Intel Xeon and AMD Opteron Battle Head to Head
Table of contents
- 1. Xeon Woodcrest Vs. Opteron
- 2. Processors
- 3. Memory Interface
- 4. Systems
- 5. Test Setup
- 6. Benchmark Results
- 7. Applications
- 8. Synthetics
- 9. Power Consumption
- 10. Summary And Conclusion

Over the past few years Intel and AMD have been fiercely competing to outperform one another and gain market share by constantly introducing new "faster" processors. This competition has resulted in a fast and steady rate of innovation and has also kept prices down; no one manufacturer can monopolize the market.
Today we will be looking at processors from these two firms designed for the server market. Intel's server line processors go by the name of: Xeon, while AMD has named theirs Opteron. AMD's Opterons have enjoyed a lead in performance in the server market for the past few years due to their superior architecture resulting in better performance and lower power consumption (higher performance per watt). Learning from its mistakes and realizing that the current design could not compete with the mighty Opteron, Intel has introduced a completely new Xeon processor, based on its Core 2 microarchitecture.

Latest CPU News
Latest CPU reviews
- 05/22 – Core i5-3570K, -3550, -3550S, And -3570T: Ivy Bridge Efficiency
- 05/18 – Best Gaming CPUs For The Money: May 2012
- 05/15 – AMD A10-4600M Review: Mobile Trinity Gets Tested
- 05/14 – Core i7-3720QM: Ivy Bridge Makes Its Mark On Mobility
- 04/23 – Intel Core i7-3770K Review: A Small Step Up For Ivy Bridge
where are the server benchmarks?