Benchmark Results: Crysis
At 1920x1080, Crysis is showing us a very tight playing field here. The GeForce cards have a slight advantage in this title, though the factory overclocks don't seem to be doing that much. The average performance does seem to reflect a trend inline with the relative overclocks, though.
At the high 2560x1600 resolution, the playing field is even tighter. The Zotac AMP! edition card offers the best performance with a minimum frame rate that comes relatively close to 30 FPS.
55
Comments
Good to see sensible conclusions, bang for the buck.
Amazing how well the ATI cards are doing given their time on the market.
i am amazed by ati cards after one year on the market is still strong as hell. very good amd
I'm not liking the trend of these cards consuming more and more pci slots to be honest.
lol GTX 480 aginst the 5870
GTX 480 is looking very good and sexy
Did your lights flickered when you powered up that GTX480 ?
^^^^^
hahahahahhaah.
liked the flickered thing.
LOL
So, the conclusion is that the only good point about those factory overclocked cards are their coolers...
The graphs tell otherwise.
It's a shame the Big Green has paid off so many game developers that we'll never see a 'true' comparison between ATI & nVidia
In my previous card (HIS 4870 with a default zalman heatsink and an HIS fan) the fan failed, not so much a problem, I replaced with a better one, and that was better because while the heatsink is better (zalman one) the fan is crap (thin and very sensitive).
The HIS card in the article, the heatsink it is not superior to the references one, and if the fans are the same type than before, well...
I Like the gigabyte one, that heatpipes shines and offers superior cooling (ignore the inferior performance gain due to overclock).
The GTX 480 ... well, I don´t like physX.
Far Cry 2 is so Nvidia biased, why the hell do you use it to compare the cards? If that test disappeared the huge advantage in the conclusion graphic would get much smaller.
Why far cry 2 , crysis & dirt 2 chosen again & again knowing that nvidia performs better in these?? To show 480 much master than than 5870 ? Want an answer.
Did your lights flickered when you powered up that GTX480 ?
Did not notice, because they were busy with the benchmark...
... but their neighbor does...
At 100% fan speed, the card is noisier than a stock Radeon HD 5870. but it manages to keep the GPU cool, with temperatures under 70 degrees Fahrenheit at full load.
wow This fan must be blowing liquid-nitrogen!
Not as big of a gain with the factory oc'd 5870 cards over the 5870 reference design, certainly not enough to justify the additional cost, IMO.
No surprise that the 480 performs better than the 5870 overall, this is something that ATI stated would happen when they announced they would use dual gpu cards to compete with the high end nVidia single gpu cards.
Again with the Crysis and Far Cry benches...sheesh!
Just a heads up: on the second page, you mention that the fan keeps the card at under 70 degrees Fahrenheit on full load. I don't believe you!
these cards are both bad-ass. you cant expect a year old card to compete with that gtx 480. thumbs ups nvidia but watch out ati next gen is inbound
Next gen ATI isnt changing much, so i doubt performance will be massively increased. Maybe 15-30%, but nothing like the 4xxx series to the 5xxx series. However, their arch. change comes with 7xxx, and my money is, by the time Nvidia finishes the 4xx series, 6xxx will be out. By the time Nvidia releases 5xx (depending on if they go fast or go good), 7xxx will only be around the bend. 7xxx however is scheduled for around Q3-Q4 2011, so they have some time.