
The Radeon 9600 PRO has a hard time in this test and clearly gets bested by the FX 5600 Ultra, and even by the Ti 4200.
3D Mark 2001: Fillrate Single Texturing

The results are slightly confusing. By rights, the Radeon 9500 PRO should score much higher. Maybe this eight-pipe card is suffering from insufficient memory bandwidth here, with the result that the pipes aren't filled with data quickly enough. FX 5600 Ultra and Radeon 9600 PRO are practically tied.
3D Mark 2001: Fillrate Multi Texturing

The scores of the 9600 PRO took us by surprise here - it seems that the higher core clock speed is partly able to make up for the lack of pixel pipelines. The FX 5600 Ultra doesn't fare as well in this test.
Previous
Next
Summary
- Introduction
- Radeon 9600 PRO, Alias RV350
- The Radeon 9600 PRO In Summary
- Radeon 9600 PRO Card Versions
- A Matter Of IQ
- A Matter Of IQ, Continued
- Test Setup
- Benchmarks
- Unreal Tournament 2003: 2x FSAA
- Unreal Tournament 2003: 4x FSAA
- Unreal Tournament 2003: 8x Anisotropic
- Unreal Tournament 2003: 4xFSAA + 8x Anisotropic
- Serious Sam - Second Encounter: Standard Test
- Serious Sam - Second Encounter: Min FPS
- Serious Sam - Second Encounter: 2x FSAA
- Serious Sam - Second Encounter: 4x FSAA
- Serious Sam - Second Encounter: 8x Anisotropic
- Serious Sam - Second Encounter: 4xFSAA + 8x Anisotropic
- Splinter Cell: Standard Test
- Splinter Cell: Min FPS
- Aquanox 2: Standard Test
- Codecreatures: Standard Test
- Codecreatures: Avg # Of Polys
- 3D Mark 2001: Standard 1024x768
- 3D Mark 2001: Game 4 Nature
- 3D Mark 2001: High Polygon Count
- 3D Mark 2003: Standard 1024x768
- 3D Mark 2003: Vertex Shader Speed
- Conclusion
Ask a Category Expert
Create a new thread in the Reviews comments forum about this subject
There are 0 comments.
This thread is closed for comments