- video encoding benchmark
- intel xeon benchmark
- opteron 285
- xeon 5160 benchmark
- encoding benchmark
- amd opteron intel xeon benchmark
- amd opteron benchmark
- xeon 5080 benchmark
- xeon 5160 benchmarks
- intel xeon benchmarks
- opteron 285 review
- intel dual core xeon 5080
- sse core 2
- opteron 285 gaming
- opteron 285 motherboard
Partners
The Games selection
violent :
More Mindless Violence
Basic shooting game, but still so powerful! Use the mouse to take aim and shoot at the little beasties before they get to you. Use Space to reload....
|
action :
Yoyo the Star
Yoyo is a young girl who recently graduated and dreams to become a movie star (don't we all). You'll have to guide her on the path to stardom,...
|
Sponsored links
- Email |
- Print |
- Comment (1) |
- Share
Video


Video encoding is a computationally intensive task. From these results, we can see that the Opteron 285 is no match for the Xeon 5160, being outperformed by a margin of 20-30%. This significantly superior performance is due to the Single Cycle SSE unit in the Core 2 microarchitecture, which results in vastly superior media encoding. In these benchmarks the Opteron is even slightly slower than the Xeon 5080.
Audio


In our audio encoding benchmarks we can again see that the Xeon 5160 significantly outperforms the Opteron 285, by a margin of 30-35%; in this benchmark, however, the Opteron is able to attain better results than the Xeon 5080. As stated before, the Core 2's Single Cycle SSE unit is the reason for the Xeon 5160's superior performance.
- Intel FUD comes to tgdaily [CPU & Components]
- AMD Will regain Crown And Throne [CPU & Components]
- The Ultimate Hardware Guide [Last Update: 4-14-06] [CPU & Components]
- Conroe (intel) vs AMD SERIOUS ONLY [CPU & Components]
- Intel regains crown [CPU & Components]
Questions? Ask Tom's community!

where are the server benchmarks?