Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

Benchmark Results: Productivity

Intel Core i7-3770K Review: A Small Step Up For Ivy Bridge
By

The ongoing pattern seems consistent enough that I could probably get away without any analysis here at all. In a threaded title like FineReader, the six-core Sandy Bridge-E chips walk away with an advantage.

Behind them, quad-core Ivy and Sandy Bridge-based chips running at the same clock rate (Core i7-3770K and -2700K, more specifically) land a few seconds apart, but always with Ivy Bridge in the lead. 

Meanwhile, AMD’s Phenom II and FX flagships seem content to do battle with Core i5-2550K. Though, in this case, the FX springs up into the lead ahead of Intel’s mainstream processor.

I typically don’t use Fritz in my processor launch stories, but I’ve received enough requests to reincorporate it that I’m including results in today’s piece.

Sandy Bridge-E clearly rules, while the IPC optimizations inherent to Ivy Bridge give it the slightest edge over Sandy Bridge at a given clock rate.

Aggressive threading allows FX-8150 to outpace Phenom II X6, as both AMD chips outrun Intel’s Core i5-2550K.

A demanding Google Chrome compile workload takes more than 30 minutes on three of today’s contenders. The two six-core Sandy Bridge-E-based parts get the job done in well under 20 minutes.

Core i7-3770K and -2770K fall somewhere in between, separated by just 22 seconds.

Our PDF document creation is decidedly single-threaded. Naturally, then, Intel’s Ivy and Sandy Bridge architectures do particularly well, while the lower IPC of AMD’s designs cannot be overcome by clock rate.

The slight improvements in Ivy Bridge are enough to give Core i7-3770K a first-place finish. Intel’s two Sandy Bridge implementations follow closely behind.

Ask a Category Expert

Create a new thread in the Reviews comments forum about this subject

Example: Notebook, Android, SSD hard drive

Display all 217 comments.
This thread is closed for comments
Top Comments
  • 32 Hide
    verbalizer , April 23, 2012 4:37 PM
    OK after reading most of the review and definitely studying the charts;
    I have a few things on my mind.

    1.) AMD - C'mon and get it together, you need to do better...
    2.) imagine if Intel made an i7-2660K or something like the i5-2550K they have now.
    3.) SB-E is not for gaming (too highly priced...) compared to i7 or i5 Sandy Bridge
    4.) Ivy Bridge runs hot.......
    5.) IB average 3.7% faster than i7 SB and only 16% over i5 SB = not worth it
    6.) AMD - C'mon and get it together, you need to do better...

    (moderator edit..)
  • 30 Hide
    Maziar , April 23, 2012 4:08 PM
    Great review as always Chris! looks like I'm staying with my 2500k for a while!
  • 23 Hide
    sublime2k , April 23, 2012 4:47 PM
    Now I'm happy for buying 2500K instead of waiting for IB. :) 
Other Comments
  • 18 Hide
    tecmo34 , April 23, 2012 4:07 PM
    Nice Review Chris...

    Looking forward to the further information coming out this week on Ivy Bridge, as I was initially planning on buying Ivy Bridge, but now I might turn to Sandy Bridge-E
  • 30 Hide
    Maziar , April 23, 2012 4:08 PM
    Great review as always Chris! looks like I'm staying with my 2500k for a while!
  • 7 Hide
    jaquith , April 23, 2012 4:11 PM
    Great and long waited review - Thanks Chris!

    Temps as expected are high on the IB, but better than early ES which is very good.

    Those with their SB or SB-E (K/X) should be feeling good about now ;) 
  • 5 Hide
    xtremexx , April 23, 2012 4:11 PM
    saw this just pop up on google, posted 1 min ago, anyway im probably going to update i have a core i3 2100 so this is pretty good.
  • 7 Hide
    ojas , April 23, 2012 4:15 PM
    it's heeearrree!!!!! lol i though intel wan't launching it, been scouring the web for an hour for some mention.

    Now, time to read the review. :D 
  • -3 Hide
    zanny , April 23, 2012 4:18 PM
    It gets higher temps at lower frequencies? What the hell did Intel break?

    I really wish they would introduce a gaming platform between their stupidly overpriced x79esque server platform and the integrated graphics chips they are pushing mainstream. 50% more transistors should be 30% or so more performance or a much smaller chip, but gamers get nothing out of Ivy Bridge.
  • 5 Hide
    JAYDEEJOHN , April 23, 2012 4:23 PM
    It makes sense Intel is making this its quickest ramp ever, as they see ARM on the horizon in today's changing market.
    They're using their process to get to places they'll need to get to in the future
  • 32 Hide
    verbalizer , April 23, 2012 4:37 PM
    OK after reading most of the review and definitely studying the charts;
    I have a few things on my mind.

    1.) AMD - C'mon and get it together, you need to do better...
    2.) imagine if Intel made an i7-2660K or something like the i5-2550K they have now.
    3.) SB-E is not for gaming (too highly priced...) compared to i7 or i5 Sandy Bridge
    4.) Ivy Bridge runs hot.......
    5.) IB average 3.7% faster than i7 SB and only 16% over i5 SB = not worth it
    6.) AMD - C'mon and get it together, you need to do better...

    (moderator edit..)
  • 5 Hide
    Pezcore27 , April 23, 2012 4:45 PM
    Good review.

    To me it shows 2 main things. 1) that Ivy didn't improve on Sandy Bridge as much as Intel was hoping it would, and 2) just how far behind AMD actually is...
  • 1 Hide
    pacioli , April 23, 2012 4:45 PM
    I don't know what to say... I'm not feeling jittery about upgrading and blowing $ on a new system... That is good I guess.
    I would have liked to see a bigger jump in performance. I'm still very satisfied with the i5 2500K system I built last year... This may actually be bad for Intel as they simply didn't innovate as much as I thought they would...
  • 23 Hide
    sublime2k , April 23, 2012 4:47 PM
    Now I'm happy for buying 2500K instead of waiting for IB. :) 
  • 4 Hide
    MKBL , April 23, 2012 4:55 PM
    It has been rumored that Ivy Bridge will be more expensive than comparable Sandy Bridge because of limited launch supply for a while. Is that right that Intel really will set Ivy's price low?
  • -1 Hide
    duckwithnukes , April 23, 2012 4:58 PM
    I was more interested in the peak power consumption difference between Sandy Bridge and Ivy Bridge while running the processors at full load. That's where the real savings in power will be attained.

    It's clear that while idling, there won't be much of a difference.

    Too bad Tomshardware dropped the ball on that one.
  • -7 Hide
    larkspur , April 23, 2012 5:01 PM
    Here is a more in-depth look at overclocking Ivy: http://www.anandtech.com/show/5763/undervolting-and-overclocking-on-ivy-bridge.
  • -6 Hide
    Pezcore27 , April 23, 2012 5:01 PM
    Quote:
    It has been rumored that Ivy Bridge will be more expensive than comparable Sandy Bridge because of limited launch supply for a while. Is that right that Intel really will set Ivy's price low?

    Ivy bridge's prices are expected to be lower than the current SB prices, yes.

    They have an expected pricing guide in the anandtech review.

    http://www.anandtech.com/show/5771/the-intel-ivy-bridge-core-i7-3770k-review/2
  • 0 Hide
    larkspur , April 23, 2012 5:05 PM
    Sry bad link, let's try again: http://www.anandtech.com/show/5763/undervolting-and-overclocking-on-ivy-bridge
  • 0 Hide
    halcyon , April 23, 2012 5:07 PM
    sublime2kNow I'm happy for buying 2500K instead of waiting for IB.

    I went with the 2500K too...but I kinda wish I'd gone with a 2700K...even if it is just for gaming. IB is beyond what I need right now...this month at least.
  • 6 Hide
    gti88 , April 23, 2012 5:10 PM
    I think, I'll upgrade my 775 to Sandy Bridge.
    I was waiting reviews just to be sure.
  • 3 Hide
    hellfire24 , April 23, 2012 5:15 PM
    it's not an 'upgrade',it's just an 'update'.
    don't regret yourself if you have a SB cpu!
Display more comments