Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

Ready For The Numbers?

Nvidia GeForce GTX Titan 6 GB: GK110 On A Gaming Card
By

Nobody likes a tease. Unfortunately, Nvidia is asking that GeForce GTX Titan’s benchmark results remain confidential for another couple of days. We’re naturally using that time to generate as much data as possible: comparisons against GeForce GTX 680, GeForce GTX 690, and Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition; two-way and three-way SLI configurations to pit against 690s in four-way SLI; power consumption; heat; noise; and of course, compute performance. Even when we are able to publish the outcome of our testing, GeForce GTX Titan won't be available for you to buy. The company says to expect availability the week of February 25.

Given the numbers we’ve already run using earlier drivers, along with the information presented today, what can we say about Nvidia’s GeForce GTX Titan? I’ve actually seen enough to draw my conclusions; the upcoming data dump is only going to serve to support my opinion.

Enthusiasts shopping for ultra-high-end cards like this one know they’re not going to get a good deal. Two GeForce GTX 680s sell for about $920. Better still, two Radeon HD 7970s (which are faster) can be had for $800. And as you slide down the scale, every dollar spent tends to stretch further. That’s not what the GeForce GTX Titan is about, though.

Titan: At home in big, beefy gaming PCs and mini-ITX enclosuresTitan: At home in big, beefy gaming PCs and mini-ITX enclosures

Rather, this thing incorporates a GPU currently found in the Tesla K20X (which HP will sell you for $7,700), a cooler clearly derived from the marquee GeForce GTX 690, and a staggering 6 GB of GDDR5 memory. As you’ll soon see, the combination generally falls between a GeForce GTX 690 and Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition in our benchmarks. That means:

  1. Pay the same $1,000 for a GeForce GTX 690 if you only want one dual-slot card and your case accommodates the long board. It remains the fastest graphics solution we’ve ever tested, so there's no real reason not to favor it over Titan.
  2. The Titan isn’t worth $600 more than a Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition. Two of AMD’s cards are going to be faster and cost less. Of course, they’re also distractingly loud when you hit them with a demanding load. Make sure you have room for two dual-slot cards with one vacant space between them. Typically, I frown on such inelegance, but more speed for $200 less could be worth the trade-off in a roomy case.
  3. Buy a GeForce GTX Titan when you want the fastest gaming experience possible from a mini-ITX machine like Falcon Northwest’s Tiki or iBuyPower’s Revolt. A 690 isn’t practical due to its length, power requirements, and axial-flow fan.
  4. Buy a GeForce GTX Titan if you have a trio of 1920x1080/2560x1440/2560x1600 screens and fully intend to use two or three cards in SLI. In the most demanding titles, two GK110s scale much more linearly than four GK104s (dual GeForce GTX 690s). Three Titan cards are just Ludicrous Gibs!

We appreciate Nvidia’s continued attention to acoustics. We’re glad to see the GeForce GTX Titan exhausting all of its hot air. And as you’ll see in a couple of days, there’s a lot to like about this card’s performance. Our beef is with its stratospheric price tag, which limits the Titan to small form factor gaming boxes and multi-card configurations in ultra-high-end PCs. Most enthusiasts will rightly balk at this card. But if you’re in its target demographic, the GeForce GTX Titan is essentially unrivaled.

Ask a Category Expert

Create a new thread in the Reviews comments forum about this subject

Example: Notebook, Android, SSD hard drive

Display all 121 comments.
This thread is closed for comments
Top Comments
  • 27 Hide
    Trull , February 19, 2013 12:19 PM
    Dat price... I don't know what they were thinking, tbh.

    AMD really has a chance now to come strong in 1 month. We'll see.
  • 26 Hide
    tlg , February 19, 2013 12:27 PM
    AMD already said in (a leaked?) teleconference that they will not respond to the TITAN with any card. It's not worth the small market at £1000...
  • 22 Hide
    jaquith , February 19, 2013 12:19 PM
    Hmm...$1K yeah there will be lines. I'm sure it's sweet.

    Better idea, lower all of the prices on the current GTX 600 series by 20%+ and I'd be a happy camper! ;) 

    Crysis 3 broke my SLI GTX 560's and I need new GPU's...
Other Comments
  • 22 Hide
    jaquith , February 19, 2013 12:19 PM
    Hmm...$1K yeah there will be lines. I'm sure it's sweet.

    Better idea, lower all of the prices on the current GTX 600 series by 20%+ and I'd be a happy camper! ;) 

    Crysis 3 broke my SLI GTX 560's and I need new GPU's...
  • 27 Hide
    Trull , February 19, 2013 12:19 PM
    Dat price... I don't know what they were thinking, tbh.

    AMD really has a chance now to come strong in 1 month. We'll see.
  • 3 Hide
    firefyte , February 19, 2013 12:20 PM
    Anyone else having problems with the 7th page?
  • 10 Hide
    tlg , February 19, 2013 12:23 PM
    The high price OBVIOUSLY is related to low yields, if they could get thousands of those on the market at once then they would price it near the gtx680. This is more like a "nVidia collector's edition" model. Also gives nVidia the chance to claim "fastest single gpu on the planet" for some time.
  • 26 Hide
    tlg , February 19, 2013 12:27 PM
    AMD already said in (a leaked?) teleconference that they will not respond to the TITAN with any card. It's not worth the small market at £1000...
  • -8 Hide
    wavebossa , February 19, 2013 12:36 PM
    wavebossa"Twelve 2 Gb packages on the front of the card and 12 on the back add up to 6 GB of GDDR5 memory. The .33 ns Samsung parts are rated for up to 6,000 Mb/s, and Nvidia operates them at 1,502 MHz. On a 384-bit aggregate bus, that’s 288.4 GB/s of bandwidth."12x2 + 12x2 = 6? ..."That card bears a 300 W TDP and consequently requires two eight-pin power leads."Shows a picture of a 6pin and an 8pin...I haven't even gotten past the first page but mistakes like this bug me


    Nevermind, the 2nd mistake wasn't a mistake. That was my own fail reading.
  • 21 Hide
    infernolink , February 19, 2013 12:46 PM
    Titan.. for those who want a Titan e-peen
  • 5 Hide
    ilysaml , February 19, 2013 12:47 PM
    Quote:
    The Titan isn’t worth $600 more than a Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition. Two of AMD’s cards are going to be faster and cost less.

    My understanding from this is that Titan is just 40-50% faster than HD 7970 GHz Ed that doesn't justify the Extra $1K.
  • 15 Hide
    battlecrymoderngearsolid , February 19, 2013 1:11 PM
    Can't it match GTX 670s in SLI? If yes, then I am sold on this card.

    What? Electricity is not cheap in the Philippines.
  • 14 Hide
    Fulgurant , February 19, 2013 1:20 PM
    Ninjawithagun$1000 per Titan card is a bit hard for most mid-range gamers and even high-end gamers to afford.


    Titan is a luxury product. It's not supposed to offer a competitive price/performance ratio, just as a Ferrari's price isn't based on its horsepower or fuel efficiency. Titan is a statement moreso than it is a bona-fide money maker for nVidia.

    The idea of status-symbol computer components strikes me as a little silly, of course, but I'm not in the target market. Neither are most gamers, whether high end or not.

    If you generally spend $1600 on the graphics' subsystem of your computer, then I'm not even sure you fit in the so-called high-end. Super-high-end, maybe. You are the 1%. :) 
  • 2 Hide
    azraa , February 19, 2013 1:22 PM
    Waaaay too much hype :/ 
    Its an engineering beauty, but what could make us wish it? Most gamers already have enough with 7970Ghz or 670s so... not a smart choice.
  • 19 Hide
    mindless728 , February 19, 2013 1:23 PM
    Quote:
    "Twelve 2 Gb packages on the front of the card and 12 on the back add up to 6 GB of GDDR5 memory. The .33 ns Samsung parts are rated for up to 6,000 Mb/s, and Nvidia operates them at 1,502 MHz. On a 384-bit aggregate bus, that’s 288.4 GB/s of bandwidth."

    12x2 + 12x2 = 6? ...


    the chips are Gb (Gigabit) not GB (Gigabyte) which is a difference of 8x

    so 12x2Gb+12x2Gb = 48 Gb = 6GB

    chips are commonly refereed to in capacity as the bit size not byte size
  • 13 Hide
    oxiide , February 19, 2013 1:23 PM
    wavebossa12x2 + 12x2 = 6?

    Assuming proper notation is being observed (often its not), "b" is a bit and "B" is a byte.

    6 Gigabytes = 48 Gigabits as 1 Byte = 8 bits.
  • 9 Hide
    renz496 , February 19, 2013 1:31 PM
    to me this thing is in the same league as Asus ARES II. both product are not something you discuss about price/performance.

    btw very interested how far this 'beast' will overclock
  • 8 Hide
    bl1nds1de13 , February 19, 2013 1:41 PM
    When compared to the GTX690 I would have to differ on saying that " there's no real reason not to favor it over Titan " ..... Any SLI or crossfire solution, including dual board cards like the 690, will have microstutters when compared to a single card setup. This has been thoroughly shown in several tests, and have seen it myself. A single card will never have scaling issues or microstutters.

    BL1NDS1DE13
  • 2 Hide
    Au_equus , February 19, 2013 1:45 PM
    Quote:
    Unfortunately, Nvidia says the 690’s magnesium alloy fan housing was too expensive...
    o.O and $1000 is cheap? The 690 sold for around the same price and nothing was said then. Can they come up with a better excuse? Idk, like aliens stole our magnesium... smh.
  • 11 Hide
    hero1 , February 19, 2013 1:48 PM
    Pass! I don't think it's worth forking out $2000 for 2 of these cards no matter how good or rare or awesome they are. $2000 gets you a nice i7 rig with 2x AMD Radeon 7970 GHz Ed./ GTX 680 SLI that are more than capable of handling anything you throw at them. Time to go ahead and place that order for GHz cards. Nice to see your face Titan but you ain't selling at the price we are looking for!
  • 2 Hide
    mayankleoboy1 , February 19, 2013 2:01 PM
    if i really want ultra performance, i would get 2xHD7970. Would get better gaming and compute performance.
  • 3 Hide
    aberkae , February 19, 2013 2:02 PM
    I cant wait for the review
Display more comments