Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

Samsung ATIV Tab Review: A Tablet To Hold Your Breath For?

Samsung ATIV Tab Review: A Tablet To Hold Your Breath For?
By

Microsoft set the standard for Windows RT-based hardware, but is there still room for partners to sell compelling alternatives? We take our first Qualcomm-powered Windows RT tablet for a spin to determine if Samsung's ATIV Tab is worth waiting for.

Now that we're a few months into the life of Windows RT and Windows 8, we're noticing a number of trends that describe the way we use tablets based on the ARM and x86 architectures.

Despite the apparent freedom offered by Microsoft, Windows RT just isn't the productivity enabler we were hoping it'd be. It's nice to have Office, but there's just so much else missing. And once you hit that first must-have piece of software you can't use on an ARM-based device, the honeymoon is over and you're back to more typical tablet-oriented usage patterns.

On the other hand, although Intel's dual-core Atom Z2760 is definitely underpowered as a desktop workstation replacement, the compatibility story of x86 is a major boon (and that's before we launch into any discussion of performance or power consumption). Devices like Lenovo's upcoming Helix will help address any concerns about the Atom with an Ivy Bridge-based Core i7, a 1920x1080 display, and up to 10 hours of battery life.

The Tab You Can't Have, For Now

We're way ahead of ourselves, though. The Helix is a couple of months out still, and today we have another Windows RT-based device to look at: Samsung's ATIV Tab. This tablet is significant for a couple of reasons. First, it's the first in our lab with Qualcomm's APQ8060A SoC, a dual-core Krait-based design with Adreno 225 graphics. Also, you won't be able to buy it in the U.S. for the time being (we're only finding it for sale in the U.K. and Australia).

At CES this year, Samsung announced that it wouldn't be bringing the Tab to our shores just yet, citing lingering confusion about what Windows RT can and cannot do. The investment it would have required to educate customers and keep costs down weighed heavily on that decision.

Can we say we blame Samsung? Hardly. Just imagine answering this one all day long: "So wait, it's Windows, but I can't install Chrome on it? I'm limited to that weak list of apps in the Windows Store? I wish I knew that before I bought this thing!"

Right out of the gate, then, Samsung's ATIV Tab faces the same uphill battle as Microsoft's Surface, Dell's XPS 10, Lenovo's IdeaPad Yoga 11, and any other number of tablets with SoCs from Qualcomm and Nvidia. Even in the face of generally favorable battery life numbers, the ecosystem they lean on is more dysfunctional than the x86 space Intel and AMD compete in.

And so, armed with the understanding that the ATIV Tab's fate here is currently in limbo, we spent time before and after CES with it, eager to compare Qualcomm's Snapdragon S4 to Nvidia's Tegra 3 using some new power analysis, a handful of fresh benchmarks, and our own senses. Can the Tab overcome Windows RT's limitations to replace the iOS- and Android-based tablets in our lives?

Samsung's ATIV Tab

Fresh from Samsung's ATIV Smart PC 500T: An Atom-Based Windows 8 Tablet, the ATIV Tab feels very similar. In fact, we have the same feedback about the Tab's smooth plastic housing: we're not fans. The brushed aluminum look is aesthetically pleasing. But that glossy exterior feels slimy. It's bad enough that when you're handed a Tab that someone else was using, you want to wash your hands immediately after. The chassis also tends to "give" a bit when you press on it. We're glad to see Samsung design such an incredibly light tablet. In this case, as with the Smart PC 500T, build quality suffers, though.

Specifications
Length
Width
Depth
Screen Size
Resolution
Aspect Ratio
Weight
Apple iPad 3 (3G)
9.5"7.31".37"9.7"
2048x1536
4:3
1.46 lb.
Microsoft Surface
10.8"
6.8"
.37"
10.6"
1366x768
16:9
1.5 lb.
Microsoft Surface +
Type Cover
-
-
.50
-
-
-
1.51 lb.
Samsung ATIV Smart PC 500T
11.9"
7.2"
0.38"
11.6"1366x76816:91.65 lb.
Samsung ATIV Smart PC 500T +
Docking Station
-
-
.87
-
-
-
3.2 lb.
Samsung ATIV Tab
10.5"
6.6"
.35"
10.1"
1366x768
16:9
1.26 lb.


Of course, we probably shouldn't be surprised that the Tab looks a lot like the Smart PC 500T. Samsung is going for a sense of continuity through its various tablet designs, which helps explain the glossy finish and the little plastic port covers over its I/O connectors (another "feature" we didn't care for on the Smart PC).

We're at least happy to see such a diminutive tablet include micro-HDMI, USB 2.0, and microSD along its top edge. It'd just be nice if we didn't have to leave those little plastic pieces dangling off of the Tab when the ports and slots are in use.

The same 13-pin connector we found on the ATIV Smart PC 500T is also easily seen at the bottom of the Tab. Unfortunately, you can't just drop the Tab into the 500T's docking station because it's a lot smaller. The notches used to lock the dock into place don't line up. We have to assume that there's a separate docking station on the way, but Samsung hasn't announced it yet. For the time being, we're using the ATIV Tab as a pure tablet.

Inside The ATIV Tab

As mentioned, Samsung leans on Qualcomm's APQ8060A to power the Tab. Manufactured at 28 nm, the APQ8060A hosts a pair of Krait processor cores running at 1.5 GHz and the Adreno 225 graphics engine. The SoC lacks cellular capabilities, but it does feature an integrated dual-band 802.11a/b/g/n radio for Wi-Fi connectivity.  

ATIV Tab Specifications
SoC
Qualcomm APQ8060A, Dual-core Krait @ 1.5 GHz, Adreno 225 Graphics
Display
10.1" LCD, native 1366x768 resolution
Camera
Rear: 5 MP with LED Flash, Front: 1.9 MP
Battery
30.75 Wh
Networking
802.11a/b/g/n, 2.4 and 5 GHz bands; Bluetooth 4.0; Tap/Send File Sharing through NFC and BT/Wi-Fi
Memory
32 or 64 GB eMMC + 2 GB RAM; microSD Support up to 64 GB
Sensors
Accelerometer, Geomagnetic, Ambient Light, Gyroscope, and Grip Sensor
Physical Connectivity
USB 2.0, Micro-HDMI, MicroSD, 3.5 mm jack
Operating System
Windows RT with Office Home & Student 2013 RT Preview


Eager for more specific information about the battery that Samsung uses in the ATIV Tab, we took our sample apart and found the same 30.75 Wh power source used in the Smart PC 500T. That'll make our battery life testing a little more interesting, as we dig deep to figure out which SoC vendor offers the most efficient solution.

Display all 20 comments.
This thread is closed for comments
  • 0 Hide
    tanjo , January 21, 2013 4:01 AM
    Power consumption graphs says this tablet has Z2760.
  • 0 Hide
    kyuuketsuki , January 21, 2013 4:39 AM
    Quote:
    While we were at CES, however, we met up with Lazslo Kishonti, CEO of Kishonti Informatics and the developer of GLBenchmark. He pointed out that Atom-based tablets running Windows RT are more likely to deliver different levels of performance.

    Er, you mean Atom-based tablets running Windows 8? (Page 6, Paragraph 11)
    Quote:
    Power consumption graphs says this tablet has Z2760.Our setup is pretty basic: we set BrowsingBench to run in battery life mode, which prevents the browser from caching data. Instead of

    Where's the rest of this paragraph? (Page 6, Paragraph 13)
  • 2 Hide
    kyuuketsuki , January 21, 2013 4:43 AM
    Also, I'm not sure what's up with the Futuremark Peacekeeper and Rightware Browsermark results, but we know damn well the Krait S4 in this tab is a better performer in every way to the Tegra 3. Not sure why go with the S4 Play with the dual-core Krait and Adreno 225 instead of an S4 Pro with quad-core Krait and Adreno 320, though, especially in a tablet form-factor.
  • -4 Hide
    mayankleoboy1 , January 21, 2013 6:35 AM
    KyuuketsukiNot sure why go with the S4 Play with the dual-core Krait and Adreno 225 instead of an S4 Pro with quad-core Krait and Adreno 320, though, especially in a tablet form-factor.

    Because Win8 is already a battery hog compared to Android, and adding power hungry cores will make that worse.
    I dont see any issues with S4 pro and Android.
  • 0 Hide
    cangelini , January 21, 2013 9:39 AM
    KyuuketsukiEr, you mean Atom-based tablets running Windows 8? (Page 6, Paragraph 11)Where's the rest of this paragraph? (Page 6, Paragraph 13)

    Fixed!
  • -1 Hide
    dokterprio , January 21, 2013 11:01 AM
    Why there is difference in power usage between ativ tab and ativ smartpc 500t. I think they are the same, except the screen size.
  • 0 Hide
    adamovera , January 21, 2013 11:08 AM
    tanjoPower consumption graphs says this tablet has Z2760.

    Apologies, fixed now.
  • 1 Hide
    adamovera , January 21, 2013 11:13 AM
    dokterprioWhy there is difference in power usage between ativ tab and ativ smartpc 500t. I think they are the same, except the screen size.

    Sorry, we had the charts labelled the same. The ATIV Smart PC 500T has an Atom and runs Windows 8, while the ATIV Tab has an ARM-based chip from Qualcomm and runs Windows RT - they are actually very different devices.
  • 0 Hide
    ojas , January 21, 2013 11:24 AM
    BrowsingBench scores: are the ipads in correct order?
  • 1 Hide
    adamovera , January 21, 2013 11:45 AM
    ojasBrowsingBench scores: are the ipads in correct order?

    Seems to be, I haven't used this benchmark yet myself, and I'd have to check with the author to be sure, but I'd guess that these results are inversely reflecting the resolution of the different iPads.
  • 2 Hide
    Psycomo , January 21, 2013 12:02 PM
    "Can we say we blame Samsung? Hardly. Just imagine answering this one all day long: "So wait, it's Windows, but I can't install Chrome on it? I'm limited to that weak list of apps in the Windows Store? I wish I knew that before I bought this thing!""

    What a load of shite. If you can sell it abroad you can sell it in the US. If that is what they are thinking then they wouldnt be able to release it anywhere.
  • 0 Hide
    damianrobertjones , January 21, 2013 6:06 PM
    So... in 'reality' what resolution is the Rertina iPad running at when compared to screen space and productivity... yep, you can't compare them. Heck, a 1080p screen, for work, on a tablet blows the Retina away. Trouble is... you'll go blind so you might as well increase the DPI.
  • 0 Hide
    back_by_demand , January 21, 2013 9:58 PM
    PsycomoWhat a load of shite. If you can sell it abroad you can sell it in the US. If that is what they are thinking then they wouldnt be able to release it anywhere.

    I think they are passing judgement on typical Joe America here, not the fizzed up techy types (minority) but the dumbass hillbillies (vast majority) that have access to a local Best Buy but are as technically clued up as Amish folk.
  • 0 Hide
    ojas , January 22, 2013 11:24 AM
    adamoveraSeems to be, I haven't used this benchmark yet myself, and I'd have to check with the author to be sure, but I'd guess that these results are inversely reflecting the resolution of the different iPads.

    Ah, that way. But does that mean there was no standard resolution used for testing? But then i guess that wouldn't reflect the "out of the box" experience...
  • 0 Hide
    Anonymous , January 23, 2013 5:24 AM
    It's nice to have Office, but there's just so much else missing.


  • 0 Hide
    halcyon , January 24, 2013 1:32 PM
    Quote:
    Also, you won't be able to buy it in the U.S. for the time being (we're only finding it for sale in the U.K. and Australia).

    I stopped reading right there.
  • 0 Hide
    upgrade_1977 , January 24, 2013 3:19 PM
    No RT for me..
  • 0 Hide
    valuednotoutsourced , January 24, 2013 5:11 PM
    I don't know what Samsung model was reviewed, I was hoping they were reviewing the Samsung ATIV SmartPC model XE700T1C that is available in Canada. The specs for the Canadian model address most of the shortcomings revealed in the review.
    Samsung ATIV SmartPC model XE700T1C
    Chips - Intel® Core™ i5 Processor 3317U (1.70 GHz, 3 MB L3 Cache), Intel HM76, Intel® HD Graphics 4000, 4 GB DDR3 System Memory at 1600 MHz
    11.6" FHD LED Display (1920 x 1080), LCD-Touch Screen, S Pen (with Watcom 1024 Level Pressure Sensitivity Digitizer)
    Ports - Micro HDMI, Micro SD, USB3.0, Headphone out /Mic-in Combo, Dock Port, DC-in
    Bluetooth V4.0, Intel® Centrino® Advanced-N 6235, 2 x 2 802.11b/g/n (up to 300 Mbps), Widi Support
    - Multimedia - HD Audio, SoundAlive™, 1.6 W Stereo Speaker (0.8 W x 2), 2 MP + 5 MP Dual Cam
    - Physical Specification, 304.0 x 189.4 x 11.9 mm (11.97" x 7.46" x 0.47"), 0.88 kg (1.94 lbs)
    - Power - 40 Watt, 4 Cell (49Wh)

    Please review this model
  • 0 Hide
    mas , February 2, 2013 7:25 PM
    So is the goal to simply reproduce a laptop in the form factor of a tablet?
    In that case I already possess a full featured laptop that renders the tablet superfluous.

    On the other hand, if they incorporated full phone capabilities aka the Note2, (especially how about a phone function that includes ALL of the major phone & data carrier bands, making it a true international device?????????

    Also, include multiple user exchangeable micro SDHD (64-128GB) memory cards!

    And also implement a robust secure tightly integrated OS level RDP functionality that worked reliably everytime (esp if they could add the ability to securely remotely boot a computer),

    THEN I would have NO NEED for complete Windows functionality, nor would I risk the same degree of data exposure as carrying about a laptop!

    In other words, a truly converged device with both phone, user exchangeable memory, and remote secure policy driven robust reliable RDP would produce a compelling device offering me all the functionality I need.



  • 0 Hide
    halcyon , February 7, 2013 10:31 AM
    masSo is the goal to simply reproduce a laptop in the form factor of a tablet?

    For many, yes, as they've told themselves that that is more portable (I don't see it but to each their own).