1,836 MHz on the shaders, and 2,200 MHz on the memory. Once again, these are exactly the same as the reference GeForce GTS 250 speeds.


Later in the article you write,
Quote :or the sake of argument, let’s say most cards can make it to 800 MHz, which is a 62 MHz overclock. So, for Gigabyte’s claim of a 10% overclocking increase, we’ll say that most GV-N250ZL-1GI cards should be able to get to at least 806.2 MHz on the GPU. Hey, let’s round it up to 807 MHz to keep things clean. Did the GV-N250ZL-1GI beat the spread? It sure did. With absolutely no modifications except to raw clock speeds, our sample GV-N250ZL-1GI made it to 815 MHz rock-solid stable. That’s a 20% increase over an "expected" overclock according to our unscientific calculation.


Your math is wrong. A claim of 20% over clock on the GV-N250ZL-1GI would equal 885.6 MHz. 10% of 738MHz = 73.8 MHz. So a 10% overclock would equal 811.8 MHz. 815 MHz is nowhere near 20%. In fact, according to your numbers, the GV-N250ZL-1GI barely lives up to its 10% minimal capability.

dimaf1985 04/20/2009 6:53 PM
Hide
-1+

This whole article is completely invalid and the results are skewed because, as was documented on tweaktown, Catalyst 9.3 performance is much lower compared to 9.2. Catalyst 9.4 reclaims some of those performance losses, but 9.2 is still a bit better, if you compare the two analyses. Redo these tests with 9.2 drivers.

universalremonster 04/20/2009 7:07 PM
Hide
-1+

weakerthans4 :
Later in the article you write,Your math is wrong. A claim of 20% over clock on the GV-N250ZL-1GI would equal 885.6 MHz. 10% of 738MHz = 73.8 MHz. So a 10% overclock would equal 811.8 MHz. 815 MHz is nowhere near 20%. In fact, according to your numbers, the GV-N250ZL-1GI barely lives up to its 10% minimal capability.



No what he is saying is this- Gigabyte claims that the extra copper in the PCB will allow for a 10%-30% further increase compared to how much a standard cards speed can be raised by overclocking. So saying that a standard card oc's to 800MHz which is a 62MHz increase, Gigabyte is claiming a 6.2 (10%) to 18.6 (30%) MHz further increase on top of that. So "technically" a 20% increase would have put it at 816.4 MHz, only 1.4MHz more than the 815MHz he acheived.

Dax Corrin 04/20/2009 7:12 PM
Hide
-17+

Time to ban DemonHorde 665, the abuse of the English language is making all dead spelling teachers spin in their graves.

universalremonster 04/20/2009 7:12 PM
Hide
-3+

personally I think it's the Zalman accounting for a bulk of the 20% extra and not the couple ounces of copper. That cooler rocks.


Comments are closed on this page.

Sponsored links

Related forums topics

Related news

Related articles