All about Graphics Cards
 Latest Graphics Cards articles
All Graphics Cards articles

Newsletters


  • Ask your question about IT issues
  • Post

Partners

The Games selection

violent : More Mindless Violence Basic shooting game, but still so powerful! Use the mouse to take aim and shoot at the little beasties before they get to you. Use Space to reload....
action : Yoyo the Star Yoyo is a young girl who recently graduated and dreams to become a movie star (don't we all). You'll have to guide her on the path to stardom,...
Ads

Sponsored links

Graphics Settings For Each Of Our Tests

Previous Next
1:50 AM - 09/15/2008 by Tino Kreiss

Assassin’s Creed: All settings are set to maximum. Anti-aliasing and anisotropic filtering are applied via the .ini file. The game runs with DirectX 10. DirectX 9 cards switch it into DirectX 9 mode, which means that older cards may be quicker. The Radeon X800 with Shader Model 2.0 cannot start Assassin’s Creed on the test computer.

Assassins Creed graphics options

Assassin's Creed .ini file

Call of Duty 4: All settings are set to maximum. The switch for Dual Video Cards is activated on the SLI and CrossFire configurations.

Call of Duty 4 graphics options

Crysis: The tests were carried out at High and Very High quality. Anti-aliasing was activated in the game, and anisotropic filtering via the graphics driver. All DirectX 9 graphics chips are unable to switch into the Very High mode, which is only interesting with DirectX 10 anyway—there the water reflections and HDR rendering of the sun can really be seen.

Crysis graphics options

Crysis High Quality setting

Crysis Very High Quality setting

Difference between High and Very High graphics quality

Enemy Territory Quake Wars: The quality is set to High, lighting remains at normal, and shadows and soft particles are activated. The older AMD cards with DirectX 9 have no soft particles. This function is missing in the graphics menu, and its absence improves the frame rates. Why the function is missing is unclear, since the GeForce 6 can display them with OpenGL 1.5, wheres the X1000 series from AMD is specified at OpenGL Version 2.0.

Enemy Territory Quake Wars graphics option 1

Enemy Territory Quake Wars graphics option 2

Half Life 2: Episode 2: All settings are set to maximum; Reflect all, HDR rendering and Motion blur are activated.

Half Life 2 Episode 2 graphics options

Mass Effect: All settings are set to maximum. Anisotropic filtering is handled by the game, while anti-aliasing is activated via the graphics driver. We tested 4xAA and 8xAA—the older AMD cards do not offer 8xAA and it is only possible to get more than 6xAA using CrossFire. No custom filters are used for anti-aliasing, only default AA is evaluated.

To use anti-aliasing with the Radeon X1000, HD 2000 or HD 3000, MassEffect.exe was renamed to Bioshock.exe. The Nvidia GeForce 7 with the UT3 Engine does not support HDR rendering with simultaneous anti aliasing. The game runs with DirectX 10, while DirectX 9 cards switch it into DirectX 9 mode, which means that older cards may be quicker. The Radeon X800 with Shader Model 2.0 cannot start Mass Effect on the test system.

Mass Effect graphics options

Microsoft Flight X SP2: All settings are set to Ultra High. The frame limiter is always deactivated, and additional improvements to graphics and illumination are activated. Anti-aliasing and anisotropic filtering are selected via the graphics menu in the game. We had a little trouble with the X1000 series of AMD cards, but the graphics driver was able to force anti-aliasing. With the DirectX 9 cards, the DirectX 10 preview is not available, and as a result older cards have a greater speed advantage.

Microsoft Flight X SP2 graphics options 1

Microsoft Flight X SP2 graphics options 2

World in Conflict: All settings are set to Very High. The Very High setting was also used on 128 and 256 MB graphics cards even when the game recommends selecting a lower quality. Anti-aliasing and anisotropic filtering are set via the game, and since there is no 8xAF option, we used 4xAF. The game runs with DirectX 10; older DirectX-9 cards switch it into DirectX 9 mode, which means that older cards may be quicker.

World in Conflict graphics options 1

World in Conflict graphics options 2

3DMark06: The synthetic DirectX 9 benchmark runs at 1280x1024 pixels in default quality without filters. The CPU score with the Intel X38 chipset lies between 2521 and 2555. With the nforce 780i chipset, 3DMark06 achieved a CPU score of 2372 to 2427.

3DMark06 graphics options

Talkback
chise1 09/15/2008 8:17 AM
Hide
-1+

Thanks guys!

amdfangirl 09/15/2008 8:30 AM
Hide
-2+

Very good! Thanks guys!

If only you tested F@H PPD...

rocky1234 09/15/2008 8:58 AM
Hide
-11+

Not to nit pick but ummm where is the Radeon 4870x2 2GB card in those charts or did I miss it you know the one with 2GB memory umm 800x2 shaders GDDR5 memory 3.6Ghz rated at & 750 core x2 whatever.

c0d3r 09/15/2008 9:02 AM
Hide
-0+

So totally Awesome :D Gooood Job THG! What wud i do without u !

Mathos 09/15/2008 9:04 AM
Hide
-8+

Just curious. Why is it you're using catalyst 8.6 for the ATI cards which doesn't have proper support for the 4000 series cards, instead of 8.7 or 8.8? Yet for the Nvidia cards, you use the most up to date drivers.

cangelini 09/15/2008 9:22 AM
Hide
-1+

Rocky1234 :
Not to nit pick but ummm where is the Radeon 4870x2 2GB card in those charts or did I miss it you know the one with 2GB memory umm 800x2 shaders GDDR5 memory 3.6Ghz rated at & 750 core x2 whatever.



As mentioned in the charts introduction, these numbers take hours upon hours to compile, which means setting cut-offs for the product submissions and drivers. Unfortunately, the X2 didn't make it. However, there are results for a pair of 4870s in CrossFire, which is a roughly equivalent configuration. You'll also notice that there are no 4600-series Radeons. Again, same issue.

ossie 09/15/2008 9:37 AM
Hide
-4+

Why do I have the impression that at THG is a persistent confusion between power and energy?

JeanLuc 09/15/2008 10:45 AM
Hide
-0+

Great job, I'm always pointing people to the charts now they can compare the latest hardware.

The charts also show the difference between games they are coded well and ones that aren't. Compare Crysis (very high quality) and HL2 Ep2 at 1920 x 1200 4xAA 8xAF, on Crysis even the best hardware left begging for mercy at around 24fps, yet HL2 EP2 which looks just as good (graphically speaking) IMO will run at 30 FPS on a 8600 GTS (yes an 8600 GTS!) and X1800XL. A small portion of the difference can be put down to DX10 but not all of it.

Anonymous 09/15/2008 11:36 AM
Hide
-3+

Wonder why you insist on using catalyst 8.6 - a 3/4 months old driver, out *before* the whole HD4xx0 series and not really supporting it. And by the time the 48x0 cards were released you also had a better driver with actual support the the cards (and some 10% performance boost).

buzzlightbeer 09/15/2008 11:51 AM
Hide
-6+

OMFG they did it again, why oh why did they use 8.6 drivers didnt they learn from all the annoyed people from the last test

Anonymous 09/15/2008 12:22 PM
Show
randomizer 09/15/2008 12:55 PM
Hide
-2+

As a suggestion for permalinking chart comparisons, add an option for permalinking that doesn't contain HTML code. Some forums don't allow posting HTML. Also, using the URL in the browser address bar doesn't work because it contains square brackets, and I think the software tries to parse part of the URL as BBCode and this breaks the link. Otherwise it's just because it's non-standard in a URL. For example:

http://www.tomshardware.com/charts [...] .html?prod[2113]=on∏[2118]=on

The link breaks because of the []. It should point to http://www.tomshardware.com/charts [...] 2118%5D=on (permalink with HTML removed).

Pei-chen 09/15/2008 1:07 PM
Hide
-1+

I think for stability reason and to act as control, Tom's won't overclock the CPU but for a lot of these cards, 2.93GHz isn't enough. An e8600 would do a better job, let alone an overclocked 4.5GHz e8600.

jaydeejohn 09/15/2008 1:08 PM
Hide
--1+

Glad to see you mentioned the cpu restrictions. At 3Ghz, its simply not enough for todays cards, especially in CF/SLI. Great to see this, this is a long awaited achievement which only puts a + in the Toms site. Great going

jaydeejohn 09/15/2008 1:15 PM
Hide
--1+

jaydeejohn :
Glad to see you mentioned the cpu restrictions. At 3Ghz, its simply not enough for todays cards, especially in CF/SLI. Great to see this, this is a long awaited achievement which only puts a + in the Toms site. Great going


Some people are under the impression todays cpus are good enough at their stock speeds. We need more truth about this out there so people understand. I wish for newer updates with newer drivers as they come down the chute, especially when the cards are out and for sale. I hope it isnt too long before we see an update

randomizer 09/15/2008 1:34 PM
Hide
-7+

My E6600 @2.7GHz is sufficient I tell you!

swampthug 09/15/2008 1:57 PM
Hide
-0+

Okay, how does the single most powerful graphics card not make the 'cut-off'? If you've already spent 500 hours doing these benchmarks then what's the problem with spending a couple more? Man, that's annoying. How can you say the 4870 crossfire is similar enough to the 4870 x2 to justify not testing? The x2 has 2x the amount of GDDR5 memory. Stupid...

spaztic7 09/15/2008 1:57 PM
Hide
-4+

cangelini :




I disagree that 2 4870 = 1 4870x2. You do see a slight bump in performance with a 4870x2 over 2x4870. Then 4600 just came out, so you have an excuse for those, but not the 4870x2. Although I doubt my comments will be taken seriously and nothing will come of it, I am just amazed that THG refuses to use a 4870x2. It’s almost like you guys are biased against that card.

It just makes me mad... >:|

kitsilencer 09/15/2008 2:10 PM
Hide
-8+

Ah, the long looked-for update. A little late, but much welcomed all the same. Thanks.

Phantom93 09/15/2008 2:12 PM
Show

Comments are closed on this page.

Sponsored links