Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

Test System

Gigabit Ethernet: On-Board Chips Reviewed
By
Processor
Socket 478 Intel Pentium 4 Northwood, 3.2 GHz, 512 kB Cache, FSB800
Socket 604 Dual Intel Pentium 4 Xeon, 2.8 GHz, 512 kB Cache, FSB533
System Memory
DDR-SDRAM 2x 512 MB PC3700
OCZ Gold Edition Rev. 2 (2.5-3-3-7)
Network/Motherboard
3COM / Marvell 940 Asus P4C800, Rev. 1.03
Intel 875P chipset & ICH5-R
Broadcom BCM5705 Epox EP-4PCA3+, Rev. 1.0
Intel 875P chipset & ICH5-R
Intel 82547EI (CSA) DFI LanParty PRO875, Rev. A
Intel 875P chipset & ICH5-R
3COM 3C996B-T
Broadcom BCM5701
Asus PP-DLW, Rev. 1.03
Intel E7505 chipset
Realtek RTL8100S Gigabyte GA-8S655TX Ultra, Rev. 1.0
SiS655TX & SiS964
Other Hardware
Graphics card nVIDIA GeForce FX 5900, 128 MB
Controller Client systems: ICH5-R or SiS964 for RAID 0
Host system: Raidcore RC4000 für RAID 0
Hard drives (client systems) System drive: Western Digital WD800JB

Test drive: RAID-0 array consisting of
2x Hitachi Deskstar 7K250, HDS722580VLSA80, 80 GB,
7,200 rpm, 8 MB Cache

Hard drives (server system) System drive: Western Digital WD1000BB

Test drive: RAID-0 array consisting of
4x Western Digital WD360 Raptor, 36 GB,
10,000 rpm, 8 MB Cache

Software
Intel Chipset Intel Chipset Installation Utility 5.1.1.1002
Intel Application Accelerator RAID Edition Ver. 3.53
Network drivers 3COM / Marvel 940
Broadcom BCM5705 & BCM5701: Ver. 6.34.0.0
Intel Pro/1000 CT&MT (82547EI & 82541GI): Ver. 7.3.13.0
Realtek: Ver. 5.611.1231.2003
DirectX 9.0b
OS Windows XP Professional Build 2600 Service Pack 1

Tests: A Detailed Look

Synthetic Benchmarks
TCP Transfer performance NetIO Ver. 1.23 from Kai Uwe Rommel
TCP Transfer performance Netperf Ver. 2.1
TCP Transfer performance NetIQ Chariot 5.0
Application Benchmarks
Real Life Transfer Performance xxcopy 2.85.3 von Pixelab, Inc. idf2002_master.avi - 1.17 GB
Real Life Windows File Copy Performance Windows Explorer Drag&Drop Test idf2002_master.avi - 1.17 GB

During our benchmarks under real-life conditions, we copied the said file five times, doing so back to back. All tests were conducted five times in order to compensate for data dispersion while determining the mean.

To avoid a slowdown of the network adapter through an unnecessary bottleneck, we added a RAID 0 array (consisting of two current hard drives) to each system for this test. As a result, transfer rates von 110 MB/s were, therefore, no problem - that's more than most adapters manage as a net output.

There are 0 comments.
This thread is closed for comments